• 1. Department of Periodontics, the First Affiliated Hospital / Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, P.R. China;
  • 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology & Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital / Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Stomatological Research Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830054, P.R. China;
  • 3. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, School of Stomatology, Tongji Medical College, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, P.R. China;
  • 4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumqi 830092, P.R. China;
  • 5. State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Traumatology & Orthognathic Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, P.R. China;
  • 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, P.R. China;
  • 7. School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, P.R. China;
LI Chenxi, Email: lichenximed@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To systematically review the survival rate of different vascularized bone flaps in mandibular defect repair and reconstruction by Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods The PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect clinical studies related to the objects from inception to February 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out applying R software. Results A total of 24 studies involving 1 615 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the respective survival rates of fibula free flap (FFF), deep circumferential iliac artery flap (DCIA), scapula flap, and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap (ORFF) were 95.62%, 94.09%, 98.16%, and 93.75%. Moreover, the network meta-analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference between all comparators. Conclusion  Current evidence shows that different vascularized bone flaps have similar survival rates in mandibular defect repair and reconstruction. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.