Interpretation of the instrument for evaluating clinical applicability of guidelines (version 2.0)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

DIAO Sha ^1,2,3,4 , LI Siyu ^1,2,3,4,5 , SHI Yuqing ^1,2,3,4,6 , LIU Zheng ^1,2,3,4,5 , KANG Deying ⁷ , LIU Guanjian ⁷ , ZHAO Rongsheng ⁸ , ZENG Linan ^1,2,3,4 , YI Qiusha ^1,2,3,4 , LI Hailong ^1,2,3,4 , HUANG Chao ⁹ ,  WANG Qiang ⁹ ,  ZHANG Lingli ^1,2,3,4,7

1. Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
2. Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
3. NMPA Key Laboratory for Technical Research on Drug Products in vitro and in vivo Correlation, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
4. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
5. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
6. West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
7. Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
8. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P. R. China;
9. Medical Management Service Guidance Center, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100044, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

WANG Qiang, Email: jason2019@sina.cn; ZHANG Lingli, Email: zhanglingli@scu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Clinical practice guidelines; Clinical applicability; Evaluation instrument (version 2.0); Interpretation

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202304080

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

The instrument for evaluating clinical applicability of guidelines (version 2.0) is designed to evaluate the clinical applicability of guidelines quantitatively. It is helpful to select guidelines with high clinical applicability and provide suggestions for revision. The evaluators are consistent with the target users of guidelines. The instrument consists of basic information, evaluation items and scoring scheme. The evaluation items are related to accessibility, readability, acceptability, feasibility and overall evaluation. Therefore, this article provides a detailed interpretation of the instrument and references for future users.

Citation： DIAO Sha, LI Siyu, SHI Yuqing, LIU Zheng, KANG Deying, LIU Guanjian, ZHAO Rongsheng, ZENG Linan, YI Qiusha, LI Hailong, HUANG Chao, WANG Qiang, ZHANG Lingli. Interpretation of the instrument for evaluating clinical applicability of guidelines (version 2.0). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(11): 1318-1322. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202304080 Copy

1.	Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press (U.S.), 2011: 4.
2.	曾力楠, 李幼平, 张伶俐, 等. 国内外制订临床指南的指南的循证评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(11): 1322-1330.
3.	曾力楠, 易秋莎, 张川, 等. 制订指南临床适用性评价工具. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(4): 466-475.
4.	李思雨, 刁莎, 石雨晴, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具(2.0版). 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(5): 597-605.
5.	李海龙, 张川, 黄超, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具信效度分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(4): 378-382.
6.	黄超, 李海龙, 张川, 等. 指南临床适用性评价实证研究: 以糖尿病指南临床适用性评价为例. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(5): 536-542.
7.	张川, 李海龙, 黄超, 等. 指南临床适用性评价实证研究: 以肾移植指南临床适用性评价为例. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(5): 543-550.
8.	张淼, 刁莎, 曾力楠, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具(2.0版)信效度分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(1): 80-84.
9.	刁莎, 杨梦婷, 曾力楠, 等. 医学评估量表用户手册撰写框架的定性系统评价. 医学新知, 2022, 32(1): 10-22.
10.	夏雷震. 问卷调查中量表缺失值填补方法的模拟比较研究. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2018.
11.	Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE Ⅱ: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010, 182(18): 839-842.

1. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press (U.S.), 2011: 4.
2. 曾力楠, 李幼平, 张伶俐, 等. 国内外制订临床指南的指南的循证评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(11): 1322-1330.
3. 曾力楠, 易秋莎, 张川, 等. 制订指南临床适用性评价工具. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(4): 466-475.
4. 李思雨, 刁莎, 石雨晴, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具(2.0版). 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(5): 597-605.
5. 李海龙, 张川, 黄超, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具信效度分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(4): 378-382.
6. 黄超, 李海龙, 张川, 等. 指南临床适用性评价实证研究: 以糖尿病指南临床适用性评价为例. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(5): 536-542.
7. 张川, 李海龙, 黄超, 等. 指南临床适用性评价实证研究: 以肾移植指南临床适用性评价为例. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(5): 543-550.
8. 张淼, 刁莎, 曾力楠, 等. 指南临床适用性评价工具(2.0版)信效度分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(1): 80-84.
9. 刁莎, 杨梦婷, 曾力楠, 等. 医学评估量表用户手册撰写框架的定性系统评价. 医学新知, 2022, 32(1): 10-22.
10. 夏雷震. 问卷调查中量表缺失值填补方法的模拟比较研究. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2018.
11. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE Ⅱ: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010, 182(18): 839-842.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Interpretation of the instrument for evaluating clinical applicability of guidelines (version 2.0)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content