Objective To investigate the relationship between the initial stabil ity and infected loosening of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) prosthesis. Methods From January 2000 to December 2008, 110 cases (110 hips) were treated with THA revision. Among them, 15 cases (15 hips) were confirmed infected loosening. There were 8 males and 7 females with an
average age of 62 years (range 42-75 years). The infected signs were found from 6 months to 2 years after initial THA. All of them had Tsukayama type IV and late infection, including 6 cases of acetabular infected loosening (5 cases of one-stage and 1 case of two-stage acetabular revision), 7 cases of simple infected loosening of femoral prosthesis (4 cases of one-stage and 3 cases of twostage femoral prosthesis revision), and 2 cases of joint capsule infection and sinus without prosthesis loosening (debridement and continuous irrigation). Results All incisions healed by first intention. Fifteen patients were followed up for 12 to 36 months (average 24 months). In 13 cases of revision, postoperative X-ray films showed that femoral acetabular prostheses were in good position, and had no cl inical and imaging infective signs of loosening. In 2 cases of joint capsule infection, sinus recurred 6 months postoperation without hip joint pain, the function of weight-bearing and walking of hip joint was normal. Harris score increased from preoperative average of 42 to postoperative average of 85; the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 4 cases. Conclusion The infection of THA may occur in the whole joint, half-joint or just in joint capsule. The initial stabil ity of the prosthesis would affect the long-term survival of the prothesis. If the prosthesis initial stabil ity is obtained, even if there are infective factors, infections would also be l imited.
Citation： SUN Yongqiang,AI Jinwei,CAO Yujing,LIU Ruyin,WANG Shangzeng,WANG Xibin.. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INITIAL STABILITY AND INFECTED LOOSENING OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROSTHESIS. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010, 24(3): 274-277. doi: Copy