• 1Department of Orthopaedic Trauma &;
  • Microsurgery, 2Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen university, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510080, P.R.China.;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To evaluate the value of MRI in diagnosis of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy pre-gangl ionic injury. Methods From November 2006 to February 2008, 10 patients with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy were treated, 8 males and 2 females, aged from 2 months to 3 years (11.4 months on average). There were 7 cases of left side and 3 of right side.
According to Tassin classification, 2 cases were type II, 6 type III and 2 type IV. All patients were performed MRI examinations before the operation, whose results were compared with those of exploration during the operation. Results MRI examinations showed 1 patient was normal and 9 patients had post-traumatic spinalmeningolcele. The 6 patients had displacement of spinal cord (4 towards the healthy side and 2 towards the sick side), 6 had deformity of spinal cord, and 2 had avulsed nerve root thickening. MRI detected 19 nerve roots were positive, 16 were true positive and 3 false positive in surgical exploration. MRI detected 6 nerve roots were negative, 4 were true negative and 2 false negative in surgical exploration. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy pre-gangl ionic injury were 84.2%, 80.0% and 83.3%, respectively. There were significant differences in the results by preoperative MRI examinations and by exploration during the operation (P  lt; 0.05). Conclusion MRI can show pre-gangl ionic injury of brachial plexus of the patients with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy and can supply references for early diagnosis and operation time. MRI can be routinely conducted as a preoperative examination.

Citation: QIN Bengang,GU Liqiang,LIU Xiaolin,ZHANG Zhongwei,XIANG Jianping,WANG Honggang,FU Guo. VALUE OF MRI IN DIAGNOSIS OF OBSTETRICAL BRACHIAL PLEXUS PALSY PRE-GANGLIONIC INJURY. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008, 22(12): 1455-1457. doi: Copy