Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WANG Junman ^1,2 ,  WEN Jin ²

1. West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;
2. Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

WEN Jin, Email: huaxiwenjin@163.com

Keywords：

Health in all policies; Earthquake-stricken area; Delphi method; Index system; Analytic hierarchy process

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202104154

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To construct a health in all policies (HiAP) evaluation index system for earthquake-stricken areas based on national health policies.Methods From April to December 2020, this study combined the methods of comprehensive review of relevant literature, on the foundation of the evaluation indicators pool was preliminarily constructed. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to construct the evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas and analyzed the weights of indicators.Results A total of 5 first-level indicators (investment, action, short-term effect, medium-term effect, long-term effect), 15 second-level indicators, and 44 third-level indicators with satisfactory logical consistency of HiAP evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas had been constructed.Conclusions The HiAP evaluation indicators system constructed in this study can be used to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of HiAP earthquake-stricken areas.

Citation： WANG Junman, WEN Jin. Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(7): 754-759. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202104154 Copy

1.	中共中央, 国务院. “健康中国 2030”规划纲要, 2016. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
2.	World Health Organization, Ministry for Foreign affairs of Finland. Health in all policies - Seizing opportunities, implementing policies, 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330265_Health_in_All_Policies_seizing_opportunities_implementing_policies.
3.	汪志豪. 基于政策变迁分析的“将健康融入所有政策”实施策略研究. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2019.
4.	鲲鹏. 地震灾后医疗救助评估与政策研究. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2010.
5.	陈竺, 沈骥, 康均行, 等. 特大地震应急医学救援: 来自汶川的经验. 中国循证医学杂志, 2012, 12(4): 383-392.
6.	李国平, 彭思奇, 杨凌. 汶川地震灾后恢复重建政策的效应评价—基于四川省地震灾区受灾群众的视角. 软科学, 2013, 27(8): 132-135.
7.	侯水平. 汶川大地震灾后恢复重建相关重大问题研究. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2010.
8.	刘林霞. 新生儿危重症护理质量评价指标体系的构建. 上海: 复旦大学, 2014.
9.	曹茂林. 层次分析法确定评价指标权重及 Excel 计算. 江苏科技信息, 2012, (2): 39-40.
10.	邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
11.	Beretta R. A critical review of the Delphi technique. Nurse Res, 1996, 3(4): 79-89.
12.	王春枝, 斯琴. 德尔菲法中的数据统计处理方法及其应用研究. 内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
13.	田梅梅, 叶文琴. 肿瘤患者入住康复护理床位评价指标权重研究. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12(1): 38-42.
14.	李文英. 层次分析法(AHP 法)在工程项目风险管理中的应用. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, (1): 46-48, 66.
15.	吴殿廷, 李东方. 层次分析法的不足及其改进的途径. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 40(2): 264-268.
16.	Board, World Health Organization. Formulating strategies for health for all by the year 2000, 1979. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/154286/EB64_2_eng.pdf;jsessionid=54EB9FB0F135644A86F291D488292AED?sequence=1.
17.	World Health Organization, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland. Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework for country action, 2014. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506908.
18.	卢中南, 毛洁, 卢伟. “健康融于所有政策”在美国加州的实践和启示. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(6): 1060-1062, 1075.
19.	Ståhl T. Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to implementation and evaluation - the Finnish experience. Scand J Public Health, 2018, 46(20_suppl): 38-46.
20.	Kranzler Y, Davidovich N, Fleischman Y, et al. A health in all policies approach to promote active, healthy lifestyle in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res, 2013, 2(1): 16.
21.	Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, et al. Applying health in all policies to obesity in South Australia. Health Promot Int, 2016, 31(1): 44-58.
22.	Gase LN, Schooley T, Lee M, et al. A Practice-grounded approach for evaluating health in all policies initiatives in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2017, 23(4): 339-347.
23.	Kershaw P. A "health in all policies" review of Canadian public finance. Can J Public Health, 2020, 111(1): 8-20.
24.	World Health Organization. Finland curbs childhood obesity by integrating health in all policies, 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/finland-curbs-childhood-obesity-by-integrating-health-in-all-policies.
25.	华晓刚. 构建甘肃省“将健康融入所有政策”策略实施监测评价体系研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
26.	Stevenson A, Humphrey A, Brinsdon S. A health in all policies response to disaster recovery. Perspect Public Health, 2014, 134(3): 125-126.

1. 中共中央, 国务院. “健康中国 2030”规划纲要, 2016. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
2. World Health Organization, Ministry for Foreign affairs of Finland. Health in all policies - Seizing opportunities, implementing policies, 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330265_Health_in_All_Policies_seizing_opportunities_implementing_policies.
3. 汪志豪. 基于政策变迁分析的“将健康融入所有政策”实施策略研究. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2019.
4. 鲲鹏. 地震灾后医疗救助评估与政策研究. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2010.
5. 陈竺, 沈骥, 康均行, 等. 特大地震应急医学救援: 来自汶川的经验. 中国循证医学杂志, 2012, 12(4): 383-392.
6. 李国平, 彭思奇, 杨凌. 汶川地震灾后恢复重建政策的效应评价—基于四川省地震灾区受灾群众的视角. 软科学, 2013, 27(8): 132-135.
7. 侯水平. 汶川大地震灾后恢复重建相关重大问题研究. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2010.
8. 刘林霞. 新生儿危重症护理质量评价指标体系的构建. 上海: 复旦大学, 2014.
9. 曹茂林. 层次分析法确定评价指标权重及 Excel 计算. 江苏科技信息, 2012, (2): 39-40.
10. 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
11. Beretta R. A critical review of the Delphi technique. Nurse Res, 1996, 3(4): 79-89.
12. 王春枝, 斯琴. 德尔菲法中的数据统计处理方法及其应用研究. 内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
13. 田梅梅, 叶文琴. 肿瘤患者入住康复护理床位评价指标权重研究. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12(1): 38-42.
14. 李文英. 层次分析法(AHP 法)在工程项目风险管理中的应用. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, (1): 46-48, 66.
15. 吴殿廷, 李东方. 层次分析法的不足及其改进的途径. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 40(2): 264-268.
16. Board, World Health Organization. Formulating strategies for health for all by the year 2000, 1979. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/154286/EB64_2_eng.pdf;jsessionid=54EB9FB0F135644A86F291D488292AED?sequence=1.
17. World Health Organization, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland. Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework for country action, 2014. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506908.
18. 卢中南, 毛洁, 卢伟. “健康融于所有政策”在美国加州的实践和启示. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(6): 1060-1062, 1075.
19. Ståhl T. Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to implementation and evaluation - the Finnish experience. Scand J Public Health, 2018, 46(20_suppl): 38-46.
20. Kranzler Y, Davidovich N, Fleischman Y, et al. A health in all policies approach to promote active, healthy lifestyle in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res, 2013, 2(1): 16.
21. Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, et al. Applying health in all policies to obesity in South Australia. Health Promot Int, 2016, 31(1): 44-58.
22. Gase LN, Schooley T, Lee M, et al. A Practice-grounded approach for evaluating health in all policies initiatives in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2017, 23(4): 339-347.
23. Kershaw P. A "health in all policies" review of Canadian public finance. Can J Public Health, 2020, 111(1): 8-20.
24. World Health Organization. Finland curbs childhood obesity by integrating health in all policies, 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/finland-curbs-childhood-obesity-by-integrating-health-in-all-policies.
25. 华晓刚. 构建甘肃省“将健康融入所有政策”策略实施监测评价体系研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017.
26. Stevenson A, Humphrey A, Brinsdon S. A health in all policies response to disaster recovery. Perspect Public Health, 2014, 134(3): 125-126.

Previous Article
Tuina for children with acute diarrhea: an evidence-based clinical guideline
Next Article
The value of three triage methodologies for critically ill patients in earthquake mass casualty

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content