The development of evidence-based medicine covering view of scientism and humanism: indicating the future prospect of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

ZHAO Chen ^1,2 ^# , TIAN Guihua ^3,4 ^# , WANG Yanping ⁵ , LI Youping ⁴ , BIAN Zhaoxiang ¹ ,  SHANG Hongcai ³ ,  WANG Yongyan ^3,5

1. School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, P.R.China;
2. Institute for Research and Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Shenzhen, 518057, P.R.China;
3. Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, P.R.China;
4. Chinese Centre of Evidence-based Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
5. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

SHANG Hongcai, Email: shanghongcai@foxmail.com; WANG Yongyan, Email: wangyongyan1938@163.com

Keywords：

Evidence-based medicine; View of scientism; View of humanism; Narrative medicine; Evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201810038

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Scientism and humanism are two main views on the development of medicine, which run through both theory and practice. Under the guidance of the modern medical concept of " bio-psycho-social”, the views of scientism and humanism on medicine have reached an unprecedented level of development and integration, which jointly determine the connotations and demands of current medicine. As one of the current mainstream medical models, evidence-based medicine (EBM) has played an important role in the management of current medical theories and practices. Meanwhile, EBM has also encompassed views of scientism and humanism in its own development and has successfully shaped the knowledge and methodological system. EBM will continue to gain insight into the characteristics of views of scientism and humanism in the future of medicine to improve itself and should pay more attention to the development of humanism view. As an important branch discipline of EBM, evidence-based Chinese medicine may become a model of the perfect combination of scientism view and humanism view.

Citation： ZHAO Chen, TIAN Guihua, WANG Yanping, LI Youping, BIAN Zhaoxiang, SHANG Hongcai, WANG Yongyan. The development of evidence-based medicine covering view of scientism and humanism: indicating the future prospect of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(2): 232-237. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201810038 Copy

1.	李忠民, 孙振球. 循证医学中的科学人文精神. 中国循证医学杂志, 2005, 5(10): 804-806.
2.	邱晓晓, 戴雍月, 李银苹, 等. 将循证医学和人文理念引入医学 PBL 教学的必要性分析与探索. 教育教学论坛, 2016, (32): 178-179.
3.	段碧芳, 刘建平. 中医人文特征与循证医学评价方法. 中医杂志, 2007, 48(2): 314-316.
4.	白融, 白虹. 中世纪医学教育与经院哲学-兼论医学生人文精神培育的内涵. 医学与哲学, 2014, (3): 77-80.
5.	郭建. 现代医学技术的异化及其哲学反思. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2017.
6.	World health organization. Frequently asked questions, 2018. Available at: http://www.who.int/suggestions/faq/en/.
7.	杜亮, 李幼平. Archie Cochrane-Cochrane 系统评价的倡导者. 中国循证医学杂志, 2005, 5(2): 174-176.
8.	Cochrane AL, Holland WW. Validation of screening procedures. Br Med Bull, 1971, 27(1): 3.
9.	Cochrane AL, Leger ASS, Moore F. Health service’input’and mortality’output’in developed countries. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1978, 32(3): 200-205.
10.	Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 1992, 268(17): 2420-2425.
11.	Guyatt GH, Rennie D. Users’Guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press. 2002: 12-13.
12.	Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. How to practice and teach EBM. 2^nd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
13.	Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med, 2010, 152(11): 726-732.
14.	Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. 系统评价和 Meta 分析优先报告的条目: PRISMA 声明. 中西医结合学报, 2009, 18(3): e123.
15.	Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7634): 35-35.
16.	Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12.
17.	Shea B, Grimshaw M, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7(1): 1-7.
18.	Wells GA, Shea B, O’connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
19.	柴丽菊, 高淑贤, 许永顺, 等. 循证护理中人文关怀在心血管介入诊疗中的影响分析. 山西医药杂志, 2017, 46(18): 2253-2255.
20.	Cheng CW, Wu TX, Shang HC, et al. CONSORT extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas 2017: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 167(2): 112-121.
21.	Pandis N, Fleming PS, Hopewell S, et al. The CONSORT statement: application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(6): 663-679.
22.	Montgomery P, Grant S, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 407.
23.	杨文登. 循证医学的哲学反思及其对人文社会科学实践的启示. 循证医学, 2010, 10(1): 49-53.
24.	Charon R. Narrative medicine: form, function, and ethics. Ann Intern Med, 2001, 134(1): 83-87.
25.	张晓雨, 陈诗琪, 李承羽, 等. 循证中医药学理论研究与应用实践. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(1): 86-91.

1. 李忠民, 孙振球. 循证医学中的科学人文精神. 中国循证医学杂志, 2005, 5(10): 804-806.
2. 邱晓晓, 戴雍月, 李银苹, 等. 将循证医学和人文理念引入医学 PBL 教学的必要性分析与探索. 教育教学论坛, 2016, (32): 178-179.
3. 段碧芳, 刘建平. 中医人文特征与循证医学评价方法. 中医杂志, 2007, 48(2): 314-316.
4. 白融, 白虹. 中世纪医学教育与经院哲学-兼论医学生人文精神培育的内涵. 医学与哲学, 2014, (3): 77-80.
5. 郭建. 现代医学技术的异化及其哲学反思. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2017.
6. World health organization. Frequently asked questions, 2018. Available at: http://www.who.int/suggestions/faq/en/.
7. 杜亮, 李幼平. Archie Cochrane-Cochrane 系统评价的倡导者. 中国循证医学杂志, 2005, 5(2): 174-176.
8. Cochrane AL, Holland WW. Validation of screening procedures. Br Med Bull, 1971, 27(1): 3.
9. Cochrane AL, Leger ASS, Moore F. Health service’input’and mortality’output’in developed countries. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1978, 32(3): 200-205.
10. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 1992, 268(17): 2420-2425.
11. Guyatt GH, Rennie D. Users’Guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press. 2002: 12-13.
12. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. How to practice and teach EBM. 2^nd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
13. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med, 2010, 152(11): 726-732.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. 系统评价和 Meta 分析优先报告的条目: PRISMA 声明. 中西医结合学报, 2009, 18(3): e123.
15. Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7634): 35-35.
16. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12.
17. Shea B, Grimshaw M, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7(1): 1-7.
18. Wells GA, Shea B, O’connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
19. 柴丽菊, 高淑贤, 许永顺, 等. 循证护理中人文关怀在心血管介入诊疗中的影响分析. 山西医药杂志, 2017, 46(18): 2253-2255.
20. Cheng CW, Wu TX, Shang HC, et al. CONSORT extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas 2017: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 167(2): 112-121.
21. Pandis N, Fleming PS, Hopewell S, et al. The CONSORT statement: application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(6): 663-679.
22. Montgomery P, Grant S, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 407.
23. 杨文登. 循证医学的哲学反思及其对人文社会科学实践的启示. 循证医学, 2010, 10(1): 49-53.
24. Charon R. Narrative medicine: form, function, and ethics. Ann Intern Med, 2001, 134(1): 83-87.
25. 张晓雨, 陈诗琪, 李承羽, 等. 循证中医药学理论研究与应用实践. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(1): 86-91.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

The development of evidence-based medicine covering view of scientism and humanism: indicating the future prospect of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content