【摘要】 目的 探讨健康教育路径在下腔静脉滤器（inferior vena cava filter，VCF）置入术患者中的应用效果。 方法 2008年1月－2010年5月，将62例VCF置入术患者随机分为观察组（32例）和对照组（30例），观察组采用健康教育路径进行健康教育，对照组患者采用常规健康教育。 结果 观察组患者的健康教育达标率明显高于对照组（Plt;0.05），焦虑发生率明显低于对照组。 结论 应用健康教育路径对VCF置入术患者实施，能提高患者对健康知识的掌握程度和效果，促进患者早日康复；同时可强化护患沟通，和谐护患关系。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of health education pathway in patients treated with placement of inferior vena cava filter (VCF). Methods Sixty-two patients treated with placement of inferior VCF from January 2008 to May 2010 were randomly divided into experimental group (n=32) and control group (n=30). Health education pathway and routine general way were adopted respectively to treat patients in the experimental group and the control group. Results Standard-achieving rate of the health education in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (Plt;0.05), and the incidence of anxiety was also lower in the experimental group. Conclusion Health education pathway for patients treated with placement of inferior VCF can increase the patients’ health care knowledge, lessen patients’ anxiety, and strengthen the nurse-patient communication and harmonious relations.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of health education pathway intervention on self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in colostomy patients. MethodsEighty-eight rectal cancer patients who had undergone colostomy were randomly divided into control group and intervention group (with 44 patients in each) between March 2012 and September 2013. The control group received conventional nursing only, while the intervention group were given health education pathway intervention besides conventional nursing. The self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the two groups under pre-colostomy state, one week after colostomy and two weeks after colostomy were surveyed and compared based on the exercise of self-care agency scale and the health promotion lifestyle profile. ResultsAfter health education pathway intervention, the scores of self-care agency and health lifestyle promotion in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the hospitalization expenditure was also obviously lower. Furthermore, the satisfaction degree on nursing service was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe health education pathway intervention can greatly improve self-care agency and quality of life in rectal cancer patients who have undergone colostomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of health education pathway intervention on the mental status and coping capacity in family members of brain injury patients receiving surgery. MethodsOne hundred and eighty-eight family members were randomly divided into control group (n=93) and intervention group (n=95) between September 2013 and October 2014. The control group received conventional health education only, while the intervention group was given health education pathway intervention. The mental status and coping capacity of family members in the two groups on admission and at discharge were surveyed and compared based on symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90) and coping styles questionnaire (CSQ). The hospitalization stay and expenditure and the satisfaction degree were also compared. ResultsThere was no significant differences in mental status and coping capacity in family members between the two groups on admission (P > 0.05). After health education pathway intervention, the positive rate of SCL-90 in the control group was significantly higher than that in the intervention group, and the total score and score for each factor were also obviously higher (P < 0.05). As for coping capacity, the scores of self-blaming, avoidance, fancy and rationalization of CSQ in the control group were significantly higher than those in the intervention group, and the scores of appealing help and resolving problems were obviously lower (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the hospitalization stay and expenditure were significantly shorter or lower in the intervention group than those in the control group, and the satisfaction degree on nursing service was obviously higher (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe health education pathway intervention can greatly improve mental status and coping capacity in family members of brain injury patients.