ObjectiveTo investigate the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) combined with three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE) in evaluating metastatic lymph nodes secondary to hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsFrom July 2009 to March 2011, DWI examination was performed in 37 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, which was compared with 3D-VIBE sequences. The morphological characteristics and distribution were analyzed for metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes. Signal intensity (SI) was measured on DWI images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated for each lymph node. The SI of lymph nodes (SILN) and liver (SIliver) were also measured and the ratio of SI was calculated. The ADC and the ratio of SI were compared between metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes. ResultsThere were fifty-nine groups of lymph nodes in 37 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, fifty-one groups were revealed in both DWI and 3D-VIBE sequences, and eight groups were only demonstrated in one sequence (P=0.070). The short diameters were (1.05±0.42) cm and (0.78±0.22) cm on 3D-VIBE images for metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes, respectively (P=0.030). The ADC value in metastatic lymph nodes was (1.64±0.3)×10-3 mm2/s, which was significantly lower than that in nonmetastatic lymph nodes 〔(2.28±0.79)×10-3 mm2/s〕 on DWI images (P=0.033). There were no significant differences in SILN/SIliver between metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes on images of portal venous phase and 3 min delayed contrast-enhanced phase. ConclusionsDifferences of ADC and short diameter can provide valuable information to differentiate metastatic lymph nodes with nonmetastatic lymph nodes. When combined with 3D-VIBE sequence, DWI is more effective in evaluating metastatic lymph nodes secondary to hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Citation: WU Dongsheng ,WANG Xiaodong,CHEN Weixia,PENG Jin,SU Wei,ZHANG Hongjing. DWI Combined with 3D-VIBE in Evaluating Metastatic Lymph Nodes Secondary to Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2011, 18(7): 773-778. doi: Copy