Abstract： Objective To summarize surgical results of secondary subaortic stenosis （SSS） after congenital heart disease （CHD） operations，and analyze the pathogenesis of SSS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 19 patients who underwent surgical repair for SSS in Guangdong General Hospital from 1st June 2008 to 31st December 2012. There were 10 males and 9 females. CHD types included double outlet right ventricle，ventricular septal defect and partial atrioventricular septal defect，et al. The median age of the patients when they received their first CHD operations was 4 months （15 days to 5 year and 11 months）. The median age of the patients when they received SSS repair was 5 years and 3 months （1 year to 15 years and 3 months）. The median time interval from CHD operation to SSS repair was 4 years and 10 months （8 months to 13 years and 11 months）. Results All the patients successfully received their SSS repair. There was no surgical death in this study. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 79 （39 to 172） minutes，and median aortic cross-clamp time was 42 （22 to 124） minutes. Median postoperative hospital stay was 7 （5 to 9） days. Postoperatively， 1 patient required permanent pacemaker implantation. All the patients were followed up after discharge for a median durationof 1 year and 10 months （5 months to 4 years and 4 months） . During follow-up， none of the patients had any clinical symptom，their heart function was normal，and there was no late death. One patient received another subaortic stenosis repair for gradually aggravating left ventricular outflow tract stenosis. Conclusions SSS is very rare after CHD operations. The pathogenesis of SSS is perhaps related to abnormal blood flows in the left ventricular outflow tract after CHD operations. The pathogenesis time of SSS and types of CHD leading to SSS cannot be predicted. Subaortic stenosis repair is a simple and safe procedure for SSS，but postoperatively left ventricular outflow tract stenosis may appear and aggravate again.
Subvalvar aortic stenosis (SAS) refers to a type of disease in which the stenosis of the left ventricular outflow tract is below the aortic valve. It is a disease spectrum that includes multiple diseases ranging from the simple to the complex. This disease has its own characteristics according to different types. The diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies are basically unified, but there are still some disputes about the surgical treatment. Based on the evidence-based data and expert consensus, this paper makes a comprehensive summary and recommendations on the clinical classification, diagnostic criteria and surgical treatment strategies of SAS, which is more suitable for the clinical characteristics of SAS patients in China and more clinically operable.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of different surgical techniques for subaortic stenosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 75 patients with subaortic stenosis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 48 males and 27 females, with a median age of 72 (48, 132) months and mean weight of 21.35±15.82 kg. There were 40 (53.3%) patients combined with aortic regurgitation; 38 (50.7%) patients were the first time and 37 patients were the second time to receive the operation. According to the surgical techniques, 75 patients were divided into two groups: a group A (40 patients with simple subaortic membrane resection) and a group B (35 patients with subaortic membrane and muscle resection or modified Konno procedure).ResultsTwo (2.67%) patients died in hospital. There was one late death in the group B. The average preoperative and postoperative pressure gradient of all patients was 69.96±42.02 mm Hg and 7.44±12.45 mm Hg, respectively. All patients were followed up for 51 (12, 120) months. Pressure gradient at follow-up in the group A and the group B was 8.83±14.52 mm Hg and 5.86±9.53 mm Hg, respectively with no statistical difference (P=0.294). Four patients in the group A and 2 patients in the group B needed reintervention. However, there was no statistical difference in the long-term reintervention rate between the two groups (P=0.480).ConclusionFor the different degree of lesions in the left ventricular outflow tract, our management strategy is feasible. Although there is no statistical difference between two the groups in the long-term reintervention rate after simple valvular membrane resection, prolonged follow-up is necessary to examine the long-term outcomes of different surgical techniques.
Objective To summarize the characteristics of children diagnosed with secondary subaortic stenosis after the surgical closure for ventricular septal defect and explore its potential mechanism. Methods We retrospectively collected patients aged from 0 to 18 years, who underwent ventricular septal defect closure and developed secondary subaortic stenosis, and subsequently received surgical repair from 2008 to 2019 in Fuwai Hospital. Their surgical details, morphological features of the subaortic stenosis, and the follow-up information were analyzed. Results Six patients, including 2 females and 4 males, underwent the primary ventricular septal defect closure at the median age of 9 months (ranging from 1 month to 3 years). After the first surgery, patients were diagnosed with secondary subaortic stenosis after 2.9 years (ranging from 1 to 137 months). Among them, 2 patients underwent the second surgery immediately after diagnosis, and the other 4 patients waited 1.2 years (ranging from 6 to 45 months) for the second surgery. The most common type of the secondary subaortic stenosis after ventricular septal defect closure was discrete membrane, which located underneath the aortic valve and circles as a ring. In some patients, subaortic membrane grew along with the ventricular septal defect closure patch. During the median follow-up of 8.1 years (ranging from 7.3 to 8.9 years) after the sencond surgery, all patients recovered well without any recurrence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Conclusion Regular and persistent follow-up after ventricular septal defect closure combining with or without other cardiac malformation is the best way to diagnose left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in an early stage and stop the progression of aortic valve regurgitation.