Interpretation of consolidate framework for implementation research (CFIR)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

ZHANG Qiuwen ^1,2 ,  PANG Dong ^1,2 , HU Jiale ³ , WANG Zhiwen ^1,2 , JIN Sanli ^1,2 , YANG Wantong ^1,2

1. School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R.China;
2. Peking University Health Science Center for Evidence-based Nursing, Beijing 100191, P.R.China;
3. Department of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia 23298, USA;

Corresponding author：

PANG Dong, Email: pangdong@bjmu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Implementation science; Implementation study; Evidence-based practice; Theoretical framework; Interpretation

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202008076

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) extracted, analyzed and integrated many published theories, frameworks and models of implementation research, and provided a comprehensive and practical theoretical framework for researchers to explore the influencing factors in the implementation of evidence. This paper introduces the origin, core content and application examples of CFIR in evidence-based nursing practice, in order to provide reference for researchers to use CFIR to carry out implementation research.

Citation： ZHANG Qiuwen, PANG Dong, HU Jiale, WANG Zhiwen, JIN Sanli, YANG Wantong. Interpretation of consolidate framework for implementation research (CFIR). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(3): 355-360. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202008076 Copy

1.	Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci, 2006, 1(1): 1.
2.	Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, et al. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ, 2013, 347: f6753.
3.	Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci, 2015, 10(1): 53.
4.	Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 124.
5.	Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med, 2006, 21(Suppl 2): S1-S8.
6.	Ridde V, Pérez D, Robert E. Using implementation science theories and frameworks in global health. BMJ Glob Health, 2020, 5(4): e002269.
7.	Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009, 4(15): 50.
8.	Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Kitson A, et al. Getting evidence into practice: ingredients for change. Nurs Stand, 2002, 16(37): 38-43.
9.	Graham ID, Logan J. Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. Can J Nurs Res, 2004, 36(2): 89-103.
10.	Stetler CB. Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nurs Outlook, 2001, 49(6): 272-279.
11.	Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Welcome to the CFIR technical assistance website. Available at: http://www.cfirguide.org/.
12.	Vandevanter N, Vu M, Nguyen A, et al. A qualitative assessment of factors influencing implementation and sustainability of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in Vietnam health centers. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 73.
13.	Vandevanter N, Kumar P, Nguyen N, et al. Application of the consolidated framework for implementation research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 27.
14.	Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci, 2013, 8(1): 51.
15.	Vidgen HA, Love PV, Wutzke SE, et al. A description of health care system factors in the implementation of universal weight management services for children with overweight or obesity: case studies from Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1): 109.
16.	Garbutt JM, Dodd S, Walling E, et al. Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Bmc Family Practice, 2018, 19(1): 53.
17.	Soi C, Gimbel S, Chilundo B, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine delivery in Mozambique: identification of implementation performance drivers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1): 151.
18.	Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, et al. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci, 2016, 6(11): 72.
19.	Means AR, Kemp CG, Gwayi-Chore MC, et al. Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 17.
20.	Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, et al. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci, 2019, 14(1): 42.
21.	Hu J, Ruan H, Li Q, et al. Barriers and facilitators to effective procedural pain treatments for pediatric patients in the chinese context: a qualitative descriptive study. J Pediatr Nurs, 2020, 54: 78-85.

1. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci, 2006, 1(1): 1.
2. Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, et al. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ, 2013, 347: f6753.
3. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci, 2015, 10(1): 53.
4. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 124.
5. Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, et al. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med, 2006, 21(Suppl 2): S1-S8.
6. Ridde V, Pérez D, Robert E. Using implementation science theories and frameworks in global health. BMJ Glob Health, 2020, 5(4): e002269.
7. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009, 4(15): 50.
8. Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Kitson A, et al. Getting evidence into practice: ingredients for change. Nurs Stand, 2002, 16(37): 38-43.
9. Graham ID, Logan J. Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. Can J Nurs Res, 2004, 36(2): 89-103.
10. Stetler CB. Updating the Stetler Model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nurs Outlook, 2001, 49(6): 272-279.
11. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Welcome to the CFIR technical assistance website. Available at: http://www.cfirguide.org/.
12. Vandevanter N, Vu M, Nguyen A, et al. A qualitative assessment of factors influencing implementation and sustainability of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in Vietnam health centers. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 73.
13. Vandevanter N, Kumar P, Nguyen N, et al. Application of the consolidated framework for implementation research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system. Implement Sci, 2017, 12(1): 27.
14. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci, 2013, 8(1): 51.
15. Vidgen HA, Love PV, Wutzke SE, et al. A description of health care system factors in the implementation of universal weight management services for children with overweight or obesity: case studies from Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1): 109.
16. Garbutt JM, Dodd S, Walling E, et al. Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Bmc Family Practice, 2018, 19(1): 53.
17. Soi C, Gimbel S, Chilundo B, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine delivery in Mozambique: identification of implementation performance drivers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implement Sci, 2018, 13(1): 151.
18. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, et al. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci, 2016, 6(11): 72.
19. Means AR, Kemp CG, Gwayi-Chore MC, et al. Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 17.
20. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, et al. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci, 2019, 14(1): 42.
21. Hu J, Ruan H, Li Q, et al. Barriers and facilitators to effective procedural pain treatments for pediatric patients in the chinese context: a qualitative descriptive study. J Pediatr Nurs, 2020, 54: 78-85.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Interpretation of consolidate framework for implementation research (CFIR)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content