west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "保胆取石术" 3 results
  • A Clinical Study on Tauro Ursodeoxycholic Acid for the Relapse of Cholelithiasis after Gallbladder-Protected Lithotomy

    Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of the tauro ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) for preventing the relapse of lithiasis after the gallbladder-protected lithotomy. Methods Totally 80 cholecyslithiasis patients in Chengdu General Military Hospital who met the demand of lithotomy in protecting gallbladder were divided into two groups by random permutations, with 40 patients in each. The calculus was removed by using the percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy in order to preserve the well-functioning gallbladder. The patients in the trial group were given TUDCA after surgery for two years, whereas the patients in the control group received the same nursing and diet therapies without medication. The thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder were checked two years after surgery, the statistics of the recurrence rate of liary calculus symptoms and cholecyslithiasis were conducted, and the comparison between those two groups was performed. Results All the operations of gallbladder-protected lithotomy were successful. There was significant difference between those two groups two years after surgery in terms of the thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder (Plt;0.05). The relapse of lithiasis was remarkably decreased in the trial group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The application of TUDCA for patients with gallbladder-protected lithotomy can prevent the relapse of cholecyslithiasis.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:06 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative Analysis Between Laparoscopic Microinvasion Gallbladder-Preserving Lithotomy and Laparoscopic Cholecystolithotomy

    目的 探讨腹腔镜下联合胆道镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的疗效。方法 解放军第452医院普外科2005年1月至2010年1月期间行腹腔镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石患者70例,与同期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者对比,观察2组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后饮食恢复时间。结果 在术中出血量及术后饮食恢复时间上,保胆取石组明显少于或短于胆囊切除组(P<0.05);在手术时间、术后住院时间及住院费用上2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 相比胆囊切除术,腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术创伤较小且恢复较快,但是保胆取石术后结石的复发有待长期观察和研究。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 小切口与腹腔镜保胆取石术治胆囊结石的效果观察

    目的比较小切口保胆取石术与腹腔镜保胆取石术在治疗胆囊结石中的疗效。 方法选取2007年8月-2012年6月收治的胆囊结石患者140例,分为研究组(n=80,采取小切口保胆取石术)及对照组(n=60,采取腹腔镜保胆取石术),对比分析两组的临床疗效。 结果手术时间、出血量、肠道恢复时间、住院时间、中转开腹率、结石残留率、结石复发率、术后并发症、镇痛药使用等方面,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组与对照组平均住院费用分别为(5 014.8±670.4)、(7 852.5±954.6)元,研究组明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-20.659,P<0.001)。 结论小切口保胆取石术与腹腔镜保胆取石术都是微创、安全、疗效确切的保胆取石手术方式,应根据患者的实际情况选择合适的手术方式。小切口保胆取石术的优点在于无需价值高昂的设备、术者不需要专门培训、适应证广、住院费用相对较低、简单易学,更值得在基层医院推广。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content