Objective To compare the 2009 edition national essential medicine list (part of basic medicine and heath institution ) in China and WHO model list of essential medicines for children update in 2010, so as to provide the evidence for model list of essential medicines for children of China. Methods We compared the diference in composition of content, the categories, speciic drugs, formulation, and introduction and sign of list by descriptive analysis. Results (1) WHO model list of essential medicines for children were comprised with core and complimentary lists, which were not in the 2009 edition national essential medicine list of China; (2) The 2009 edition essential medicine lists of China included 20 categories in WHO model list of essential medicines for children ,while lacked of antineoplastic agents, blood products, disinfectants, peritoneal dialysis luid and speciic medicines for neonatal care; (3) he average conincidence rate with WHO model list of essential medicines for children of the same drugs was 52.61%. here were 15 categories in the interval of 20%-80%, which accounted for 75%. he average conincidence rate with 2009 edition national essential medicine list of China was 44.19%. here were 11 categories in the interval of 20%-50%,which accounted for 55%. the same drugs of regulate water, electrolyte and acid-base balance in the two list accounted for more than 80% of WHO model list of essential medicines for children. Drugs of ear, nose and throat were totally diferent. (4) he 2009 edition essential medicine list of China didn’t have speciication and sign of drug for children, age limitation, instruction of list, suitable drug formulations for children such as suspension, syrup, drops, granules, scored tablets, etc. Conclusion 2009 edition national essential medicine list of China can’t meet the demand of children. WHO model list of essential medicines for children which bases on global burden of disease, can not be copied into China. We suggest to reference fromWHO model list of essential medicines for children to carry out selecting essential medicines for children in China, formulating essential medicine list for children in China which bases on burden of children disease and clinical demand in China to improve rationality of drugs in children.
ObjectiveComparing the worldwide Essential Medicines Lists for Children (EMLcs) and National Essential Medicine List (NEML) of China (2012 edition), to provide evidence for establishing EMLc of China. MethodWe searched the official websites of WHO and Ministry of Health of some countries to identify published EMLcs. We compared the situation of updating, the number and classification of medicines, and the dosage forms between these EMLcs and NEML of China (2012). ResultBy August 2013, the WHO, India and South Africa had established EMLc. The number of medicines of NEML of China (2012) ranked first in the four lists. The WHO, India and China classified the medicines by pharmacologic action, while South Africa classified it by anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification. Except the WHO, India, South Africa and China did not have specific medicines for neonatal care or medicines for diseases of joints. The main administration routes in these four lists were oral administration, injection, and topical application. There were medicine restrictions in EMLcs of WHO and India, while no medicine restrictions in lists of South Africa and China. ConclusionMedicines listed in NEML of China (2012) do not match children's disease burden of China. The applicable dosage forms for children are few and the medicine restrictions are absent for the list. So this list is not suitable for Children.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the developing methodologies of Essential Medicines Lists for Children (EMLcs) in global, in order to provide reference in developing EMLc of China. MethodsWe searched ProQuest, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink and MEDLINE databases, World Health Organization (WHO) official website, and 67 websites of National Ministry of Health and Drug Administration Section, to collect literature about selection methodology of children and/or adult essential medicines list (EML). A descriptive analysis was conducted. ResultsA total of fourteen literatures were included. Of which, 6 were about the essential medicines selection methodology in children, and the other 8 were about the essential medicines selection methodology in adult. The WHO had established independent EMLc selection committee. Paediatricians were involved in the selection of EMLc in the WHO and India. There was no selection criteria and process for EMLc globally. The WHO, India, and South Africa selected their EMLcs referring to the WHO EML selection criteria. The WHO and South Africa had their own updating time, period and process for EMLc. The WHO EMLc was updated per 2 years, which in high frequency and conducts in rigorous process. However, the EMLc of India had not been updated yet. ConclusionIt is suggested that China could build a national EMLc selection committee involving paediatricians and evidence-based medicine experts etc. in referring to the framework of the WHO Child Health Working Group. The EMLc selection criteria and process of China could be established referring to the one of the WHO, based on the disease burden, drug accessibility and medical insurance of children of China. The EMLc of China should be simultaneously updated with the adult EML of China.
Objective To systematically review the diseases constitution of children in Chinese medical institutions from 2010 to 2016, and to provide evidence for establishing essential medicine list for children (EMLc) of China. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from January 2010 to February 2016 to collect studies about diseases constitution of Chinese children. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of included studies, then data was descriptively analyzed. Results A total of 33 studies of diseases constitution were included, involving 1 797 696 children among 0 to 18 years from 17 provinces of China. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal pneumonia and premature were the main diseases of inpatient newborns. The main diseases of children hospitalized were pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection and tumor. Upper respiratory tract infection, bronchopneumonia, bronchitis and diarrhea were the main diseases of outpatients. Hyperspasmia, upper respiratory tract infection and pneumonia were the main diseases of emergency patients. Diseases constitution of different medical institution: the main diseases were pathological jaundice, neonatal asphyxia and neonatal pneumonia in both tertiary and secondary medical institution in the newborn group. In the children group, the main diseases were pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection and bronchitis in both tertiary and secondary medical institution. Besides these diseases, indigestion and fever of unknown origin were also the main diseases of primary medical institution. Disease constitution of different areas: in the newborn group, pathological jaundice, neonatal pneumonia and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were the main diseases in coastal areas. Neonatal pneumonia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and premature were the main diseases in inland areas. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal pneumonia and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy were the main diseases in remote areas. In children group, pneumonia, bronchitis and premature were the main diseases in coastal areas. Pneumonia, bronchitis and hand-foot-and-mouth disease were the main diseases in inland areas. Upper respiratory tract infection, bronchopneumonia and bronchitis were the main diseases in remote areas. Conclusion Diseases constitutions of children vary in different medical institution, and because of extreme lack of date from primary medical institution, we suggest to carry out investigation in primary medical institution to provide evidence for EMLc. Diseases constitutions of children vary in different area, additions should be made according to local conditions when essential drugs of children selected. Newborn, as a special group of children, should be considered separately when EMLc of China established.