• Arthritis Clinical and Research Cent er, People’s Hospital, Peking University, Beijing,100044, P.R.China.;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To investigate the rotational mismatch of total kneereplacement with medial 1/3 of tibial tuberosity as bony landmark in osteoarthritic patients with varus or valgus deformity. Methods Axial images on computed tomography of 62 knees (including 55 varus deformities and 7 valgus deformities) in 32 Chinese osteoarthritic patients who had total knee arthroplasty were analyzed, compared with that of 10 healthy knees. On images of the distal femur, the angle between the lines of surgical epicondylar axis(SEA) and posterior condylar axis was measured as posterior condylar angle (PCA), and on images of the proximal tibia, a baseline for the anteriorposterior axis of each component was drawn based on the SEA for the femur and the medial 1/3 of the tibial tuberosity for the tibia. The angle between these lines (Angle α) was defined as therotational mismatch between the components when they were aligned to the anatomic landmarks of each bone. Results The sulcus of medial epicondyle of femur could be identified on CT images of over 80% osteoarthritic knees; the median value of PCA was +2.36°, with an individual variation of 0° to +7.5°. Angle α was +6.45±3.68°(range, 0° to +11.8°) in 10 healthy knees, which increased significantly to +10.85±10.47°(range, 0° to +28.1°)in 55 varus knees (P<0.05), which also increased significantly to +11.6±7.3°(range, -6.5° to +26.8°) in 7 valgus knees (P< 0.05). Conclusion With the medial 1/3 of the tibial tuberosity as the rotational landmark for the tibial component, there was a tendency to align the tibial component in external rotational position relative to the femoral component in knees with normal alignment, the rotational mismatch increased in Chinese osteoarthritic knees with varus and valgus deformity.

Citation: SUN Tiezheng,LV Houshan,HONG Nan,et al.. ROTATIONAL LANDMARKS AND TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEES. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007, 21(3): 226-230. doi: Copy