To investigate the immunoreaction, histological reaction and turnover by comparing the xenotransplantation of fresh human amniotic membrane (HAM) with that of preserved HAM, and to analyze the cl inical appl ication value of different kinds of HAM preparations. Methods Subcutaneous implant models were establ ished in 150 BALB/C mice, which were randomized into 5 groups of 30 mice each, based on different implants: fresh amniotic membrane (FAM), double fresh amniotic membrane (DFAM), glycerin preserved amniotic membrane (GPAM), chorion (positive control) or merely operation (negative control). The tissue samples from grafted area were observed with SABC and HE staining, and the inflammatory cells were calculated with l ight microscopy. 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery. Results The mice in all of groups were normal in eating and moving, and the wound surface healed well. In all of AM groups, the expression of MHC Ⅱ and the calculation of inflammatory cells were much less than those in chorion groups, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.01). At 1, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery, there were no significant differences in the expression of MHC Ⅱ and the calculation of inflammatory cells in all of AM groups, compared with other groups (P gt; 0.05). From 2 weeks to 4 weeks after surgery, there were no significant differences in the expression of MHC Ⅱ and the calculation of inflammatory cells between FAM and DFAM groups (P gt; 0.05), but they were both more than those in GPAM groups, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). At the 4th week after surgery, in all of AM groups, the expression of MHC Ⅱ and the calculation of inflammatory cells were less than those at the 2nd week, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.01).The amniotic epithel ium was still al ive in fresh AM groups until 4 weeks after transplantation. Early after surgery, fibroblasts infiltrated AM from the substantia basilaris layer while made fibrous capsule around the epithel ium. After 12 weeks, the amnion absorbed. Conclusion As a kind of heterologous biomaterial, whether fresh or preserved, HAM can be seemedof ideal immunocompatibil ity and histocompatibil ity. Fresh HAM with al ive epithel ium may be more successful in area of
repair and reconstruction.
Citation： ZHANG Qi,ZHAO Min,HU Ke,LI Hong,LU Jing,QIN Yingxiang.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON IMMUNOCOMPATIBILITY AND HISTOLOGICAL TURNOVER AFTER FRESH ORPRESERVED HUMAN AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE XENOTRANSPLANTATION. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008, 22(5): 619-624. doi: Copy