Objective To compare the biomechanical stability of Kirschner wire and tension band wiring, reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring, and olecranon anatomical plate in fixing proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture, so as to provide the theoretical evidence for clinical selection of internal fixation. Methods Eight specimens of elbow joints and ligaments were taken from eight fresh male adult cadaveric elbows (aged 26-43 years, mean 34.8 years) donated voluntarily. The model of proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture was made by an osteotomy in each specimen. Fracture end was fixed successively by Kirschner wire and tension band wiring (group A), reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring (group B), and olecranon anatomical plate (group C), respectively. The biomechanical test was performed for monopodium compression experiments, and load-displacement curves were obtained. The stability of the fixation was evaluated according to the load value when the compression displacement of fracture segment was 2 mm. Results No Kirschner wire withdrawal, broken plate and screw, loosening and specimens destruction were observed. The load-displacement curves of 3 groups showed that the displacement increased gradually with increasing load, while the curve slope of groups B and C was significantly higher than that of group A. When the compression displacement was 2 mm, the load values of groups A, B, and C were (218.6 ± 66.9), (560.3 ± 116.1), and (577.2 ± 137.6) N, respectively; the load values of groups B and C were significantly higher than that of group A (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between groups B and C (t=0.305, P=0.763). Conclusion The proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture is unstable. Reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring and olecranon anatomical plate can meet the requirement of fracture fixation, so they are favorable options for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture. Kirschner wire and tension band wiring is not a stable fixation, therefore, it should not be only used for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture.
目的 比较克氏针张力带与锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。 方法 1999年1月－2007年3月，收治肩锁关节脱位患者29例，分别采用克氏针张力带联合喙锁韧带重建（克氏针组10例）和锁骨钩钢板（钢板组19例）治疗。其中男18例，女11例；年龄19～50岁，平均38.2岁。患者均为新鲜RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位，受伤至手术时间1～16 d，平均3 d。两组患者性别、年龄、受伤至手术时间等一般资料比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。进行两组患者术后临床及影像学评估比较。 结果 25例患者（克氏针组10例，钢板组15例）获随访，随访时间2～12年，平均6年。术后克氏针组发生克氏针弯曲5例、断裂1例；钢板组切口浅表感染2例，经换药后治愈，其余患者切口Ⅰ期愈合。两组患者肩锁关节均获得良好功能，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。影像学方面：与克氏针组相比，在患肢负重位时钢板组喙锁间隙间距增加了23%（P＜0.05），非负重位两组间距差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后8～12周出现喙锁韧带钙化，钢板组12例、克氏针组2例（P＜0.05）。术后6个月出现肩锁关节骨性关节炎，钢板组2例、克氏针组1例（P＞0.05）。肩关节功能与影像学结果无相关性（r=0.096，P＞0.05）。 结论 克氏针张力带联合喙锁韧带重建和锁骨钩钢板固定治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位均可获得良好的临床功能。与克氏针张力带相比，锁骨钩钢板固定具有手术操作简便、疗效确切、并发症少、能够早期康复锻炼等优点。
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of improved and traditional Kirschner wire tension band fixation in treatment of type C patellar fractures.MethodsBetween January 2017 and January 2019, 26 patients with type C patellar fractures were treated with improved Kirschner wire tension band fixation (group A), and 24 patients were treated with traditional Kirschner wire tension band fixation (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and side and type of fracture between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 and 3 days after operation, the fracture healing time, and the occurrence of complications (skin irritation of Kirschner wires, failure of internal fixation, fracture reduction loss) were recorded, and the knee function was evaluated by Lysholm scoring standard in 2 groups.ResultsThe operation time in group A was significantly less than that in group B (t=−4.742, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss and VAS scores at 1 and 3 days after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 8-15 months, with an average of 11 months. The fracture healing time was (3.3±0.6) months in group A and (3.2±0.6) months in group B, showing no significant difference (t=0.589, P=0.559). At last follow-up, the knee joint function was evaluated according to Lysholm scoring standard. And there were 15 cases of excellent, 8 cases of good, and 3 cases of fair, with an excellent and good rate of 88.5% in group A; there were 8 cases of excellent, 7 cases of good, 7 cases of fair, and 2 cases of poor, with an excellent and good rate was 62.5%. The difference between 2 groups was significant (Z=2.828, P=0.005). The internal fixators were removed after the fracture healed in 2 groups. At last follow-up, no skin irritation of Kirschner wires occurred in group A, but 3 cases in group B. X-ray films reexamination showed that 5 cases of internal fixation failure and no fracture reduction loss were found in group A, while 9 cases of internal fixation failure and 1 case of fracture reduction loss in group B. The incidence of complications in group A was 19.2% (5/26), which was significantly lower than that in group B (54.2%, 13/24) (χ2=6.611, P=0.010).ConclusionCompared with the traditional Kirschner wire tension band fixation, the improved Kirschner wire tension band fixation in treatment of type C patellar fracture can shorten the operation time, reduce the incidence of complications, and benefit the functional recovery of knee joint.