ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes following emergency surgery or conservative treatment for patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma (IMH).MethodsClinical data of consecutive patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic IMH in our hospital from September 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients who met our surgical indications received surgery (an operation group) and other patients received strict conservative treatment (a conservative treatment group).ResultsFinally 127 patients were enrolled, including 112 males and 15 females with an average age of 53.6±13.0 years. Of 127 patients, 85 (66.9%) patients accepted emergency surgery and 42 (33.1%) patients accepted strict conservative treatment. There was no difference between the two groups in early mortality or complications (P＞0.05). The 5-year survival rate was 90.4% in the operation group and 74.3% in the conservative treatment group (P=0.010). A maximum aortic diameter in the ascending aorta and aortic arch≥45 mm and maximum thickness of IMH in the same section≥8 mm were risk factors for IMH-related death in patients undergoing conservative treatment (P＜0.001).ConclusionThe mortality associated with emergency surgery for patients with acute type A aortic IMH is satisfactory. In clinical centers with well-established surgical techniques and postoperative management, emergency surgical treatment may provide a better outcome than conservative treatment for patients with acute type A aortic IMH.
Aortic intramural hematoma and pulmonary embolism are two rapidly progressive and life-threatening diseases. A 65-year-old male patient with descending aortic intramural hematoma and pulmonary embolism underwent pulmonary embolectomy and descending aortic stent-graft placement, with good postoperative results.
Objective To assess the clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment in the second stage for patients with progression to local or full-length dissection-like changes at the distal aorta following initial surgery for aortic intramural hematoma. Methods Between July 2020 and December 2022, patients with aortic intramural hematoma were treated initially for proximal lesions. During follow-up, if the distal aortic hematoma was not resorbed and entry tears were identified with progression to local or full-length dissection-like changes and possible focal contrast enhancement, and the patients undergoing a second-stage stent intervention were retrospectively collected. Initial surgeries included total aortic arch replacement or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) targeting the proximal entry tear. In the secondary stage, stents were strategically placed in three delineated regions of the distal aorta to seal the entry tears, promote hematoma resorption, and induce thrombosis of the false lumen. Results A total of 18 patients were collected, including 15 males and 3 females with a mean age of 53.5±10.6 years, ranging from 39 to 76 years. All patients achieved procedural success, yielding a technical success rate of 100%. Intraoperative and postoperative imaging confirmed effective sealing of the distal entry tears without stent leakage, visceral branch stenosis, or occlusion, and there were no serious complications such as perioperative cerebral infarction, paraplegia, or organ ischemia. Follow-up assessments showed complete thrombosis and disappearance of the false lumen in all patients. Conclusion In patients with unresolved entry tears and dissection-like changes post-initial surgery for aortic intramural hematoma, secondary stent placement effectively seals these tears, promotes thrombosis and resorption of the hematoma, and improves endovascular remodeling of the aorta, demonstrating favorable short- to medium-term outcomes.