Bibliometric analysis of health technology assessment_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

BAI Fei ^1,2,3,4,5 , LI Meixuan ^1,2,3,4 , LI Rui ^2,3,4 , CAO liujiao ^2,3,4 , SHANG Wenru ^1,6 , XIN Tianjiao ² , CHEN Kaiyue ² , LI Yanfei ^1,2,3,4 , XING Xin ^1,7 ,  LI Xiuxia ^1,2,3,4 , YANG Kehu ^1,2,3,4

1. Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
4. Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
5. National Center for Medical Service Administration, Beijing 100000, P. R. China;
6. National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China;
7. School of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LI Xiuxia, Email: yangkh-ebm@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Health technology assessment; Bibliometric analysis; Research status; Theme analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202112008

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To analyze the research status and hot spots of health technology assessment (HTA). Methods Databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and PubMed were searched to collect published studies on HTA. The software of BICOMS-2 and VOSviewer 1.6.10 was used to draw the network diagram and to conduct cluster analysis of keywords. Results A total of 1170 studies in Chinese and 8584 studies in English were included. The number of HTA-related publications increased annually, among which countries with the most publications were the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Fudan University had the largest number of studies published in Chinese and York University had the largest number of studies published in English. The research topics mainly focused on hospital HTA, HTA decision transformation research, pharmacoeconomic evaluation, etc. The most frequent diseases were cancer and depression. Emerging keywords were real-word evidence, randomized controlled trials, cost-benefit analysis, etc. Conclusion HTA-related studies increase annually. Many HTA-related studies are performed in developed countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom. The relevant research topics involve hospital HTA, HTA decision-making transformation research, and pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Current research focus is on the evaluation of health economics in the field of cancer based on the evidence of real-world research and randomized controlled trials.

Citation： BAI Fei, LI Meixuan, LI Rui, CAO liujiao, SHANG Wenru, XIN Tianjiao, CHEN Kaiyue, LI Yanfei, XING Xin, LI Xiuxia, YANG Kehu. Bibliometric analysis of health technology assessment. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(4): 450-456. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202112008 Copy

1.	Chen Y, He Y, Chi X, et al. Development of health technology assessment in China: new challenges. Biosci Trends, 2018, 12(2): 102-108.
2.	朱文涛, 高海亮, 卢颖, 等. 药物经济学评价报告质量评估指南(PEERs)解读. 中国医疗保险, 2020, (6): 68-73.
3.	O'Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, et al. The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 187-190.
4.	吕兰婷, 施文凯, 林夏, 等. 基于国际经验的医院卫生技术评估实施路径研究. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 17-20.
5.	赵雨薇. 中医适宜技术评估体系构建及其应用研究. 太原: 山西中医药大学, 2017.
6.	Löblová O, Trayanov T, Csanádi M, et al. The emerging social science literature on health technology assessment: a narrative review. Value Health, 2020, 23(1): 3-9.
7.	刘文彬, 陈英耀, 茅艺伟, 等. 我国卫生技术评估研究质量影响因素的定性研究. 中国卫生质量管理, 2015, 22(2): 87-90.
8.	吕兰婷, 傅金澜, 林夏, 等. 中国医院卫生技术评估的困境与出路. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 7-10.
9.	唐慧, 沈晖, 李雅妮. 国内外卫生技术评估发展现状研究. 中国卫生产业, 2015, (5): 196-198.
10.	任明, 孙晓, 郭利平. 中国2006—2016年适宜卫生技术推广应用制约因素系统评价. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(6): 868-870.
11.	王重建, 于二曼, 宗上纲, 等. 农村适宜卫生技术推广应用影响因素分析. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(10): 1240-1241.
12.	Betts MB, Milev S, Hoog M, et al. Comparison of recommendations and use of cardiovascular risk equations by health technology assessment agencies and clinical guidelines. Value Health, 2019, 22(2): 210-219.
13.	Leelahavarong P, Doungthipsirikul S, Kumluang S, et al. Health technology assessment in Thailand: institutionalization and contribution to healthcare decision making: review of literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2019, 35(6): 467-473.
14.	Yao L, Sun R, Chen YL, et al. The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 74: 73-79.
15.	杨克虎. 循证社会科学的产生, 发展与未来. 图书与情报, 2018, (3): 1-10.
16.	Yan P, Yao L, Li H, et al. The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol, 2019, 109: 20-29.
17.	崔雷, 刘伟, 闫雷, 等. 文献数据库中书目信息共现挖掘系统的开发. 数据分析与知识发现, 2008, 24(8): 70-75.
18.	Bai J, Li W, Huang YM, et al. Bibliometric study of research and development for neglected diseases in the BRICS. Infect Dis Poverty, 2016, 5(1): 89.
19.	赵锐, 赵琨. 卫生技术评估走好中国特色发展之路. 中国卫生产业, 2019, (10): 76-78.
20.	朱笑笑, 糜泽花, 钱爱兵. 国际卫生技术评估发展路径识别. 医学信息学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 42-48.
21.	吕兰婷, 施文凯, 林夏, 等. 医院卫生技术评估的经济学评估探讨. 中华医院管理杂志, 2020, 36(2): 103-107.
22.	张海军, 梁云, 袁妮. 英国NICE罕见病用药卫生技术评估流程介绍及其启示. 中国新药杂志, 2018, 27(14): 1587-1594.
23.	赵琨, 肖月, 池延花, 等. 英国NICE技术评估和临床指南的实施对我们的启示. 中国卫生资源, 2011, 14(3): 193-195.
24.	陈英耀, 黄葭燕. 国际卫生技术评估新进展和热点问题. 中国卫生质量管理, 2011, (1): 1-3,7.
25.	赵琨, 隋宾艳, 郭武栋, 等. 卫生技术评估的国际经验及启示. 中国卫生经济, 2012, 31(2): 87-89.

1. Chen Y, He Y, Chi X, et al. Development of health technology assessment in China: new challenges. Biosci Trends, 2018, 12(2): 102-108.
2. 朱文涛, 高海亮, 卢颖, 等. 药物经济学评价报告质量评估指南(PEERs)解读. 中国医疗保险, 2020, (6): 68-73.
3. O'Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, et al. The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 187-190.
4. 吕兰婷, 施文凯, 林夏, 等. 基于国际经验的医院卫生技术评估实施路径研究. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 17-20.
5. 赵雨薇. 中医适宜技术评估体系构建及其应用研究. 太原: 山西中医药大学, 2017.
6. Löblová O, Trayanov T, Csanádi M, et al. The emerging social science literature on health technology assessment: a narrative review. Value Health, 2020, 23(1): 3-9.
7. 刘文彬, 陈英耀, 茅艺伟, 等. 我国卫生技术评估研究质量影响因素的定性研究. 中国卫生质量管理, 2015, 22(2): 87-90.
8. 吕兰婷, 傅金澜, 林夏, 等. 中国医院卫生技术评估的困境与出路. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 7-10.
9. 唐慧, 沈晖, 李雅妮. 国内外卫生技术评估发展现状研究. 中国卫生产业, 2015, (5): 196-198.
10. 任明, 孙晓, 郭利平. 中国2006—2016年适宜卫生技术推广应用制约因素系统评价. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(6): 868-870.
11. 王重建, 于二曼, 宗上纲, 等. 农村适宜卫生技术推广应用影响因素分析. 中国公共卫生, 2011, 27(10): 1240-1241.
12. Betts MB, Milev S, Hoog M, et al. Comparison of recommendations and use of cardiovascular risk equations by health technology assessment agencies and clinical guidelines. Value Health, 2019, 22(2): 210-219.
13. Leelahavarong P, Doungthipsirikul S, Kumluang S, et al. Health technology assessment in Thailand: institutionalization and contribution to healthcare decision making: review of literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2019, 35(6): 467-473.
14. Yao L, Sun R, Chen YL, et al. The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 74: 73-79.
15. 杨克虎. 循证社会科学的产生, 发展与未来. 图书与情报, 2018, (3): 1-10.
16. Yan P, Yao L, Li H, et al. The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol, 2019, 109: 20-29.
17. 崔雷, 刘伟, 闫雷, 等. 文献数据库中书目信息共现挖掘系统的开发. 数据分析与知识发现, 2008, 24(8): 70-75.
18. Bai J, Li W, Huang YM, et al. Bibliometric study of research and development for neglected diseases in the BRICS. Infect Dis Poverty, 2016, 5(1): 89.
19. 赵锐, 赵琨. 卫生技术评估走好中国特色发展之路. 中国卫生产业, 2019, (10): 76-78.
20. 朱笑笑, 糜泽花, 钱爱兵. 国际卫生技术评估发展路径识别. 医学信息学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 42-48.
21. 吕兰婷, 施文凯, 林夏, 等. 医院卫生技术评估的经济学评估探讨. 中华医院管理杂志, 2020, 36(2): 103-107.
22. 张海军, 梁云, 袁妮. 英国NICE罕见病用药卫生技术评估流程介绍及其启示. 中国新药杂志, 2018, 27(14): 1587-1594.
23. 赵琨, 肖月, 池延花, 等. 英国NICE技术评估和临床指南的实施对我们的启示. 中国卫生资源, 2011, 14(3): 193-195.
24. 陈英耀, 黄葭燕. 国际卫生技术评估新进展和热点问题. 中国卫生质量管理, 2011, (1): 1-3,7.
25. 赵琨, 隋宾艳, 郭武栋, 等. 卫生技术评估的国际经验及启示. 中国卫生经济, 2012, 31(2): 87-89.

Previous Article
Burden trend analysis of disease attributable to high low density lipoprotein cholesterol in Chinese population from 1990 to 2019
Next Article
Quality assessment for pediatric COVID-19 guidelines

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Bibliometric analysis of health technology assessment

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content