Interpretation of reporting guidance for research involvement of patients and the public (GRIPP 2)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WU Peixia ^1,2,4 ,  HU Yan ^1,3,4

1. Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, P.R.China;
2. The Fudan Evidence-Based Nursing Center, Affiliate Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
3. School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
4. Evidence-based Medicine Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

HU Yan, Email: huyan@fudan.edu.cn

Keywords：

Patients and public involvement; Guidance for reporting; Interpretation

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201709138

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

To standardize and improve the quality of reporting of patient and public involvement in health and social care research, BMJ recently published the 2^nd edition of Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP 2). This paper introduces the background and process of GRIPP 2 development, and explains the core content of GRIPP 2. It is expected that GRIPP 2 will provide reference for domestic researchers carrying out patients and public involvement (PPI) research and writing PPI research report.

Citation： WU Peixia, HU Yan. Interpretation of reporting guidance for research involvement of patients and the public (GRIPP 2). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(1): 96-100. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201709138 Copy

1.	Department of health. The royal liver pool children’s inquiry: summary and recommendations. London: The Stationery Office, 2001. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/250914/0012_i.pdf.
2.	Teasdale GM. Learning from Bristol: report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Br J Neurosurg, 2002, 16(3): 211-216.
3.	Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, et al. Research with patient and public involvement: a realist evaluation-the RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library, 2015.
4.	Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, et al. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care, 2012, 24(1): 28-38.
5.	Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP 2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ, 2017, 358: j3453.
6.	Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2011, 27(4): 391-399.
7.	Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient, 2014, 7(4): 387-395.
8.	胡昭阳. 众包科学: 网络传播语境下的公众参与创新. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.

1. Department of health. The royal liver pool children’s inquiry: summary and recommendations. London: The Stationery Office, 2001. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment_data/file/250914/0012_i.pdf.
2. Teasdale GM. Learning from Bristol: report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Br J Neurosurg, 2002, 16(3): 211-216.
3. Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, et al. Research with patient and public involvement: a realist evaluation-the RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library, 2015.
4. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, et al. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care, 2012, 24(1): 28-38.
5. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP 2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ, 2017, 358: j3453.
6. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2011, 27(4): 391-399.
7. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient, 2014, 7(4): 387-395.
8. 胡昭阳. 众包科学: 网络传播语境下的公众参与创新. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.

Previous Article
Reporting intervention detail, improving usability of systematic reviews

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Interpretation of reporting guidance for research involvement of patients and the public (GRIPP 2)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Format

Content