目的 探讨保留括约肌虚挂线法治疗高位肛周脓肿的临床疗效。 方法 2009年10月－2010年10月采用随机对照试验，对52例高位肛周脓肿患者施行手术治疗，其中保留括约肌虚挂线法（治疗组）26例，切开挂线引流法（对照组）26例。对两组患者术后6个月肛瘘发生率、切口愈合时间、术后1～15 d每晚疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和术后6个月痊愈患者肛门功能后遗症发生率进行比较。 结果 术后6个月，治疗组和对照组肛瘘发生率分别为4.0%和3.8%，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后7～15 d治疗组VAS评分均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组切口愈合时间分别为（19.05 ± 6.71）d和（21.42 ± 8.40）d，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后6个月治疗组痊愈患者肛门功能全部正常，对照组后遗症发生率为12.0%，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 保留括约肌虚挂线治疗在术后疼痛、切口愈合时间和保护肛门功能等方面明显优于切开挂线引流治疗，是一种治疗高位肛周脓肿较为理想的方法。
ObjectiveTo compare clinical efficacy of 4 kinds of surgical treatment for high transsphincter fistula. MethodsThe clinical data of 116 patients with high transsphincter fistula in Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM from January 2012 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.These patients were divided into 4 groups according to surgical treatments,including cut seton group (n=30),loose seton group (n=34),ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract group (LIFT,n=41),mucosa advancement flap group (MAF,n=11).The length of stay,incision healing time,postoperative pain score on the second day,Wexner score when healed,postoperative complications,curative status,and recurrence were observed. Results① The length of stay in the loose seton group was significantly longer than that in the LIFT group (P<0.01),cut seton group (P<0.05) or MAF group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).② The incision healing time in the loose seton group was significantly longer than that in the LIFT group (P<0.01) or the MAF group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).③ The postoperative pain score on the second day in the cut seton group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.01),which in the MAF group was lower than that in the LIFT group (P<0.05),but which had no difference between the other groups (P>0.05).④The Wexner score when healed in the cut seton group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.01),bwt which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).⑤ The rate of postoperative complica-tion in the LIFT group was significantly higher than that in the loose seton group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).⑥ The curative rate and recurrence rate had no statistically differences among the 4 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsCurative rate and recurrence rate in loose seton,LIFT,and MAF group are similar with cut seton group,meanwhile they could protect anal function better and relieve pain.The length of stay and the incision healing time are longer in the loose seton group.The postoperative complications in LIFT group is increased as compared with loose seton group.The postoperative pain of MAF group is slighter than that in LIFT group.Comprehensive evaluation,MAF has more advantages,but the technique is more complex.The decision should be made individually according to patients and surgeons.
Objective To trace and review the treatment of complex anal fistula so as to consider whether current procedures and therapies might offer a better choice. Methods Through the literature collected, with the difficulties and contradictions of the treatment of complex anal fistula as the starting point, the currently widely used seton management, the development and deficiency of biological therapy and sphincter preserving surgery, and the change of treatment model of complex anal fistula were reviewed. The research progress and application prospect of intersphincteric fistula ligation was focus attented. Results The treatment of complex anal fistula would be not too much emphasis of healing or radical cure, and more attention to the anus function, shape, fine feeling, and quality of life, has become a consensus. The seton management remained an useful therapy for the treatment of complicated anal fistula through continuous improvement and development, in despite of it has postoperative relapse or mild to moderate anal incontinence. Biotherapy relied on its minimal invasion rising in recent years especially at abroad, but it is limited wider application in China because of its high cost, unstable efficacy, and high recurrence rate. Sphincter-preserving operation always attracts attentions particularly under the background of invasive treatment. It has been already established about efficacy and security of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract as a novel procedure, which possessed an excellent advantage for protecting anal continence. Conclusion The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is a promising procedure, which tends to be superior than fistulotomy and seton management, may become a first-line treatment of complex anal fistula.