west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "任守阳" 3 results
  • 电视胸腔镜辅助小切口手术与电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的比较分析

    目的 比较电视胸腔镜辅助小切口手术(VAMT)与电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗自发性气胸的临床疗效及成本。 方法 回顾性分析2003年1月至2009年5月四川都江堰市人民医院收治的97例自发性气胸患者的临床资料,其中男69例,女28例;年龄17~72岁,平均年龄34.7岁。均为自发性气胸,术前明确有肺大泡89例,于术中证实有肺大泡8例。首次发生自发性气胸19例(19.6%),第二次发生57例(58.8%),第三次及以上发生21例(21.6%)。根据手术方式不同将97例患者分为两组,VAMT组(n=54):行VAMT治疗; VATS组(n=43):行VATS治疗。 结果 术后两组无手术死亡,两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后胸腔引流时间、并发症发生和住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。失访17例(VAMT组11例、VATS组6例),随访80例(VAMT组43例、VATS组37例),随访时间3个月~2年。VAMT组自发性气胸复发2例,VATS组复发1例;两组自发性气胸复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。VATS组术中使用一次性耗材(8 045.6元 vs. 738.2元,P=0.002)和总医疗费用(16 977.8元 vs. 10 005.8元,P=0.047)高于VAMT组。 结论 采用VAMT治疗自发性气胸患者的医疗费用明显低于VATS,而临床效果差异无统计学意义。

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Prevention and Management of Respiratory Failure after Surgery for Esophageal Cancer

    ObjectiveTo analyze the main causes and management of respiratory failure after surgery for esophageal cancer. MethodsWe retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of 27 patients with respiratory failure after surgery for esophageal cancer in our hospital between January 2005 and December 2012. ResultsOf the 27 patients with respiratory failure after surgery for esophageal cancer, 23 were at advanced age, and 15 had moderately to severely impaired pulmonary function before surgery. After surgery, 19 suffered severe pulmonary infection, 8 yielded complications such as anastomotic leak, gastropleural fistula chylothorax, and postoperative bleeding. ConclusionPulmonary infections and surgical complications are the major and direct causes of respiratory failure after surgery for esophageal cancer. For high-risk patients at advanced age with impaired pulmonary function, enhancing perioperative airway management and improving surgical operation can decrease incidence of respiratory failure effectively.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison between Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Surgery for Multiple Rib Fractures

    ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and conventional surgery for the treatment of multiple rib fractures. MethodsA total of 173 consecutive patients with multiple rib fractures were admitted to Dujiangyan People's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. There were 122 males and 51 females with their age of 19-71 (41.3±7.1) years. According to different treatment strategies, all the patients were divided into 3 groups:conservative treatment group (83 patients with a mean of 4.9±1.3 fractured ribs, including 20 patients with flail chest), conventional surgery group (41 patients with a mean of 5.2±1.1 fractured ribs, including 11 patients with flail chest) and VATS group (49 patients with a mean of 5.3±1.5 fractured ribs, including 14 patients with flail chest). Length of hospital stay, duration of postoperative pain, incision length, operation time, chest drainage duration and morbidity were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsThe incision length (5.2±1.5 cm vs. 8.5±2.3 cm, P=0.031), operation time (1.1±0.3 hours vs. 1.8±0.2 hours, P=0.003), chest drainage duration (0.3±0.0 day vs. 3.2±1.1 days, P=0.007) and length of hospital stay (13.7±1.5 days vs. 17.3±2.3 days, P=0.017) of VATS group were significantly shorter than those of the conventional surgery group. A total of 159 patients were followed up, and chest x-ray was examined at 1, 3 and 6 months after discharge. After 3 months, bone callus formation was evident around the rib fractures in chest x-ray in patients undergoing surgery, while bone union with deformity was shown in some patients of the conservative group. ConclusionWith the development of various internal fixation materials, surgical internal fixation has become a trend for patients with multiple rib fractures, and VATS internal fixation is minimally invasive with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content