• 1.Department of Hepatobiliopancreatology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Kunming 650101, China;;
  • 2.The Organ Transplantation Center of 303 Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Nanning 530021, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To explore the relationship between acute rejection and expression levels of perforin mRNA in peripheral blood and bile after rat liver transplantation so as to look for a kind of noninvasive method to diagnose acute rejection.
Methods  Rat orthotopic liver transplantation model with biliary extra-drainage was established. They were divided into 4 groups: blank control group (n=20), isograft group (n=30), allograft plus cyclosporine A (CsA) group (n=30) and allograft group (n=30). Semi-quantatative RT-PCR was used to measure the expressions of perforin mRNA in bile and peripheral blood and the pathological changes of the graft were observed on postoperative days of 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10.
Results  Blank control group and isograft group showed no expression of perforin mRNA in peripheral blood. The expression of perforin mRNA of peripheral blood in allograft group could be detected on day 3 after transplantation and it gradually elevated on day 5 and remained in high level during 7-11 days. In allograft plus CsA group perforin mRNA of peripheral blood continuously expressed in a low level, and the level at the same time points was significantly different compared with allograft group (P<0.05). The expression of perforin mRNA in peripheral blood was analogous with the severity degree of histologic damage. The expression of perforin mRNA can not be found in bile.
Conclusion  The expression of perforin mRNA in the peripheral blood offers a sensitive and noninvasive means of monitoring acute rejection.

Citation: TANG Bo ,XIAO Shufeng,ZHANG Jie,TIAN Daguang,TANG Jihong,ZHU Hong,LI Tiehan,MA Junfeng. Relationship Between Acute Rejection and Expression of Perforin mRNA after Rat Liver Grafts. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2009, 16(8): 617-621. doi: Copy