Abstract： Objective To summarize our experience and clinical outcomes of preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in mitral valve replacement（MVR）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1 035 patients who underwent MVR in Beijing An Zhen Hospital from January 2006 to March 2011. There were 562 male patients and 473 female patients with their age of 37-78（53.84±13.13）years old. There were 712 patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease and 323 patients with degenerative valve disease, 389 patients with mitral stenosis and 646 patients with mitral regurgitation. No patient had coronary artery disease in this group. For 457 patients in non-preservation group, bothleaflets and corresponding chordal excision was performed, while for 578 patients in preservation group, posterior leafletand subvalvular structures were preserved. There was no statistical difference in demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative mortality and morbidity, and left ventricular size and function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative mortality（2.63% vs. 1.21%, P =0.091）and morbidity （8.53% vs. 7.44%, P=0.519）between the non-preservation group and preservation group, except that the rate of left ventricular rupture of non-preservation group was significantly higher than that of preservation group（1.09% vs. 0.00%, P=0.012）. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension （LVEDD）measured by echocardiography 6 months after surgery decreased in both groups, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6 months after surgery was significantly improved compared with preoperative average LVEF in both groups. The average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation in the preservation group was significantly higher than that in non-preservation group （56.00%±3.47% vs. 53.00%±3.13%，P =0.000）, and there was no statistical difference in the average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral stenosis between the two groups（57.00%±5.58% vs. 56.00%±4.79%，P =0.066）. Conclusion Preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in MVR is a safe and effective surgical technique to reduce the risk of left ventricle rupture and improve postoperative left ventricular function．
Objective To investigate the correlation between the left atrial hydrodynamic change and atrial fibrillation (AF) in the patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Methods According to cardiac rhythm before operation, 49 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis accompanying chronic AF were divided into two groups,group A: AF, 25 cases; group B: sinus rhythm, 24 cases. Control group : 29 healthy volunteers were examined. By using echocardiography, left atrial hydrodynamics were tested, and repeated 6-8 months after the operation. Results Left atrial stress (LAS), left atriala area (LAA) and left atrial volume(LAV) in group A after operation was much lower than before operation, LAS after operation in group B was also lower than before operation(Plt;0.01). Before operation, LAS in group A was significantly lower than that in group B, LAA and LAVwere larger. After operation, LAA and LAV in group A were significantly larger than those in group B(Plt;0.01). LAS, LAA and LAV in group A and group B before and after operation were higher than those in control group. Conclusion Left atrial hydrodynamic enviroment in patients with mitral stenosis has not reached normal even after valve replacement, LAS may be an important factor of causing AF.
【摘要】 目的 探讨西地兰联合小剂量酒石酸美托洛尔静脉注射治疗二尖瓣狭窄合并急性肺水肿与快速型心房颤动的疗效与安全性。 方法 将2005年1月-2010年2月收治的60例二尖瓣狭窄合并急性肺水肿与快速型心房颤动患者，随机分配至西地兰组与联合用药组，西地兰组以多次静脉注射西地兰控制心率，联合用药组则予以多次静脉注射西地兰与小剂量酒石酸美托洛尔，分别在用药开始时、用药开始后监测收缩压、心率、呼吸频率与手指脉搏血氧饱和度（SpO2），同时观察肺部啰音、呼吸困难，记录肺水肿改善时间。 结果 两组患者在治疗开始时心异率、呼吸频率、收缩压与SpO2均无差异；在治疗整个过程中，两组患者收缩压无差异；治疗开始后60、90及120 min时联合用药组心率均显著低于西地兰组。联合用药组从在治疗开始到肺水肿改善的时间短于西地兰组[(71.37±13.37)、(78.77±14.74) min，P=0.046]。治疗期间无患者出现病情恶化或死亡。联合用药组患者的酒石酸美托洛尔平均总量为4.22 mg/例。 结论 在排除美托洛尔禁忌症的前提下，静脉注射西地兰与小剂量酒石酸美托洛尔可快速、安全、有效地控制二尖瓣狭窄合并急性肺水肿与心房颤动患者的心率，缓解肺水肿。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effect of intravenous injection with cedilanid and small does of metoprolol tartrate on mitral stenosis complicating with acute pulmonary edema and atrial fibrillation. Methods Sixty patients with mitral stenosis complicating with acute pulmonary edema and atrial fibrillation from January 2005 to February 2010 were randomly divided into cedilanid group and drug combination group, which was administered with cedilanid, or cedilanid and small does metoprolol tartrate by intravenous injection, respectively. Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), dypnea, rales over lung field and the time from beginning of treatment to pulmonary edema improved were monitored as soon as the treatment began. Results There was no significant difference in basic data such as systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 at the beginning of treatment between the two groups, and no obvious difference was seen in systolic blood pressure at all the time of treatment between the two groups; while a obvious decrease took place in heart rate between cedilanid group and drug combination group after the treatment began; the time from beginning of treatment to pulmonary edema in drug combination group was much shorter than that in cedilanid group [(71.37±13.37), (78.77±14.74) minutes, P=0.046]. Conclusion Without contraindication of metoprolol, intravenous injection with cedilanid combined with small dose of metoprolol can effectively, quickly and safely treat the patients with mitral stenosis complicating with acute pulmonary edema and atrial fibrillation by controlling the heart rate.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the changes of left ventricular morphology and contractile function of patients with mitral stenosis and small left ventricle after mitral valve replacement. MethodsStudies on the changes of left ventricular morphology and contractile function of patients with mitral stenosis and small left ventricle after mitral valve replacement were searched from the databases of Wangfang, VIP, CNKI, PubMed, Elsevier Science Direct, and Cochrane Library from establishment to January 2015. Quality of articles was evaluated. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies to conduct meta-analysis. Mean differences (MD) of left ventricle end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular fraction shortening (LVFS) between the preoperative and the postoperative value from eligible studies were analyzed and pooled, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. R2.15.3 software was applied for statistical analysis. ResultsEight eligible studies involving 446 patients were analyzed in the study. The quality of included literature was high. The results of meta-analysis showed that LVEDVI and LVEDD increased by 14.51 ml/m2 with 95%CI -22.78 to -6.25 (P<0.01) and 4.88 mm with 95%CI -10.85 to 1.09 (P=0.11) respectively at 2 weeks postoperatively compared with preoperative value. LVEF decreased by 3.05% with 95%CI -3.02% to 9.12% (P=0.32) while LVFS increased by 1.16% with 95%CI -4.83% to 2.50% (P=0.53) at 2 weeks postoperatively. Compared with preoperative value, LVEDVI and LVEDD markedly increased by 16.11 ml/m2 with 95%CI -20.32 to -11.90 (P<0.01) and 10.56 mm with 95%CI -11.52 to -9.60 (P<0.01) respectively at 6 months postoperatively. LVEF and LVFS increased by 7.69% with 95%CI -17.18% to 1.8% (P=0.11) and 6.21% with 95%CI -10.07% to -2.36% (P<0.01) respectively at 6 months postoperatively compared with preoperative value. ConclusionLeft ventricular morphology and contractile function of patients with mitral stenosis and small left ventricle recovers well after mitral valve replacement.
ObjectiveTo evaluate myocardial segmental motion function in left ventricular of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by using the technology of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 14 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis between October and November 2014 in our hospital as a trial group. There were 4 males and 10 females with a mean age of 50.9±9.0 years ranging from 34 to 64 years. We chose 11 healthy individuals as a control group. There were 7 males and 4 females with a mean age of 49.5±9.7 years ranging from 32 to 67 years. Both the two groups were subjected to myocardial performance evaluation using two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) to examine the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), longitudinal strain, circumferential strain, area strain, and lateral strain of each left ventricular myocardial segments. Result RT-3DE detected that the trial group had significantly lower values of LVEF, LVEDV and LVESV than those of the control group (P < 0.05). RT-3DE also revealed that the trial group had a significantly weaker longitudinal strain than the control group (P < 0.05). ConclusionRT-3DE is an accurate technology for assessing myocardial motion and function in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.
Objective To evaluate the short-term outcome and influence of atrial fibrillation ablation and mitral valve replacement for patients with mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted for 44 patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation who experienced mitral valve replacement with or without surgical atrial fibrillation ablation procedure in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2017. Eighteen patients experienced mitral valve replacement and surgical atrial fibrillation ablation procedure (a group 1), and the other 26 patients experienced mitral valve replacement without surgical atrial fibrillation ablation procedure (a group 2). In th group 1, there were 4 males and 14 females, aged 43-67 (55.67±7.56) years, and in the group 2 there were 6 males and 20 females, aged 40-72 (54.81±8.81) years. The patients’ data, preoperative echocardiography, surgery procedures, perioperative events, echocardiography and electrocardiogram at postoperative three months were collected to evaluate the short-term outcome and influence of surgical atrial fibrillation ablation procedure for those patients. Results There was no statistical difference in the operation duration (P=0.867) and ICU stay (P=0.550) between the two groups. But the group 1 had longer extracorporeal circulation duration (P=0.006) and aorta arrest duration (P=0.001) than the group 2. No patient died perioperatively and one patient from the group 1 experienced reoperation because of too much chest tube drainage. At three months after operation, echocardiography and electrocardiogram examination showed that 16 patients in the group 1 and 2 patients in the group 2 had sinus rhythm. There was no statistical difference between postoperative and preoperative examination about variation in left ventricle ejection fraction, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, left atrial diameter and left ventricular end diastolic diameter between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion Atrial fibrillation ablation does not increase the risk of mitral valve replacement for patients who have mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation. The rate of converting to sinus rhythm is high, but additional atrial fibrillation ablation procedure does not have positive or negative influence on short-term recovery of cardiac structure and function after operation.