APPLICATION OF POROUS TANTALUM IMPLANT IN TREATMENT OF BONE DEFECT_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

LU Jian , ZHENG Xiaoping , WANG Zhiqiang

Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei United University, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.;

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

Porous tantalum implant; Bone defect; Revision arthroplasty; Bone tumor

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

【Abstract】 Objective To review the progress in the treatment of bone defect by porous tantalum implant. Methods Recent l iterature was extensively reviewed and summarized, concerning the treatment method of bone
defect by porous tantalum implant. Results By right of their unique properties, porous tantalum implants have achieved
very good results in the treatment of certain types of bone defects. Conclusion Porous tantalum implants have their own
advantages and disadvantages. If the case is meet to its indications, this method can obtain a good effect. Porous tantalum implants provide a new way for the cl inical treatment of bone defects.

Citation： LU Jian,ZHENG Xiaoping,WANG Zhiqiang. APPLICATION OF POROUS TANTALUM IMPLANT IN TREATMENT OF BONE DEFECT. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012, 26(2): 244-247. doi: Copy

1.	梁卫东, 王宏伟, 王志强. 不同骨组织工程支架材料的生物安全性及性能. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(34): 6385-6388.
2.	Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86-A Suppl 2: 123-129.
3.	Balla VK, Bodhak S, Bose S, et al. Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: Fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. Acta Biomater, 2010, 6(8): 3349-3359.
4.	Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, et al. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 28(8): 1245-1250.
5.	Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, et al. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty ? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2): 459-465.
6.	Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty, 1994, 9(1): 33-44.
7.	Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(8): 1002-1009.
8.	Kim WY, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, et al. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results. Hip Int, 2008, 18(1): 17-22.
9.	Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2): 83-86.
10.	Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(1): 199-205.
11.	Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, et al. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(6 Suppl): 64-68.
12.	Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2): 87-90.
13.	Howard JL, Kudera J, Lewallen DG, et al. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(5): 478-484.
14.	Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, et al. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty ? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(6): 1709-1715.
15.	Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2008, 90(1): 78-84.
16.	Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, (446): 83-92.
17.	Nasser S, Poggie RA. Revision and salvage patellar arthoplasty using a porous tantalum implant. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(5): 562-572.
18.	Holt GE, Christie MJ, Schwartz HS. Trabecular metal endoprosthetic limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb. J Arthroplasty, 2009 24(7): 1079-1085.
19.	Economopoulos K, Barker L, Beauchamp C, et al. Case report: reconstruction of the distal tibia with porous tantalum spacer after resection for giant cell tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(6): 1697-1701.
20.	Troyer J, Levine BR. Proximal tibia reconstruction with a porous tantalum cone in a patient with Charcot arthropathy. Orthopedics, 2009, 32(5): 358.
21.	Dennis DA. The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2002, 17(4 Suppl 1): 90-93.
22.	Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, et al. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J, 2006, 2(1): 70-72.
23.	Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, (240): 129-136.
24.	Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2009, 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1: 131-138.

1. 梁卫东, 王宏伟, 王志强. 不同骨组织工程支架材料的生物安全性及性能. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(34): 6385-6388.
2. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86-A Suppl 2: 123-129.
3. Balla VK, Bodhak S, Bose S, et al. Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: Fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. Acta Biomater, 2010, 6(8): 3349-3359.
4. Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, et al. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 28(8): 1245-1250.
5. Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, et al. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty ? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2): 459-465.
6. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty, 1994, 9(1): 33-44.
7. Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(8): 1002-1009.
8. Kim WY, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, et al. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results. Hip Int, 2008, 18(1): 17-22.
9. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2): 83-86.
10. Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(1): 199-205.
11. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, et al. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(6 Suppl): 64-68.
12. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2): 87-90.
13. Howard JL, Kudera J, Lewallen DG, et al. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(5): 478-484.
14. Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, et al. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty ? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(6): 1709-1715.
15. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2008, 90(1): 78-84.
16. Radnay CS, Scuderi GR. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, (446): 83-92.
17. Nasser S, Poggie RA. Revision and salvage patellar arthoplasty using a porous tantalum implant. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(5): 562-572.
18. Holt GE, Christie MJ, Schwartz HS. Trabecular metal endoprosthetic limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb. J Arthroplasty, 2009 24(7): 1079-1085.
19. Economopoulos K, Barker L, Beauchamp C, et al. Case report: reconstruction of the distal tibia with porous tantalum spacer after resection for giant cell tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(6): 1697-1701.
20. Troyer J, Levine BR. Proximal tibia reconstruction with a porous tantalum cone in a patient with Charcot arthropathy. Orthopedics, 2009, 32(5): 358.
21. Dennis DA. The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2002, 17(4 Suppl 1): 90-93.
22. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, et al. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J, 2006, 2(1): 70-72.
23. Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, (240): 129-136.
24. Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2009, 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1: 131-138.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

APPLICATION OF POROUS TANTALUM IMPLANT IN TREATMENT OF BONE DEFECT

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content