Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of MR imaging in cervical spinal canal stenosis combined with spinal cord injury. Methods From August 1998 to May 2008, 41 patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis and spinal cord injury were treated, including 34 males and 7 females aged 32-71 years (average 53.4 years, 27 patients being older than 60 years). Patients’ MRI data were retrospectively analyzed. Injury was caused by fall ing from height in 8 cases, traffic accidentin 19 cases, crush due to heavy objects in 3 cases and other reasons in 11 cases. The time from injury to operation ranged from 2 hours to 3 years. There were 12 cases of anterior spinal cord injury syndrome, 23 of central spinal cord syndrome and 6 of Brown-Sequard syndrome. JOA score of spinal cord function was 3-11 points (average 6.6 points). Results MR imaging diagnosis before operation showed abnormal signal changes within the spinal cord in 37 cases (41 sites), anterior and posterior longitudinal l igaments and discs (APLLD) injury in 28 cases (30 sites) and signal of edema and hematoma signals in anterior surface of cervical spines (EBC) in 34 cases (36 sites). Diagnosis during operation revealed edemas braises, contusions tears of posterior soft tissue in 18 cases (20 sites), appendix fracture in 6 cases (7 sites), formation of EBC in 20 cases (23 sites), APLLD injury in 34 cases (44 sites), intervertebral instabil ity without the rupture of l igament and intervertebral disc in 7 cases (10 sites). Significant difference was evident between the MRI diagnosis before operation and the intraoperative discoveries (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The MR imaging diagnosis before operation do not correspond to the intraoperative discoveries, indicating that MRI diagnosis fails to make a relatively comprehensive and accurate diagnosis. So it is advisable to make a diagnosis based on cl inical symptoms.
目的总结彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗腹腔脓肿的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析我院2003年1月至2013年3月期间对124例腹腔脓肿患者采取彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗的临床资料。 结果124例腹腔脓肿患者中治愈118例（95.2%）；6例未治愈（4.8%），经手术治疗后痊愈。全组置管均顺利，未发生出血、腹腔脏器受损等严重并发症。间隔1～3个月来院复查B超，随访患者106例（85.5%），随访（7±2.43）个月未见复发。 结论选择性采用彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗腹腔脓肿微创、安全及有效。
ObjectiveTo examine the cause of failure of mitral valve repair. MethodWe retrospectively anal-yzed the clinical data of 89 consecutive patients with non-rheumatic mitral valve diseases who underwent reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair in our hospital from January 2009 through January 2016. There were 54 males and 35 females at age of 36.2±17.4 years. ResultsThere were 16 patients with reoperation of mitral valve repairs and 73 patients of mitral valve replacements. The failure reasons of initial mitral valve repair were technique-related in 63 patients (70.8%) and valve-related in 18 patients (20.2%). Technique-related causes of repair failure included leaflet suture dehiscence (20 patients, 22.5%), edge-to-edge procedure (11 patients, 12.4%), leaflet thickening or retraction (11 patients, 12.4%), ring dehiscence (8 patients, 9.0%), inappropriate annuloplasty (6 patients, 6.7%), incomplete repair (4 patients, 4.5%), and chordal elongation or rupture (3 patients, 3.4%). Median interval since previous repair was 4.0 (0.04-18.0) years for the technique-related failure group, and 9.7 (0.21-35.6) years for valve-related failure group (P < 0.05). ConclusionTechnique-related factors are main causes of repair failure, which include leaflet suture dehiscence, edge-to-edge procedure, and leaflet thickening or retraction. Reoperation for technique-related failure needs to be adopted early.
Objective To explore the safety and complications of repeated sternotomy after mitral valve repair and prevention strategies. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 88 consecutive patients of non-rheumatic mitral valve disease who underwent repeated sternotomy for failure of first-time mitral valve repair in our hospital from January 2009 through June 2015. There were 53 males and 35 females with a mean age of 36.1±17.5 years in the patients who underwent repeated sternotomy. Meanwhile 88 patients who underwent the first-time sternotomy for mitral valve repair simultaneously were randomly recruited as a control group, and there were 57 males and 31 females with a mean age of 39.9±12.6 years. The clinical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively and compared between the two groups. Results No major injury was observed in the patients who underwent repeated sternotomy. Eight patients (9.1%) in the repeated sternotomy group required femoral artery cannulation. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was longer in the femoral artery cannulation group than that in the aortic cannulation group (155.5±59.0 minvs. 119.5±39.9 min,P=0.023). While there was no statistical difference in aortic cross-clamp time (P=0.786). Eight patients (9.1%) in the repeated sternotomy group used extra-pericardium approach. There was no significant difference in CPB time (P=0.255) or aortic cross-clamp time (P=0.360) between the patients who used extra-pericardium approach and those used routine approach. There was no statistical difference in post-operative complications between the patients who used different sternotomy strategies. Although CPB time (123.0±3.0 minvs. 95.4±37.1 min,P=0.000) or aortic cross-clamp time (79.0±36.3 minvs. 67.5±29.1 min,P=0.026) was longer in the repeated sternotmy group, the major outcomes were similar between the repeated sternotmy group and the first-time sternotmy group (P＞0.05). Conclusion Repeated sternotomy after mitral valve repair is relatively safe. With appropriate strategies, repeated sternotomy is not associated with increased risk of operative morbidity.
Objective To compare the in-hospital and midterm outcomes after simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods One hundred thirty-two diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent one-stop HCR at Fuwai Hospital from January 2010 to January 2015. These patients were 1∶2 matched with those who underwent OPCAB using propensity score matching. Results Simultaneous HCR had less chest tube drainage (618 (420, 811) ml vs. 969 (711, 1 213)ml, P<0.001), lower transfusion rate (19.7%vs. 34.1%, P=0.026), shorter mechanical ventilation time (11.6 (8.2, 14.8) h vs. 16.0 (12.1, 18.7) h, P<0.001), and shorter stay in intensive care unit (21.5 (18.8, 42.0) hvs. 44.6 (23.7, 70.1) h, P<0.001) than OPCAB. During over median 40 months follow-up, simultaneous HCR offered similar major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate (6.8%vs 9.0%, P=0.826), but lower stroke rate (0% vs 3.0%, P=0.029), compared with OPCAB. Conclusion For selected patients with diabetes, simultaneous HCR provides a safe and effective revascularization alternative. It decreases perioperative invasiveness and incurred similar and favorable midterm outcomes with OPCAB.
Objective To evaluate a score system to allow stratification of complexity in degenerative mitral valve repair. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 312 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for mitral valve repair and whose preoperative echocardiography was referable in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2013. A scoring system for surgical complexity was used based mainly on the preoperative echocardiography findings. Complexity of mitral valve repair was scored as 1 to 9, and patients were categorized into 3 groups based on the score for surgical complexity: a simple group (1 point), an intermediate group (2-4 points) and a complex group (≥5 points). There were 86 males and 35 females in the simple group (n=121) with an average age of 51.6±12.6 years, 105 males and 53 females in the intermediate group (n=158) with an average age of 51.1±12.8 years and 25 males and 8 females in the complex group (n=33) with an average age of 49.3±13.0 years. Results There was significant difference in surgical complexity in different groups. In the simple, intermediate and complex groups, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 111.7±45.5 min, 117.7±40.4 min and 153.4±74.2 min (P<0.001), the mean cross-clamping time was 77.5±33.8 min, 83.2±29.9 min and 108.8±56.2 min (P<0.001), and the mean number of repair techniques utilized was 2.1±0.4, 2.4±0.6 and 2.8±0.8 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the early and late outcomes in different groups. Conclusion It is feasible to use echocardiography to quantitatively evaluate the difficulty of mitral valvuloplasty.
ObjectiveTo assess mid- and long-term outcomes and share our clinical method of reduction ascending aortoplasty (RAA) in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 41 adult patients with aortic valve disease and ascending aortic dilatation before and after operation of RAA+AVR in Fuwai Hospital from January 2010 to July 2017. There were 28 male and 13 female patients aged 28-76 (53.34±12.06) years. Twenty-three patients received AVR+RAA using the sandwich technique (a sandwich technique group), while other 18 patients received AVR+ascending aorta wrap (a wrapping technique group). Ascending aorta diameter (AAD) was measured by echocardiography or CT scan preoperatively and postoperatively.ResultsThere was no perioperative death. The mean preoperative AAD in the sandwich technique group and the wrapping technique group (47.04±3.44 mm vs. 46.67±2.83 mm, P=0.709) was not statistically different. The mean postoperative AAD (35.87±3.81 mm vs. 35.50±5.67 mm, P=0.804), and the mean AAD at the end of follow-up (41.26±6.54 mm vs. 38.28±4.79 mm, P=0.113) were also not statistically different between the two groups. There were statistical differences in AAD before, after operation and at follow-up in each group. All 41 patients were followed up for 23-108 (57.07±28.60) months, with a median follow-up of 51.00 months. Compared with that before discharge, the AAD growth rate at the last follow-up was –1.50-6.78 mm/year, with a median growth rate of 0.70 mm/year, and only 3 patients had an annual growth rate of above 3 mm/year.ConclusionMid- and long-term outcomes of RAA in adult patients undergoing AVR with both methods are satisfying and encouraging.