Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WANG Yan ^1,2,3 , WANG Ziyi ^1,2,3 , XU Zihan ⁴ , LIU Wendi ^1,2,3 , XU Meng ^1,2,3 ,  LI Xiuxia ^1,2,3 ,  YANG Kehu ^2,3

1. Evidence Based Social Science Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
4. School of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LI Xiuxia, Email: lixiuxia@lzu.edu.cn; YANG Kehu, Email: yangkh-ebm@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Acupuncture therapy; Network meta-analysis; Reporting guideline; Delphi method

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202305130

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To select the key questions of the reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis. Methods A question pool about reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis was conducted by preliminary literature research and qualitative systematic review. A correspondence questionnaire was designed and the selection of key questions was carried out through two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. Results A total of 21 key questions were selected for the network meta-analysis report standard of acupuncture, including whether to report details of acupuncture interventions (e.g., needle type, acupoints used, number of needles inserted, depth of needle insertion, retention time, needling techniques, and treatment duration), diagnostic criteria for diseases or traditional Chinese medicine syndromes, and qualifications of acupuncture practitioners. Of these, the only three key questions answered by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were summary, protocol and registration, and source of funding, while the remaining 19 were specific to acupuncture-related report standards. Conclusion The conducted key question on reporting guideline of acupuncture network meta-analysis can improve the standardization and rigor of relevant research and better utilize its academic and clinical value.

Citation： WANG Yan, WANG Ziyi, XU Zihan, LIU Wendi, XU Meng, LI Xiuxia, YANG Kehu. Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(12): 1442-1448. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202305130 Copy

1.	Corbett MS, Rice SJ, Madurasinghe V, et al. Acupuncture and other physical treatments for the relief of pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(9): 1290-1298.
2.	Liu Y, Zhang R, Huang J, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e113172.
3.	雷从杰, 黄依杰, 钟冬灵, 等. 针刺治疗失眠的系统评价报告质量的评价. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2021, 41(8): 1010-1016.
4.	Bae K, Shin IS. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 2021, 45: 101459.
5.	王瑞奇, 吴清忠, 黄春华, 等. 4种针刺疗法治疗中风后肩手综合征的网状Meta分析. 中国针灸, 2021, 41(5): 563-569.
6.	袁龙, 刘鹏, 李冰融, 等. 针灸相关疗法治疗卵巢早衰疗效的网状Meta分析. 上海中医药杂志, 2022, 56(1): 19-27.
7.	王小琴. 针刺系统评价与Meta分析报告指南的循证研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.
8.	Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2019, 19(1): 208.
9.	Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin (Barc), 2016, 147(6): 262-266.
10.	叶子, 魏绪强, 冯寿全, 等. 针刺治疗术后肠梗阻的系统评价再评价. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2022, 24(2): 867-877.
11.	罗月红, 刘庆, 金芮玉, 等. 针刺治疗癌性疼痛的系统评价再评价. 按摩与康复医学, 2022, 13(9): 40-45.
12.	韩富华, 孙林娟, 张允岭, 等. 针刺治疗血管性认知障碍的系统评价再评价. 中国针灸, 2022, 42(1): 109-115.
13.	刘锐芮, 高静, 柏丁兮, 等. 不同针灸疗法治疗寻常痤疮的网状Meta分析. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2022, 24(2): 878-889.
14.	梁吉, 韩名媛, 罗铮, 等. 8种针灸疗法治疗原发性痛经的网状Meta分析. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2021, 23(12): 4593-4605.
15.	王图南, 赵珈宇, 杨易陈, 等. 针灸治疗干眼的网状Meta分析. 针刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1057-1066.
16.	付盈悦, 罗明鸿, 向开维. 不同针刺疗法对比康复疗法治疗中风后肩手综合征: 网状Meta分析. 中医临床研究, 2021, 13(30): 46-51.
17.	黎晓静, 张志玲, 黄培颖, 等. 针灸相关疗法治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱贝叶斯网状Meta分析. 陕西中医, 2021, 42(7): 967-973.
18.	孙忠人, 王承斌, 尹洪娜, 等. 针灸治疗变应性鼻炎网状Meta分析. 中国针灸, 2021, 41(11): 1295-1302.
19.	李秀霞, 郭康乐, 商雪, 等. 针刺临床有效性优势病症的系统评价再评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(6): 703-709.
20.	Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(8): 684-706.
21.	练璐, 李心怡, 邹慕蓉, 等. 应用改良德尔菲法构建我国家庭医生卫生服务能力指标体系. 中国卫生资源, 2021, 24(4): 448-452.
22.	Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 1995, 311(7001): 376-380.
23.	de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach, 2005, 27(7): 639-643.
24.	周坤, 车国卫. 肺癌患者术后症状量表的建立和评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(10): 1157-1163.
25.	任玲, 何竟. 运用德尔菲法构建脑外伤康复医学数据库核心条目. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(5): 609-613.
26.	Zhang D, Yan Y, Liao MX, et al. How to evaluate surgical tourism service organizations in China: indicators system development and a pilot application. Glob Health Res Policy, 2022, 7(1): 26.
27.	李建生, 谢洋, 李宣霖, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎患者出院时状态评估的专家问卷分析. 中医学报, 2020, 35(6): 1131-1136.
28.	刘晓, 彭滟, 张巾英, 等. 促进社区居民脑健康的运动干预方案的构建. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(13): 1590-1597.
29.	魏巍, 荆鲁, 徐凤芹. 利用德尔菲法确立心血瘀阻证诊断标准. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2010, 30(6): 585-588.
30.	曾光. 现代流行病学方法与应用. 北京: 北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社, 1994.
31.	冯贞贞, 李建生, 谢洋, 等. 基于德尔菲法的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疗效满意度问卷的修订. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2020, (1): 60-63.
32.	杜晓菲, 景丽伟, 王晴, 等. 医养院服务质量评价指标体系的构建. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(2): 194-198.
33.	刘贝贝, 柳桢, 许志远, 等. 基于德尔菲法的城市社区老年人健康综合评估量表的构建. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(1): 60-65.
34.	Zhang L, Guo X, Yang S, et al. Application of the Delphi method in the construction of an evaluating and grading scale for evidence of disease prevention and treatment in ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 3674663.
35.	Li J, Xu M, Jiang Y. Building a personalized patient education model for general practice by Delphi method. Fam Pract, 2023, 40(1): 105-112.
36.	Tan X, Ning N, Hua N, et al. Determining the core competencies for international postgraduate nursing students in internship programs: a delphi study. Nurse Educ Pract, 2023, 70: 103654.
37.	黄迪. 临床路径报告量表的制订. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016.
38.	尹森林, 刘雪梅, 何林, 等. 对系统评价/Meta分析报告规范的系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(8): 971-977.
39.	王艳, 姚仁斌. 浅议国内应建立规范的Meta分析中文注册平台. 中国传媒科技, 2021, (7): 94-96.

1. Corbett MS, Rice SJ, Madurasinghe V, et al. Acupuncture and other physical treatments for the relief of pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(9): 1290-1298.
2. Liu Y, Zhang R, Huang J, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e113172.
3. 雷从杰, 黄依杰, 钟冬灵, 等. 针刺治疗失眠的系统评价报告质量的评价. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2021, 41(8): 1010-1016.
4. Bae K, Shin IS. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 2021, 45: 101459.
5. 王瑞奇, 吴清忠, 黄春华, 等. 4种针刺疗法治疗中风后肩手综合征的网状Meta分析. 中国针灸, 2021, 41(5): 563-569.
6. 袁龙, 刘鹏, 李冰融, 等. 针灸相关疗法治疗卵巢早衰疗效的网状Meta分析. 上海中医药杂志, 2022, 56(1): 19-27.
7. 王小琴. 针刺系统评价与Meta分析报告指南的循证研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.
8. Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2019, 19(1): 208.
9. Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin (Barc), 2016, 147(6): 262-266.
10. 叶子, 魏绪强, 冯寿全, 等. 针刺治疗术后肠梗阻的系统评价再评价. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2022, 24(2): 867-877.
11. 罗月红, 刘庆, 金芮玉, 等. 针刺治疗癌性疼痛的系统评价再评价. 按摩与康复医学, 2022, 13(9): 40-45.
12. 韩富华, 孙林娟, 张允岭, 等. 针刺治疗血管性认知障碍的系统评价再评价. 中国针灸, 2022, 42(1): 109-115.
13. 刘锐芮, 高静, 柏丁兮, 等. 不同针灸疗法治疗寻常痤疮的网状Meta分析. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2022, 24(2): 878-889.
14. 梁吉, 韩名媛, 罗铮, 等. 8种针灸疗法治疗原发性痛经的网状Meta分析. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2021, 23(12): 4593-4605.
15. 王图南, 赵珈宇, 杨易陈, 等. 针灸治疗干眼的网状Meta分析. 针刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1057-1066.
16. 付盈悦, 罗明鸿, 向开维. 不同针刺疗法对比康复疗法治疗中风后肩手综合征: 网状Meta分析. 中医临床研究, 2021, 13(30): 46-51.
17. 黎晓静, 张志玲, 黄培颖, 等. 针灸相关疗法治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱贝叶斯网状Meta分析. 陕西中医, 2021, 42(7): 967-973.
18. 孙忠人, 王承斌, 尹洪娜, 等. 针灸治疗变应性鼻炎网状Meta分析. 中国针灸, 2021, 41(11): 1295-1302.
19. 李秀霞, 郭康乐, 商雪, 等. 针刺临床有效性优势病症的系统评价再评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(6): 703-709.
20. Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(8): 684-706.
21. 练璐, 李心怡, 邹慕蓉, 等. 应用改良德尔菲法构建我国家庭医生卫生服务能力指标体系. 中国卫生资源, 2021, 24(4): 448-452.
22. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 1995, 311(7001): 376-380.
23. de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach, 2005, 27(7): 639-643.
24. 周坤, 车国卫. 肺癌患者术后症状量表的建立和评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(10): 1157-1163.
25. 任玲, 何竟. 运用德尔菲法构建脑外伤康复医学数据库核心条目. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(5): 609-613.
26. Zhang D, Yan Y, Liao MX, et al. How to evaluate surgical tourism service organizations in China: indicators system development and a pilot application. Glob Health Res Policy, 2022, 7(1): 26.
27. 李建生, 谢洋, 李宣霖, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎患者出院时状态评估的专家问卷分析. 中医学报, 2020, 35(6): 1131-1136.
28. 刘晓, 彭滟, 张巾英, 等. 促进社区居民脑健康的运动干预方案的构建. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(13): 1590-1597.
29. 魏巍, 荆鲁, 徐凤芹. 利用德尔菲法确立心血瘀阻证诊断标准. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2010, 30(6): 585-588.
30. 曾光. 现代流行病学方法与应用. 北京: 北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社, 1994.
31. 冯贞贞, 李建生, 谢洋, 等. 基于德尔菲法的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疗效满意度问卷的修订. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2020, (1): 60-63.
32. 杜晓菲, 景丽伟, 王晴, 等. 医养院服务质量评价指标体系的构建. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(2): 194-198.
33. 刘贝贝, 柳桢, 许志远, 等. 基于德尔菲法的城市社区老年人健康综合评估量表的构建. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(1): 60-65.
34. Zhang L, Guo X, Yang S, et al. Application of the Delphi method in the construction of an evaluating and grading scale for evidence of disease prevention and treatment in ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 3674663.
35. Li J, Xu M, Jiang Y. Building a personalized patient education model for general practice by Delphi method. Fam Pract, 2023, 40(1): 105-112.
36. Tan X, Ning N, Hua N, et al. Determining the core competencies for international postgraduate nursing students in internship programs: a delphi study. Nurse Educ Pract, 2023, 70: 103654.
37. 黄迪. 临床路径报告量表的制订. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016.
38. 尹森林, 刘雪梅, 何林, 等. 对系统评价/Meta分析报告规范的系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(8): 971-977.
39. 王艳, 姚仁斌. 浅议国内应建立规范的Meta分析中文注册平台. 中国传媒科技, 2021, (7): 94-96.

Previous Article
Research on the overlap between Chinese systematic reviews and Cochrane reviews
Next Article
Evidence reporting norms for acupuncture therapy research: a structural analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content