Objective To evaluate the clinical application of hand assisted laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer. Methods From June 2010 to September 2011，a series of 51 patients were undertook hand assisted laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy （hand assisted group），49 patients were undertook laparoscopic assisted D2 gastrectomy （laparoscopic group），the secure indexes of surgery effect in perioperative period were compared betwee two groups. Results The incision length was （6.82±0.33） cm and （5.74±1.11） cm （t=6.57，P=0.00），numbers of harvested lymph nodes were 16.10±5.11 and 14.16±3.60 （t=2.18，P=0.03），intraoperative bleeding was （249.40±123.40） ml and （251.00±90.40） ml （t=-0.74，P=0.94），operation time was （177.7±23.8） min and （188.1±16.9） min （t=-2.53，P=0.01），postoperative hospital stay was （11.12±5.02） d and （10.88±3.13） d （t=0.29，P=0.78） in the hand assisted group and in the laparoscopic group，respectively. One case of gastric atony happened in the hand assisted group，one case of gastric atony and incision infection happened in the laparoscopic group. No mortality case was found in two groups. Conclusions Hand assisted laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy is less difficult，and shorter operation time，and considerable treatment effection as compared with laparoscopic operation.
ObjectiveTo analyze short-term outcomes of hand assisted laparoscopic (HAL) D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and summarize clinical experiences. MethodsThe clinical data of 199 patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2 radical distal gastrectomy from December 2010 to December 2013 in this hospital were analyzed. HAL (HAL group, n=92) and traditonal open (TO group, n=107) D2 radical distal gastrectomy were performed. The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between these two groups. ResultsThere was no residue of cancer cells at the surgical margin in the HAL group and the TO group. Compared with the TO group, the average incision length was obviously shorter (P < 0.01) and the average intraoperative blood loss was obviously less (P < 0.05) in the HAL group. The average operation time, the average number of lymph nodes harvested, and the average postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the HAL group and the TO group (P > 0.05). One case was died of unknown gastrointestinal bleeding in the HAL group and the TO group, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was 9.78% (9/92) in the HAL group and 11.21% (12/107) in the TO group, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). ConclusionsHAL D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer don't increase operation time. It has some advantages of minimal invasion and safety as compared with traditional open surgery.