• 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
  • 2. The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
MAO Xiaorong, Email: mxr2013@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systematically review the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib (SORF) separately or combined in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods We searched the PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases for studies on HAIC and SORA separately or in combination in the treatment of advanced HCC from inception to November 1, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 21 studies involving 2 501 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), objective response rate (ORR) (OR=4.00, 95%CI 2.74 to 5.85, P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.75, P=0.004) were higher in the HAIC group than the SORF group, while the incidence of adverse reactions was not increased. However, HAIC combined with SORF showed no significant difference in OS, ORR, DCR or progression-free survival (PFS) compared with SORF alone. Moreover, combined treatment increased the adverse reactions of blood system. Conclusion  The current study suggests that HAIC can improve OS, ORR and DCR in patients with advanced HCC; however, there is no additional benefit when combining SORF with HAIC. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Citation: JIANG Ni, ZHONG Pengyu, LI Min, LI Junfeng, MAO Yongwu, CHEN Lin, MAO Xiaorong. Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(8): 901-907. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202112110 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of exercise intervention in adolescents with mild to moderate idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Efficacy and safety of medicines for restless legs syndrome: a network meta-analysis