Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) in the treatment of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA). Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2012), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to September 2012 for randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness and safety of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) for ULMCA; References of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0. Results Four studies were included involving 1 611 cases, of which, 802 cases are in the CABG group, while 809 cases were in the PCI group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: comparing with PCI, CABG significantly reduced the postoperative repeat revascularization rate (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.66, Plt;0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in reducing the myocardial infarction incidence (OR=1.28, 95%CI 0.47 to 3.48, P=0.63), mortality rate (OR=1.36, 95%CI 0.80 to 2.34, P=0.26), and the incidence of major adverse cardio-cerebral vascular events (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.28, P=0.61). Conclusion This study indicates that CABG is superior to PCI in reducing postoperative rate of target vessel revascularization. But CABG and PCI are alike in reducing myocardial infarction incidence, mortality rate, and the incidence of major adverse cardio-cerebral vascular events. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by more high quality RCTs.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors related to recurrent coronary events in patients after coronary artery stent implantation. MethodsWe retrospectively studied the patients performing coronary angiography (CAG) who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between January 2012 and June 2013. All of the enrolled patients had received CAG in our hospital, with complete coronary angiogram and clinical data. The patients were divided into two groups according to the coronary angiogram and clinical data: coronary event group and non-coronary event group. SPSS 16.0 software was employed for statistical analysis, and multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression model to analyze the risk factors. ResultsA total of 115 patients were included, of which 50 patients had recurrent coronary events. Both the serum total bilirubin and unconjugated bilirubin in patients with coronary events were significantly lower compared with the patients without coronary events at baseline and at the time of CAG reexamination (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The serum total bilirubin at baseline and the serum total bilirubin and unconjugated bilirubin at the time of CAG reexamination were significantly lower in patients with revasculization due to the progression of coronary artery lesions compared with the patients without coronary events (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The serum unconjugated bilirubin in patients with in-stent restenosis were significantly lower compared with the patients without coronary events at baseline and at the time of CAG reexamination (P < 0.05). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that multi-vessel coronary artery disease (two-vessel coronary artery disease: OR=10.094, 95%CI 2.498 to 40.798, P=0.001; three-vessel coronary artery disease: OR=16.047, 95%CI 4.121 to 62.481, P=0.000) and low serum unconjugated bilirubin (OR=0.873, 95%CI 0.773 to 0.987, P=0.03) were independent risk factors of recurrent coronary events. ConclusionMulti-vessel coronary artery disease and low serum unconjugated bilirubin are independent risk factors of recurrent coronary events in patients after coronary artery stent implantation.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in treating coronary artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) by using meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library（Issue 4, 2016）, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the treatment of ISR by DEB from inception to April 2016. After two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed the bias risk of included studies, we carried out meta-analysis and TSA analysis by using RevMan 5.3 version and TSA v0.9 respectively. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1909 patients were included. Seven-hundred and forty-seven patients were included with regard to the comparison between DEB and POBA, 1162 patients were recruited to compare DEB and drug-eluting stents (DES). The results of meta-analysis revealed that DEB was associated with decreased mortality (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.93, P=0.04), compared with that of plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). And TSA showed that cumulative Z-curve strode the conventional threshold value but not the TSA threshold value which suggested a false positive result of meta-analysis. In comparison with that of POBA, DEB had a lower incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR=0.16, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.38, P＜0.01). And the result of TSA displayed that the cumulative Z-curve strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value which validated the result of meta-analysis. Besides, the results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in mortality (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.72, P=0.63) and TLR (OR=1.55, 95%CI 0.76 to 3.16, P=0.22) between DEB and DES. However, the result of TSA revealed that the cumulative Z-curve did not strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value, and the included sample size less was than required information size which suggested that the reliability of the meta-analysis needed more studies to confirm. While the subgroup analysis of EES revealed that DEB had a higher incidence of TLR than that of DEB (OR=3.37, 95%CI 1.59 to 7.15, P＜0.01). And the result of TSA displayed that the cumulative Z-curve strode both the conventional and TSA threshold value which validated the result of meta-analysis. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, EES is superior to DEB in decreasing the incidence of TLR in patients with ISR, while DEB is superior to POBA. However, the comparison of DEB and other strategies on reducing of mortality in patients with ISR still needed more studies to prove.