west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "后路减压" 6 results
  • A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN Coflex INTERSPINOUS DYNAMIC RECONSTRUCTION AND LUMBAR 360° FUSION IN TREATING SINGLE-LEVEL DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL DISORDERS

    Objective To compare the effectiveness and radiological changes of posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction or lumbar 360° fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4, 5. MethodsBetween October 2008 and November 2010, a comparative study was carried out on patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4, 5. In group A, 29 patients underwent posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction; there were 20 males and 9 females with an average age of 45.1 years (range, 21-67 years); and the disease duration was 2 months to 4 years. In group B, 31 patients underwent posterior decompression combined with lumbar 360° fusion treatment; there were 16 males and 15 females with an average age of 56.2 years (range, 32-86 years); and the disease duration was 3 months to 6 years. Except the age, there was no significant difference in gender, disease duration, and etiology etc. between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The results were assessed by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI). The range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral height of affected and adjacent segments, and the ROM of lumbar were measured before operation and last follow-up. Results Significant differences were found in the operative time and blood loss between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). Intraoperative dural tear occurred in 1 case of group B, spinal canal venous plexus hemorrhage in 1 case of group B, and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 cases of group A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.119, P =0.731). The follow-up was 12-21 months in group A and was 12-23 months in group B. At the last follow-up, the JOA, VAS scores, and ODI of groups A and B were significantly improvedwhen compared with the preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). The VAS score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the intervertebral height of L4, 5 and L5, S1 of groups A and B between pre- and post-operation (P gt; 0.05). In group B, the intervertebral height of L3, 4 was significantly reduced (P lt; 0.05) compared with the preoperative one. There was no significant difference in the ROM of L5, S1 and ROM of lumbar in groups A and B between preand post-operation (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the ROM of L4, 5 was significantly reduced in group A (P lt; 0.05), and the ROM of L3, 4 was significantly increased in group B (P lt; 0.05). Except significant differences in the intervertebral height and ROM of L3, 4 between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), no significant difference was found in other parameters (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction has the same effectiveness as lumbar 360° fusion in treating degenerative lumbar spinal disorders at L4, 5, but the former has a protective effect on the adjacent segments of fusion and is recommended for initial treatment of young adults and the elderly and frail patients with recurrent.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Posterior Internal Fixation with Vertebral Pedicle Screw and Bar System to Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures

    目的:探讨经后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法: 对本组35例胸腰椎骨折行后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定,其中20例行术中后路减压, 8例经椎弓根行病椎植骨。35例均行关节突及横突间植骨。并测量术前、术后伤椎前后缘平均高度(百分比)和Cobb’s角,椎管截面积.结果: 术后伤椎前后缘平均高度(百分比)和Cobb’s角,椎管截面积各项指标与术前相比较,差异有显著性 (Plt;0.01)。术后随访9~21个月,平均13.2个月。无一例出现神经症状加重,2例出现内固定断裂并完整取出。结论: 经后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效确切,是治疗胸腰椎骨折的一种创伤小,操作简单,固定可靠的手术方法。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF POSTERIOR CERVICAL DECOMPRESSIVE LAMINECTOMY AND LATERAL MASS SCREW FIXATION COMBINED WITH FORAMINOTOMY FOR CERVICAL RADICULO-MYELOPATHY

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of posterior cervical decompressive laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation combined with foraminotomy for treating cervical radiculo-myelopathy. MethodsBetween January 2010 and January 2012, 58 patients with cervical radiculo-myelopathy were treated by posterior cervical decompressive laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation combined with foraminotomy. There were 31 males and 27 females, with an average age of 52.7 years (range, 41-72 years). The mean disease course was 5.4 years (range, 3-15 years). The preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was 7.8±1.3, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.8±1.7. There were 37 cases of inter-vertebral disc herniation and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, 11 cases of vertebral osteophyte formation with the osteophyte spinal canal occupational ratio of 51.7%±18.1%, and 10 cases of inter-vertebral disc herination with cervical instability. Preoperative cervical curvature was (-5.5±12.5)°. The fixed segments included C3-7 in 29 cases, C4-7 in 19 cases, and C3-6 in 10 cases. Foraminotomy was performed in 135 nerve foramina (mean, 2.33 foramina). ResultsThe mean operation time was 204 minutes (range, 167-260 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 273 mL (range, 210-378 mL). No injury of vertebral artery or nerve root occurred during operation. Postoperative subcutaneous hematoma and cervical axial pain occurred in 1 case and 8 cases, respectively; and no nerve root palsy was observed. The patients were followed up 2.1-4.3 years (mean, 3.4 years). The postoperative JOA score was significantly increased to 14.1±1.7 (t=-27.672, P=0.000), with an improvement rate of 68.5%±21.9%. Postoperative VAS score was significantly decreased to 2.1±1.1 (t=15.168, P=0.000). The imaging examination showed adjacent segmental degeneration in 1 patient, who had no clinical symptom. There was no screw loosening or pseudoarthrosis formation during follow-up. The cervical curvature was (13.6±5.1)° at 5 days and was (13.2±4.8)° at 2 years, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (P < 0.05). The osteophyte spinal canal occupational ratio was 36.5%±10.4% at 2 years, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=6.921, P=0.000). ConclusionThe procedure of posterior cervical decompressive laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation combined with foraminotomy is effect in treating cervical radiculo-myelopathy. The spinal cord and nerve root can be adequately decompressed by laminectomy and foraminotomy. The lateral mass screw fixation can correct the cervical curvature and further reduce the tension to spinal cord.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative study of decompression and non-decompression surgeries in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with intraspinal occupying and without neurological symptoms

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness of posterior non-decompression surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptoms by comparing with the conventional posterior decompression surgery. Methods Between October 2008 and October 2015, a total of 97 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with intraspinal occupying 1/3-1/2 and without neurological symptoms were divided into the decompression surgery group (51 cases) and the non-decompression surgery group (46 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, injury segment, the thoracolumbar injury severity score (TLICS), combined injury, disease duration, and preoperative relative anterior vertebral height, kyphosis Cobb angle, intraspinal occupying percentage, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative drainage, bed rest time, hospitalization time, and relative anterior vertebral height, kyphosis Cobb angle, intraspinal occupying percentage, and VAS score, ODI, JOA score at preoperative and postoperative 3 days and 1 year were recorded and compared. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, and postoperative drainage in non-decompression surgery group were significantly less than those in decompression surgery group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative bed rest time and hospitalization time between 2 groups (P>0.05). In decompression surgery group, 4 cases had cerebrospinal fluid leakage and healed after conservative treatment. All incisions healed by first intention, and no nerve injury or infection of incision occurred. All patients were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 11.7 months). The recovery of vertebral body height was satisfactory in 2 groups, without secondary kyphosis and secondary nerve symptoms. The imaging indexes and effectiveness scores of 2 groups at 3 days and 1 year after operation were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). The intraspinal occupying percentage, VAS score, and ODI at 1 year after operation were significantly lower than those at 3 days after operation in 2 groups (P<0.05), and JOA score at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that at 3 days after operation (P<0.05). Relative anterior vertebral height at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that at 3 days after operation in non-decompression surgery group (P<0.05); and there was no significant difference in decompression surgery group (P>0.05). At 3 days, the intraspinal occupying percentage and JOA score in non-decompression surgery group were higher than those in decompression surgery group (P<0.05), and VAS score and ODI at 3 days in non-decompression surgery group were lower than those in decompression surgery group (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the other indexes between 2 groups at 3 days and 1 year after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the posterior decompression surgery, posterior non-decompression surgery has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, less postoperative pain, and so on. It is an ideal choice for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with intraspinal occupying 1/3-1/2 and without neurological symptoms under the condition of strict indication of operation.

    Release date:2017-08-03 03:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative scoliosis with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of decompression and short fusion or long fusion for degenerative scoliosis (DS) with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 50 patients with DS who were treated with decompression combined with short fusion or long fusion between January 2015 and May 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into long fusion group (fixed segments>3, 23 cases) and short fusion group (fixed segments≤3, 27 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic title (PT), and sacral slope (SS) between the two groups (P>0.05); however, the VAS score of low back pain, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in long fusion group were significantly higher than those in short fusion group (P<0.05), and the lumbar lordosis (LL) was significantly lower than that in short fusion group (t=2.427, P=0.019). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, hospital stay, and complications were recorded and compared. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes before operation and at last follow-up. X-ray films of the whole spine in standard standing position were taken before operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the spino-pelvic parameters were measured.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the short fusion group were significantly less than those in the long fusion group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (t=0.933, P=0.355). The patients were followed up 12-46 months with an average of 22.3 months. At last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI score significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Except for the improvement of VAS score of low back pain (t=8.332, P=0.000), the differences of the improvements of the other scores between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). The Cobb angle, SVA, TLK, and PT significantly decreased, while SS and LL significantly increased in the long fusion group (P<0.05), while the Cobb angle and PT significantly decreased and SS significantly increased in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in spino-pelvic parameters between the two groups at 6 months after operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The improvements of Cobb angle, SVA, LL, PT, and SS in the long fusion group were significantly higher than those in the short fusion group at last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in both groups. The incidence of complications in the long fusion group was 34.8% (8/23), which was significantly higher than that in the short fusion group [11.1% (3/27)] (χ2=4.056, P=0.034).ConclusionThe DS patients with the Cobb angle of 20-40°can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and improve the spino-pelvic parameters by choosing appropriate fixation levels. Short fusion has less surgical trauma and fewer complications, whereas long fusion has more advantages in enhancing spino-pelvic parameters and relieving low back pain.

    Release date:2020-04-15 09:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Learning curve analysis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion

    Objective To analyze the learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF). Methods Fifty-five patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with UBE-LIF between December 2020 and February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were grouped according to the operation sequence, the first 27 cases were in the early group, and the last 28 cases were in the late group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease type, and surgical segment distribution (P>0.05). The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss (the difference between 1 day before operation and 3 days after operation), the hospital stay after operation, and the incidence of perioperative complications were recorded; the learning curve of UBE-LIF was analyzed by log-curve regression analysis. Results All the operations were successfully completed without changing to other operations. The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss, and hospital stay in the early group were significantly more than those in the late group (P<0.05). Complications occurred in 2 cases (7.4%) in the early group, including 1 case of dural tear during operation and 1 case of epidural hematoma after operation, and 1 case (3.6%) with transient radiculitis in the late group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.518) . The log-curve regression analysis showed that the operation time decreased significantly with the increase of the number of patients (P<0.05). The operation time tended to be stable after the surgeon completed 17 cases. ConclusionFor single-level lumbar degenerative disease, the operation time of UBE-LIF can decrease gradually with the increase of the number of patients, and tend to be stable after 17 cases.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content