ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine and sodium valproate on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. MethodsA total of 186 postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy during August 2012 to August 2014 in our hospital were divided into levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group (n=98), and sodium valproate group (n=88) based on postoperative different antiepileptic drugs treatment. Antiepileptic treatment were followed up for 12~48 months.Curative effect and adverse reaction were observed. Reservation rates and incidence rates of adverse reaction were calculated in the two groups. ResultsIn levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group, EngelⅠratio was 72.4%(71), EngelⅡratio was 17.3%(17), EngelⅢratio was 7.1%(7), and EngelⅣratio was 3.2%(3);in sodium valproate group, EngelⅠratio was 67.0%(59), EngelⅡratio was 21.6%(19), EngelⅢratio was 9.1%(8), and EngelⅣratio was 2.3%(2), and the difference was not statistically significant in the same grade of two groups (P > 0.05).Reservation rate and incidence rate of adverse reaction in levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group were 90.8%(89) and 15.3%(15) respectively.While those in sodium valproate group were 80.7%(71) and 36.4%(32) respectively.The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLevetiracetam combined with lamotrigine treatment on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy may have better curative effects than sodium valproate treatment, and levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine has its advantage in reservation rate and less adverse reaction.
ObjectiveTo explore the inhibition action of valproic acid to inflammatory cells and smooth muscle cells then to find out that valproic acid (VPA) can repress rat thoracic aortic aneurysm or not. MethodsThe model of rat thoracic aortic aneurysm was built through the method of soaking the adventitia of artery using porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE). The rats were divided into three groups:a normal saline blank control group (a C group), an adventitia soaked PPE group (a P group), and adventitia soaked PPE plus intraperitoneal injection by injecting intraperitioneal VPA 200 mg/kg for seven days (a PV group).The animals of the three groups were all using vascular ultrasound to detect blood vessel diameter. Animals were killed after operation to observe the general morphology of vascular aneuysm and do the immunohistochemial, morphological, protein analysis of interleukin 1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), smooth muscle 22 alpha (SM22α), matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP-2), MMP-9 and Western blot by drawing animals on the 14th day. ResultsThe vessels diameter in the PV group was narrower than that in the P group (P value<0.05). HE staining, immunohistochemistry and Western blot displayed that the cells in the P group were in disorder arrangement and interstitial disorder while the cells in the PV group maintained better albumin layer. The protein expressions of IL-1, IL-6, MMP-2, and MMP-9 in the PV group decreased except that SM22α increased. ConclusionVPA can inhibit phenothpic transforming of aneurysm inflammatory cells and smooth muscle cells, reduce the levels of cell proliferation, decrease the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases, and depress tumor growth of rat thoracic aorta.
Objective The study was performed to compare the efficacy and effect on quality of life of sodium valproate (VPA) sustained-release tablets versus topiramate (TPM) in newly diagnosed adult symptomatic epilepsy. Methods This is aprospective, randomized controlled trial on 200 patients newly diagnosed as adult symptomatic epilepsy in Sichuan Province People’s Hospital druing September 2014 to December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into VPA group (n=110) and TPM group (n=90). Then we evaluated the efficacy, retention rate, adverse reactions, and quality of life of the two groups after one year of treatment. Results The total effective rate of VPA group was 69.1%, and the rate of no seizures was 38.2%; the total effective rate of TPM was 62.2%, and the rate of no seizures was 42.2%. No statistically significant difference in the effective rate and no seizure rate was found between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in the retention rate between the two groups(69.1% vs. 65.6%, P>0.05) . The incidence of adverse reactions of VPA was significantly lower than that of TPM (9.1%vs. 20%, P<0.05). The quality of life of the two groups was significantly improved from baseline before treatment. VPA group showed significantly better performance than TPM group on mood and cognitive improvement (P<0.05). Conclusion ① There was no significant difference in efficacy and retention rate between VPA sustained-release tablet and TPM on adult patients with symptomatic epilepsy after one year's treatment; ② The incidence of adverse reactions of TPM group was significantly higher than that of VPA group; ③ VPA sustained-release tablets and TPM can significantly improve the overall quality of life of patients, and VPA sustained-release tablets is significantly better than topiramate on the improvement of emotional and cognitive function.
Objective The aim of present study was to investigate the protective effect of vitamin U on renal toxicity induced by sodium valproate (VPA) and provide laboratory data for clinical application of VPA. Methods In this study, 48 female rats were used. These animals were randomly divided into 4 groups: control group (group A), vitamin U group (group B), VPA group (group C), vitamin U+ VPA group (group D). Group A was given the same amount of normal saline, group B was given Vit U 50 mg/(kg·d), group C was given VPA 300 mg/(kg·d) and group D was given Vit U 50 mg/(kg·d) firstly, then VPA 300 mg/(kg·d) after 1 hours by gavage. After 2 or 4 weeks of continuous administration, the kidneys were collected from these rats after blood collection. Total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), serum creatinine (Cr), urea (BUN) and uric acid (UA) were detected by automatic biochemical analyzer. Result ① Blood lipid. There were significant differences in TC and LDL between the group A and group C (P<0.05), and the level of TC and LDL in group C were significantly higher. ② Serum biochemical indexes of renal function. There was no significant difference in Cr, UA and BUN four groups at 2w (P>0.05). At 4w, compared with the other three groups, the Cr, BUN and UA level of VPA group were significantly higher (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference between the group A and the group D. ③ Pathological morphology of renal tissue. At 2w, there was no obvious abnormality in renal structures among the four groups. At 4w, inflammatory lesions were only seen in VPA group, and mild inflammatory cell infiltration were seen in other three groups. Conclusion VPA can lead to a higher level of blood lipid. The renal toxicity induced by VPA may have a certain relationship with the time of drug exposure, and vitamin U has a protective effect on the renal toxicity induced by VPA.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of valproic acid (VPA) coadministred with lamotrigine (LTG) on epileptic patients' ammonia and evaluate the influencing factors of elevated blood ammonia in epileptic patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical data from 146 patients with epilepsy (including newly diagnosed epilepsy patients) who were admitted to the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from May 2018 to April 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into no antiepileptic drug group (group A), VPA group only (group B) and VPA combined LTG group (group C), and the concentration of the blood ammonia of the patients were analyzed.ResultThe average ammonia levels in groups A, B and C were (18.14±1.19), (25.89±0.87) and (36.60±4.34) μmol/L, and the incidence of blood ammonia higher than normal were 2.77%, 8.89% and 20.0%, respectively.The difference between group B and group A and group C were statistically significant (P<0.05), the difference between group C and group A was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionPatients with epilepsy who use VPA were at increased risk of blood ammonia and LTG can increase ammonia in epileptic patients who were treated with VPA. So when VPA was combined with LTG, more attention should be paid to ammonia of patient to avoid adverse reactions.