west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword " 主动脉夹层" 3 results
  • Emergency Operation at Midnight Does Not Increase In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection

    Objective To compare surgical outcomes of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection between operations at midnight and daytime. Methods From January 2004 to March 2013,195 patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection received surgical treatment in Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing Cardiovascular Disease Hospital). Patients with identical or similar propensity scores were matched from 127 patients who underwent emergency operation at daytime and 68 patients who underwent emergency operation at midnight. A total of 58 pairs of matched patients which had the same or similar propensity score were selected in daytime surgery group (n=58,43 males and 15 females,47.7±14.6 years) and midnight surgery group (n=58,45 males and 13 females,48.3±14.6 years). Operation time,postoperative chest drainage,mechanical ventilation time,postoperative incidence of dialysis and tracheostomy,length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality were compared between the daytime group and midnight group. Results A total of 58 pair of patients were matched in this study. There was no statistical difference in postoperative incidence of tracheostomy [19.0% (11/58) vs. 6.9% (4/58),P=0.053] or in-hospital mortality [8.6% (5/58) vs. 6.9%(4/58),P=0.729] between the midnight group and daytime group. Operation time (485.7±93.5 minutes vs. 428.5±123.3 minutes,P=0.048),postoperative chest drainage (979.5±235.7 ml vs. 756.6±185.9 ml,P=0.031),mechanical ventilation time (67.9±13.8 hours vs. 55.7±11.9 hours,P=0.025),postoperative incidence of dialysis [17.2% (10/58) vs. 5.2%(3/58),P=0.039] and length of ICU stay (89.4±16.2 hours vs. 74.8±12.5 hours,P=0.023) of the midnight group weresignificantly longer or higher than those of the daytime group. A total of 107 patients were followed up for 4-6 months after discharge. During follow-up,there was no late death. Among the 13 patients who required postoperative dialysis,12 patientsno longer needed regular dialysis. Conclusion Emergency operation at midnight does not increase in-hospital mortalitybut increase some postoperative morbidity in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Whether at midnight or daytime,better preoperative preparation and surgeons’ vigor are needed for timely surgical treatment for patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 不同杂交方式治疗累及弓部的主动脉夹层

    目的 探讨不宜单独行腔内隔绝治疗、累及弓部的主动脉夹层杂交手术治疗方法及其疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2008年11月至2011年8月成都军区总医院15例累及弓部的主动脉夹层患者行杂交手术治疗的临床资料,其中男10例,女5例;年龄51~72 (58.2±7.2)岁。Stanford A型主动脉夹层4例,B型主动脉夹层11例,病变均累及主动脉弓。采用胸骨正中切口或加颈部切口行升主动脉至头臂动脉旁路移植、单纯颈部切口行头臂动脉间旁路移植,然后行股动脉切口逆行主动脉腔内覆膜支架植入。术后即刻行数字减影血管造影(DSA),术后3个月、术后1年和2年分别随访CT造影资料,观察支架和人工血管通畅情况。 结果 所有患者均成功完成手术,并植入覆膜支架。术中血管造影证实支架植入定位准确,支架无明显内漏和移位。主动脉夹层真腔血流恢复正常,旁路血管血流通畅,围术期无死亡和严重并发症发生。随访15例,随访时间3~20 (12.0±4.1)个月,所有患者均生存,恢复正常生活。术后3个月及术后1年、2年复查主动脉增强CT示:支架无移位和内漏,支架内及人工血管旁路血流通畅,未见脑部和肢体缺血征象。 结论 累及弓部的主动脉夹层可根据受累部位和程度采用不同的杂交手术方法,安全、有效,能明显减轻患者的创伤和痛苦,该方法扩大了介入覆膜支架腔内治疗的适应证,但远期疗效有待进一步观察。

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 腔内隔绝术、联合血管旁路移植术治疗主动脉夹层动脉瘤

    摘要:  目的 总结腔内隔绝术、联合血管旁路移植术治疗主动脉夹层动脉瘤的临床经验, 以提高其治疗效果。方法 自2002 年9 月至2006 年12 月, 共完成腔内隔绝术或联合血管旁路移植术8 例。对4 例近端支架固定区lt; 15mm的患者于腔内隔绝术前行椎动脉2左颈总动脉端侧吻合术1 例, 应用8mm 人工血管行左锁骨下动脉2左颈总动脉旁路移植术2 例, 左锁骨下动脉2左颈总动脉2右颈总动脉旁路移植术1 例, 手术后8~ 10d, 行腔内隔绝手术。4 例破口距左锁骨下动脉开口gt; 15mm 的患者直接行腔内隔绝手术。 结果 行血管旁路移植的4 例患者术后恢复良好, 术后8~ 10d行腔内隔绝手术, 8 例患者腔内隔绝手术操作顺利, 隔绝术后3~ 8d 出院, 无住院死亡。出院前增强CT 扫描无内漏发生。随访4 例, 随访时间2~ 48 个月, 其中1 例患者长期胸痛, 经对症处理胸痛缓解; 4 例患者夹层内血栓机化良好, 无内漏出现或夹层剥离的现象发生。 结论 腔内隔绝手术是一种创伤小、恢复快、疗效好的治疗方法, 腔内隔绝术联合血管旁路移植术治疗主动脉夹层动脉瘤, 扩大了腔内隔绝术的手术适应证。

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:08 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content