• Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China.;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To investigate the operative procedure and the effectiveness of eosinophil ic granuloma (EG) of long bones in children. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2009, 14 patients with EG of long bones were treated. There were 9 boys and 5 girls, aged from 1 to 13 years (mean, 6.5 years). The locations were femur in 5 cases, humerus in 4 cases, tibia in 2 cases, fibula in 1 case, and femur compl icated with tibia in 2 cases. The disease duration was
7 days to 10 months (median, 2 months). X-ray films showed that osteolytic destruction had clear boundary, which did not
involve the epi physeal plate. Of 14 cases, 12 cases of tumor were treated by curettage, autologous il iac bone or combined artificial bone graft repair, and 2 cases were treated by resection, autologous il iac reconstruction, plate and screw fixation. Five cases compl icated with pathological fracture underwent reduction and fixation. Results All cases were diagnosed pathologically as having EG. All incisions healed by first intention. A total of 12 patients were followed up 1 to 4 years (mean, 2 years). The X-ray films showed tumor focus and pathological fracture healed within 3 to 4 months (mean, 3.5 months). Tibial lesion was found in 1 case of femoral tumor after 8 months, and was curred after reoperation. No recurrence occurred in other 11 cases. According to comprehensive assessing standard of X-ray film and joint function, the results of all cases were excellent. Conclusion EG of long bones in children is more common in the femur and humerus. Tumor curettage and autologous il iac bone graft repair is an effective method, and postoperative prognosis is good. There may be multiple lesions, so long-term follow-up is needed.

Citation: JIANG Xin,TANG Xueyang,WANG Daoxi,CHEN Xiaoliang,LIU Lijun.. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF EOSINOPHILIC GRANULOMA OF LONG BONES IN CHILDREN. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011, 25(6): 653-655. doi: Copy