• Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P. R. China;
WANG Yanping, Email: Wangyanping4816@163.com; SHI Nannan, Email: 13811839164@vip.126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systematically evaluate the quality of published pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines for neoplasms. Methods  Datasets including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMbase were searched to collect pharmacoeconomics studies of Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms from the establishment of the database to September 30, 2022. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) and quality of health economics studies (QHES) were used to evaluate the reporting quality and methodological quality. Results  A total of 25 studies were included, with an average CHEERS 2022 coincidence rate of 40.09% and an average QHES score of 53.2. Conclusion  The quantity and quality of pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms are insufficient and flawed. It is suggested to strenthen the collaboration between scientific research institutions and hospitals and standardize the pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms to provide hygienic decision-making evidence for Chinese patent medicines in neoplasms.

Citation: WANG Weili, ZHANG Haili, LIANG Ning, HU Ziteng, YANG Lu, SONG Tian, ZONG Xingyu, CAO Wenjie, YANG Yijiu, WANG Dingyi, CHEN Yaxin, WANG Yanping, SHI Nannan. Quality evaluation of pharmacoeconomics studies on Chinese patent medicines in neoplasm. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(5): 561-568. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202211054 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Health economic evaluation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review
  • Next Article

    Yiqi Fumai injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews