TIAN Jinhui 1,2 , ZHAO Ye 1,2 , MA Wenjuan 1,2 , DU Liang 3,4
  • 1. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, P.R.China;
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Clinical Translational Research and Evidence-based Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, P.R.China;
  • 3. West China Medical Publishers, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
  • 4. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
DU Liang, Email: duliang0606@vip.sina.com
Diagnostic accuracy study; Abstracts; Reporting guideline; Interpretation
10.7507/1672-2531.201709001
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy for studies in journal or conference abstracts (STARD for Abstracts) was developed for guiding the reporting of abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies, which was published in BMJ in August 2017. The study mainly introduced and interpreted the items of STARD for Abstracts, in order to help domestic researchers to perform and report the abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies by STARD for Abstracts.

Citation： TIAN Jinhui, ZHAO Ye, MA Wenjuan, DU Liang. Interpretation of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) for Abstracts. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(9): 1096-1099. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201709001 Copy

  • Previous Article

    The effect of full-time teaching position in clinician education

  • Next Article

    Analysis model of complications for hypertensive patients