目的 探讨3种不同助孕方案在≥40岁妇女体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）周期中的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2010年8月－2012年2月期间，于四川大学华西第二医院生殖中心行IVF-ET助孕、年龄≥40岁妇女共245个周期的临床资料，排除一侧卵巢缺如患者3例，余242个周期根据助孕方案不同分为3组：拮抗剂组（GnRH-A方案组）44个周期、长方案组109个周期及短方案组89个周期，比较3种方式助孕的临床效果。 结果 3组均无早发黄体生成素峰；长方案组应用促性腺激素（Gn）的时间最长，应用Gn数量最多，获得最高的获卵数及获胚数（P＜0.05）；3组的受精率、优胚率、冷冻胚胎数、周期取消率、卵巢过度刺激综合征发生率、早期流产率均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），短方案组的种植率及临床妊娠率最低（P＜0.05）。 结论 GnRH-a长方案在≥40岁妇女的IVF-ET周期中具有较好的临床结局，在≥40岁妇女IVF-ET周期中具有与长方案相似的结局，并且可以减少Gn使用量，提高卵泡及胚胎质量，短方案组对≥40岁妇女临床效果较差。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of different pituitary down regulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment. MethodsThe clinical data of 358 IVF cycles in women at 40 years old or younger from November 2012 to January 2013 in the West China Second University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All the 358 cycles were divided into two groups, according to whether the leading follicle diameter was <14 mm (group A, 158 cycles) or ≥14 mm (group B, 200 cycles) after discontinuing the GnRH-a. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompared with group B, the amount of gonadotropins used was significantly more, and the time of gonadotropin use was also significantly longer in group A (P<0.05). However, the serum level of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and Luteinizing hormone (LH), incidence of premature P rise, retrieved ovum number, the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth did not significantly differ between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionDiscontinuing the use of GnRH-a in early stage of controlled ovarian stimulation can keep effective pituitary down regulation and it has the same optimal clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVF-ET.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopy with postoperative gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) versus laparoscopy alone for endometriosis. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) on laparoscopy with postopertative GnRH-a versus laparoscopy alone in treatment of endometriosis were retrieved in the following databases:the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data, CNKI, and CBM from inception to February, 2013. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature were screened, the data was extracted and the methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed by two reviewers independently. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.7 software. ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 761 patients were included. There were statistically significant differences between the laparoscopy with postoperative GnRH-a group and the laparoscopy alone group in the following 4 aspects:the symptom relief rate (RR=1.24, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.33, P < 0.000 01), the recurrence of lesion (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.51, P < 0.000 01), the recurrence of pain (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.92, P=0.01), and the pregnancy rate (RR=1.43, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.65, P < 0.000 01). ConclusionLaparoscopy postoperative GnRH-a for endometriosis can enhance the symptom relief rate, reduce the recurrence of lesion and the recurrence of pain, and increase the pregnancy rate. But because of the limitation of the quality of the included studies and publication bias, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more high quality RCTs.
Objective To summarize the progress of effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on protecting ovarian function of young breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy, and to provide reference for clinical work. Methods Through searching of PubMed, CNKI, WanFang database, and other databases, we mainly collected relevant literatures in nearly five years, which concerning the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on protecting the ovarian function of young breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy. Results Young breast cancer patients faced with problems about long-term survival, quality of life, social psychological pressure, and other related problems. Chemotherapy caused irreversible damage to the ovarian function. Chemotherapy combind with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could prevent premature ovarian failure and improve patients’ quality of life. Conclusions Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combines with chemotherapy can protect the ovarian function of young breast cancer patients, and reduce premature ovarian failure and retain reproductive function with no serious adverse effect. In addition, it shall not affect the curative effect of chemotherapy itself, but this conclusion still needs further randomized controlled clinical trial to confirm.
ObjectivesTo evaluate and compare the clinical impact of different methods of trigger in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with high ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.MethodsA total of 323 PCOS patients with high ovarian response in an gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in our reproductive medical center from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2017 were included. Then they were divided into two groups based on the different trigger modes: Group A: gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) with low dose human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG); Group B: HCG as trigger. Analysis and comparison of the general data of the two groups of patients, ovulation induction cycle treatment, embryo laboratory indicators and resuscitation cycle treatment outcome were performed retrospectively.ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline such as ages, BMI, startup dose of Gn, the total dosage of drugs, promote ovulation days and so on (P>0.05). The serum E2 level on trigger day in group A was significantly higher than those in group B (7 256.94±2 031.92 vs. 6 200.26±1 001.44, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the retrieved oocytes (23.90±7.99 vs. 23.81±7.15), binuclear fertilization rate (58.19% vs. 56.30%), and the number of frozen embryos (12.81±5.45 vs. 11.07±5.36) between two groups (P>0.05). There were also no significant differences between two groups in the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS (5.98% vs. 7.87%), clinical pregnancy rate (59.28% vs. 57.53%), implantation rate (41.05% vs. 38.24%), miscarriage rate (9.28% vs. 8.22%) and live birth rate (47.42% vs. 41.10%) during the frozen-thawed cycles (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor high responders of PCOS patients with GnRH antagonist protocol, using GnRH-a with low dose HCG as trigger maybe could decrease the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. Embryo resuscitation and transfer cycle can also obtain ideal outcome.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3-month sustained releasing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (GnRHa 3M) and 1-month sustained releasing GnRHa (GnRHa 1M) in the treatment of pre-menopausal females with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods Databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and Web of Science were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of GnRHa in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from inception to May 18th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The gemtc software package in R 3.6.1 software and Stata 15.0 software were used for network meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 RCTs including 7 484 patients were included. The network meta-analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between GnRHa 3M and GnRHa 1M in E2 level (MD=−1.3, 95%CI −13 to 9.6), DFS (HR=1.2, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.7) and OS (HR=2.0, 95%CI 0.75 to 4.9). For safety, there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR=1.0, 95%CI 0.25 to 4.2). Conclusion Current evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of GnRHa 3M is similar to that of GnRHa 1M. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.