WANG Yaqi 1,2 , GAO Yicheng 1,2 , SU Chengyuan 1,2 , LIU Meijun 1,2 , LI Xun 1,2,3 , FEI Yutong 1,2,3
  • 1. Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, P. R. China;
  • 2. Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, P. R. China;
  • 3. Beijing GRADE Center, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, P. R. China;
FEI Yutong, Email: feiyt@bucm.edu.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

In the process of guideline development and construction of clinical questions, it is necessary to guide clinicians to propose clinical problems into PICO (population, intervention, control, outcome) structured clinical questions. However, there are still unclear criteria to define and judge the appropriateness of the width of the PICO elements of a clinical question. Either too wide or too narrow can make the PICO question unsuitable to be a question for clinical practice guidelines to answer. We graded the clinical questions to be eight grades (3, 2, 1, 0, −1, −2, −3, mixed) according to the number of the PIC elements, which obviously needed to be adjusted to evaluate applicability of the appropriateness of the width of the clinical questions. Our work can provide methodological references for clinicians and guideline developers.

Citation: WANG Yaqi, GAO Yicheng, SU Chengyuan, LIU Meijun, LI Xun, FEI Yutong. Structured grading and evaluation of clinical questions in clinical practice guidelines. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(7): 827-831. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202311037 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of yoga on type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with glycemia, lipid profile and anthropometric measure: an overview of systematic reviews
  • Next Article

    Quality assessment of Chinese clinical practice guidelines and consensus in orthopedics