The systematic review/meta-analysis database of traditional Chinese medicine (SMD-TCM) was focused on incubation and application of the secondary research achievement. At present, the establishment of front and back websites, evidence input and evaluation have been completed. In the near future, the automation of overview and the visual presentation of evidence information will be realized, which provides the technical support for integration, analysis and application of evidence in the secondary research of TCM. This paper introduces the construction of SMD-TCM database which includes: requirements of construction, design principles, working process, evidence processing, ensuring quality of data input, data analysis and application, etc.
Citation：
JI Zhaochen, YANG Fengwen, HU Haiyin, LI Nan, WANG Keyi, ZHANG Mingyan, WANG Hucheng, ZHANG Lishuang, ZHAO Hongjie, PANG Wentai, ZHANG Junhua. Construction of the systematic review/meta-analysis database of traditional Chinese medicine. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2020, 20(1): 98-101. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201909017
Copy
| 1. |
张伯礼, 张俊华. 中医药现代化研究 20 年回顾与展望. 中国中药杂志, 2015, 40(17): 3331-3334.
|
| 2. |
张俊华, 孙鑫. 循证中医药学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2018: 4.
|
| 3. |
中华人民共和国中医药法. Available at: http://fjs.satcm.gov.cn/zhengcewenjian/2018-03-24/2249.html.
|
| 4. |
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7: 10.
|
| 5. |
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Chin Integ Med, 2009, 18(3): e123.
|
| 6. |
WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO, 2016. Avaliable at: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/XVIII..
|
- 1. 张伯礼, 张俊华. 中医药现代化研究 20 年回顾与展望. 中国中药杂志, 2015, 40(17): 3331-3334.
- 2. 张俊华, 孙鑫. 循证中医药学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2018: 4.
- 3. 中华人民共和国中医药法. Available at: http://fjs.satcm.gov.cn/zhengcewenjian/2018-03-24/2249.html.
- 4. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7: 10.
- 5. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Chin Integ Med, 2009, 18(3): e123.
- 6. WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO, 2016. Avaliable at: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/XVIII..
