Objective To explore the status of women’s quality of life and analyze risk factors related diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Methods We applied the method of convenient sampling to investigate 61 patients with DOR (DOR group) and 60 women with normal ovarian reserve function (control group) who visited a reproductive centre of a Triple-A hospital from February to May 2013, using a questionnaire which included basic information table, Menopausal Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL) and SF-36 Health Survey for quality of life, and Kupperman Index Scale (KI) for the degree of clinical symptoms. Then, statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Results Compared with the control group (43.60±16.82), the level of women’s quality of life in the DOR group (73.42±24.15) was significantly lower (Plt;0.01), while the degree of clinical symptoms was significantly higher (Plt;0.01). There were positive associations between quality of life and degree of clinical symptoms. The risk factors related to DOR were various such as age, weight, quality of sleep, menstrual disorders, number of abortion, age of the first pregnancy, gynecologic surgery, economic income, education, family relationship, unsatisfactory sexual life, and psychological factors. Conclusion In order to improve women’s quality of life, effective treatment should be conducted to relieve clinical symptoms of women with DOR. Good life style, harmonious family relationship, healthy mind and avoiding the risk factors, which could effectively help the prevention and treatment of the disease.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LTME) vs. open total mesorectal excision (OTME) in treating rectal cancer. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) about LTME vs. OTME for rectal cancer were searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2014), EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data from the date of their establishment to April 2014. Other relevant journals and references of included studies were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was then conducted using RevMan 5.2. ResultsA total of fifteen RCTs involving 2 268 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis indicated that:a) for effectiveness, LTME and OTME were alike in resection length of the intestine (MD=-0.52, 95%CI-1.29 to 0.25, P=0.18), dissection number of lymph nodes (MD=-0.11, 95%CI-0.75 to 0.52, P=0.73), 1-year survival rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.52), and 3-year survival rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.04, P=0.63) with no significant difference. For safety, LTME had longer operation time (MD=29.64, 95%CI 14.90 to 44.39, P < 0.000 1); caused less intra-operative bleeding (MD=-105.51, 95%CI-133.95 to-77.08, P < 0.000 01); and shortened post-operative anal exsufflation time (MD=-0.99, 95%CI-1.35 to-0.62, P < 0.000 01), catheterization time (MD=-2.02, 95%CI-2.20 to-1.83, P < 0.000 01) as well as hospital stay (MD=-3.47, 95%CI-4.20 to-2.74, P < 0.000 01). Besides, LTME had less postoperative complications such as anastomotic leak (RR=0.67, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.22, P=0.19) and wound infection (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.73, P=0.002). However, LTME and OTME were alike in the incidence of intestinal obstruction (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.00, P=0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that LTME and OTME are alike in effectiveness, but LTME could cause less bleeding, shorten time of catheterization, post-operative anal exsufflation and hospital stay with less post-operative complications. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more larger sample, multicenter, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.