The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy for studies in journal or conference abstracts (STARD for Abstracts) was developed for guiding the reporting of abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies, which was published in BMJ in August 2017. The study mainly introduced and interpreted the items of STARD for Abstracts, in order to help domestic researchers to perform and report the abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies by STARD for Abstracts.
Citation:
TIAN Jinhui, ZHAO Ye, MA Wenjuan, DU Liang. Interpretation of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) for Abstracts. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(9): 1096-1099. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201709001
Copy
Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved
1. |
田金徽, 陈杰峰, 主编. 诊断试验系统评价/Meta 分析指导手册. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015: 1-35.
|
2. |
Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Gatsonis CA, et al. STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts. BMJ, 2017, 358: j3751.
|
3. |
严卫丽. 第五讲: 如何报告临床诊断准确性研究—国际报告规范 STARD 解读. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(5): 386-389.
|
4. |
Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med, 2010, 7(2): e1000217.
|
- 1. 田金徽, 陈杰峰, 主编. 诊断试验系统评价/Meta 分析指导手册. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015: 1-35.
- 2. Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Gatsonis CA, et al. STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts. BMJ, 2017, 358: j3751.
- 3. 严卫丽. 第五讲: 如何报告临床诊断准确性研究—国际报告规范 STARD 解读. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(5): 386-389.
- 4. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med, 2010, 7(2): e1000217.