目的 评估多普勒超声引导的痔上动脉结扎治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ度内痔的临床应用价值。方法 对2009 年4～9月期间在我科行多普勒超声引导的痔上动脉结扎的49 例Ⅱ、Ⅲ度内痔患者从术后肛门括约肌功能、症状有效改善情况、疼痛程度及完全恢复正常生活所需时间方面进行评价。结果 术后无患者出现肛门括约肌功能失调；术后1 周、1 个月及3 个月Ⅱ、Ⅲ度内痔分别有77.8%(42/54)、87.0%(47/54)、92.6%(50/54)和59.4%(19/32)、71.9%(23/32)、78.1%(25/32)的患者单项症状得到有效改善； 术后6 h及24 h VAS 法疼痛程度评分平均分分别为1.95分和1.63分； 患者完全恢复正常生活所需时间平均为术后2.98 d。结论 多普勒超声引导的痔上动脉结扎治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ度内痔安全有效，术后疼痛较轻且可以较快地完全恢复正常生活。
目的 探讨在局部麻醉下行痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids，PPH）治疗重度内痔的可行性及临床应用价值。方法 笔者所在医院科室从2005年起对32例Ⅲ度及Ⅳ度脱垂性内痔（含1例混合痔）患者均采用苯巴比妥＋氢溴酸东莨菪碱＋利多卡因肛管直肠环形局部浸润麻醉行PPH术，对其麻醉效果、手术时间、术中及术后疼痛、尿潴留、术后感染、肛门狭窄、住院时间、治疗满意度等进行分析。结果 32例患者均顺利完成手术，有1例术中改行低位连续硬膜外麻醉，1例辅加镇静剂及镇痛剂。术后28例对疼痛能耐受，4例需镇痛药物；1例患者有肛门坠胀感；所有患者伤口均一期愈合，无尿潴留、术后感染、出血、肛门狭窄等并发症发生；31例对疗效满意，有1例感肛门坠胀，行温水坐浴及痔疮膏纳肛治疗1周后缓解。住院时间3～6d，平均4d。32例患者均进行有效随访，随访时间2～4个月，平均3个月，无大便失禁或复发，肛门控便能力均可。结论 局部麻醉下行PPH术治疗重度内痔是一种安全可行的手术方法，麻醉操作护理简单，疗效确切，术后并发症少，术后恢复快，并可减少医疗费用。
目的 探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术（PPH）的操作技巧、临床疗效及并发症。方法 根据患者具体情况，采用PPH术个性化治疗重度痔病患者128例，分析其手术操作技巧与临床疗效及术中、术后并发症的关系。结果 手术持续时间平均为30min，切除组织宽度平均为3.5cm。术中出血58例，其中渗血42例，搏动性出血16例。术后出血5例，吻合口感染1例；无大便失禁、吻合口狭窄。术后6个月随访，106例外脱痔块完全回缩，7例回缩不全，15例失访。结论 PPH术已被初步证明是一种微创、安全、有效的手术，但尚需进一步的经验积累及大规模临床试验加以验证。
目的 探讨痔的病因及其分类，总结痔的诊治经验。方法 回顾性分析2005年7月至2008年9月期间在我院诊治的53例痔患者的临床资料。结果 18例Ⅱ度内痔中11例给予一般治疗，有7例便后仍有痔块脱出; 7例注射治疗均无便后痔块脱出。14例外痔均治愈，其中5例血栓性外痔均行血栓剥离术; 6例单纯结缔组织外痔中4例给予一般治疗，2例手术切除皮赘，瘙痒、潮湿症状改善; 3例单纯炎性外痔给予口服抗生素及一般治疗，疼痛症状缓解。21例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔或混合痔术后均无痔块随排便脱出，其中16例（76.2%）发生肛门水肿，15例（71.4%）肛门疼痛短期临时应用止痛剂后缓解，共有15例（71.4%）患者获得随访，随访1～3年（平均2年），无复发，无肛门狭窄，无控便及精细控便障碍。结论 内、外痔各有其相应的病因及发病机理。应放弃用一种学说或发病机理解释所有“痔”的思维。MilliganMorgan术仍是基层医院治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔或混合痔较理想术式，但疼痛和水肿是其不足。
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progression of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation in the treatment of hemorrhoids. MethodsThe related literatures in recent years were reviewed, and to investigate the operation principle, operation process, the indications and effects, and existing problems of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. ResultsThe surgical principle of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation make use of Doppler ultrasound looking for hemorrhoidal artery, and ligation it directly.It's best indication is Ⅱ or Ⅲ degree hemorrhoids or mixed hemorrhoid with grade Ⅰ or Ⅲ mainly, especially for bleeding hemorrhoids disease curative effect is better.This surgical method has lots of advantages, such as less invasive, quick recovery, and low incidence of complications.But it is no significant treatment effect for the external hemorrhoids, therefore, the procedure does not apply to external hemo-rrhoids and mixed hemorrhoids dominated by external hemorrhoids. ConclusionsDoppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation has the advantage of minimally invasive, it is a safe and effective treatment for Ⅱ and Ⅲ degree internal hemorr-hoids or Ⅱ and Ⅲ degree mixed hemorrhoids dominated by internal hemorrhoids.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of automatic ligation of hemorrhoids (ALH) and procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids. MethodsOne hundred and eighty elderly patients with hemorrhoids who were admitted into the First People's Hospital of Jining City from January 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. According to the operative mode, the patients were divided into ALH group and PPH group, with 90 cases in each group, received ALH and PPH treatment respectively. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, edema, bleeding, infection, anal swelling and anal stenosis were observed in the two groups, and two methods of operation were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, healing time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications. ResultsThe VAS scores of the ALH group in the day 1-3 after operation were lower than that of the PPH group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the frequency of the use of analgesics in ALH group was less than that in PPH group (P < 0.01); the amount of blood loss and the healing time of the ALH group were significantly less or shoter than those of the PPH group (P < 0.01); the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the ALH group was 2.22% (2/90), which was significantly lower than that of the PPH group, 27.78% (25/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=23.050, P=0.000); the incidence of perianal edema after operation in the ALH group was 5.56% (5/90), which was significantly lower than that of PPH group of 15.56% (14/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.766, P=0.029). There was no obvious postoperative bleeding in the ALH group(0/90), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the PPH group was 7.78% (7/90), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P=0.007). The efficiency of ALH group was 98.89% (89/90) and the PPH group was 97.78% (88/90), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.339, P=0.560). Conciusions There is no significant difference between ALH and PPH in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids, but ALH has the advantages of less pain, quicker recovery and fewer complications, it is worthy of popularization and application.