• School of International Pharmaceutical Business of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210000, P.R.China;
MA Aixia, Email: ma86128@sina.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objectives To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dezocine combine with sufentanil (DS) versus sufentanil (S) for postoperative analgesia.Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Wiley Online Library and ScienceDirect databases were searched online to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DS versus S for postoperative analgesia from January 2011 to July 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata13.0 software.Results A total of 39 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: DS group had higher scores on VAS at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h points than S group at the dezocine level of 0.2 mg/kg. At the dezocine level of 0.3 mg/kg, there were no significant differences in scores on VAS at 2 h and 4 h. However, DS group had higher scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h points. At the dezocine level of 10 mg/kg, there were no significant differences in scores on VAS at each time point in both groups. DS group was superior to S group in " excellent rate” and " good rate” of the analgesic satisfaction of patients. For safety, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting of DS group was lower than S group.Conclusions The current evidence shows that dezocine combine with sufentanil have more effects of postoperative analgesia than sufentanil alone, and its incidence of adverse reactions is lower. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.

Citation: FU Luyang, LI Hongchao, CHEN Pingyu, ZHANG Jiyuan, XIONG Xiaomo, MA Aixia. Efficacy and safety of the combination of dezocine and sufentanil versus sufentanil for postoperative analgesia: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(4): 448-456. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201801121 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of palifermin on oral mucositis and aGVHD for hematological malignancy patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Efficacy and safety of Shenlingbaizhusan as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis