1. |
Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, et al. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59: 234–240.
|
2. |
Bachmann LM, Coray R, Estermann P, et al. Diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2002, 9(6): 653–657.
|
3. |
Bachmann LM, Estermann P, Kronenberg C, et al. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc, 2003,91(3): 341-346.
|
4. |
Vincent S, Greenley S, Beaven O. Clinical Evidence diagnosis: Developing a sensitive search strategy to retrieve diagnostic studies on deep vein thrombosis: a pragmatic approach. Health Info Libr J, 2003, 20: 150–159.
|
5. |
Chalco JP, Huicho L, Alamo C, et al. Accuracy of clinical pallor in the diagnosis of anaemia in children: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr, 2005, 8(5): 46.
|
6. |
Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB for the Hedges Team. EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers. BMC Med, 2005, 29(3): 7.
|
7. |
Haynes RB, Wilczynski NC for the Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from MEDLINE: analytical survey. BMJ, 2004, 328(7447): 1040.
|
8. |
Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Dinnes J, et al. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technology Assessment, 2004, 8(25): iii, 1–234.
|
9. |
U.S. National Library of Medicine. Clinical queries [Internet]. 2007 Jan. Available from: URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/static/clinicaltable.html.
|