Objective To investigate the evaluation, risk factors and intervening measures of postoperative delirium in patients after liver transplantation, and to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods The relevant literatures on delirium after liver transplantation at home and abroad in recent years were consulted. Based on the definition of postoperative delirium, the research status, evaluation tools and evaluation frequency at home and abroad were reviewed. From the aspects of donor and recipient, the influencing factors by connecting preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stages and angles were explored. Results The incidence of postoperative delirium in patients with liver transplantation was high, and the risk factors were numerous, which ran through before and after liver transplantation. In terms of research type, most domestic and foreign studies were retrospective, single center, small sample surveys, with different assessment tools and assessment frequency. There were few high-quality intervention studies on delirium after liver transplantation. Conclusions Delirium after liver transplantation is predictable, evaluable and treatable. Effective risk assessment and screening are very important. Intervention for patients undergoing liver transplantation who develop postoperative delirium requires a combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.
ObjectiveTo determine the effects of the management mode participated by doctors, nurses and patients on the safety of medical tubes for restlessness patients in the Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit (NICU). MethodsA total of 133 restlessness patients treated between May 17 and November 22, 2013 were included in the study as control group, who were admitted to the NICU before application of the management mode participated by doctors, nurses and patients; another 119 restlessness patients treated between May 17 and November 22, 2014 were included in the study as research group, who were admitted to the NICU after application of the management mode participated by doctors, nurses and patients. Then we compared the accidental extubation situation between the two groups. ResultsThe accidental extubation rate of all kinds of medical tubes in the research group was lower than that in the control group, among which the extubation rate of urethral catheter (0.67% vs. 4.32%), gastric tube (2.26% vs. 10.14%), trachea cannula (1.08% vs. 7.84%), and arterial cannulation pipeline (1.12% vs. 6.93%) was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). ConclusionThe management mode participated by doctors, nurses and patients can effectively reduce the accidental extubation rate of medical tubes for restlessness patients, prevent the occurrence of adverse events and ensure the treatment and nursing safety in the NICU.
ObjectiveTo review the effect and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in liver transplant recipients.MethodsA comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, etc. was performed using keywords “ERAS” or “fast track” and “liver transplantation” (cut-off date June 3, 2020). The relevant literatures on researches of ERAS in liver transplant recipients at home and abroad in recent years were summarized.ResultsERAS effectively could promote the functional recovery of postoperative food intake and physical activities through systemic perioperative measures different from conventional management among the liver transplant recipients. In addition, loads of studies had revealed that ERAS was safe for liver transplant recipients with positive effects in different dimensions such as controlling complications, shortening hospital stays, and reducing medical expenses, etc.ConclusionERAS can effectively promote functional recovery of liver transplant recipients without increasing risk.
ObjectiveTo explore effect of rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation on hospital stay and complications after liver transplantation. MethodsThe convenience sampling method was used to collect the liver transplant patients in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The patients underwent the rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation from January 2017 to December 2017 as the study group and the patients underwent the routine management measures from January 2015 to December 2016 as the control group. The postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay time and postoperative hospitalization time were recorded and the postoperative complications were observed. ResultsA total of 175 patients with liver transplantation were included, including 78 cases in the study group and 97 cases in the control group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, hemoglobin, leukocyte count, platelet count, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, prothrombin time, acute liver failure, model for end-stage liver disease score, liver transplantation mode, operation time, and intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative ICU stay time and postoperative hospitalization time were shorter and the incidences of total postoperative complications and gade of complications were lower in the study group as compared with the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionFrom preliminary results of this study, rapid rehabilitation management measures by multidisciplinary cooperation could shorten postoperative ICU stay time and postoperative hospitalization time, reduce incidence of postoperative complications, and be more conducive to postoperative rehabilitation.
Objective To compare the application effects of two kinds of oxygen and nebulizer inhalation devices applied to patients undergoing partial hepatectomy, with a view to providing reference for clinical selection oxygen and nebulizer inhalation modality. Methods A prospective case-control study was used to select 228 patients who required oxygen inhalation and nebulization after hepatectomy under general anesthesia in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January to December 2022 as study subjects, and were randomly divided into two groups: grouping group (n=77) and integrating group (n=151). The traditional oxygen inhalation device and atomization device (grouping oxygen inhalation atomization device) commonly used in clinic were used in the grouping group, and the humidifying bottle and humidifying water were replaced every 24 hours. The integrating group adopts a new device (integrated oxygen atomization inhalation device) which integrates oxygen inhalation and atomization functions. The integrating group was divided into integrating group 1 (n=77) and integrating group 2 (n=74) according to the different time of changing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating 1 was the same as that in the grouping group. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating group 2 was 48 h after used, and replace again it after 72 hours of used. Samples from different parts of the grouping group and the integrating group 1 were collected at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 120 h after oxygen inhalation, respectively, for colony culture. In the integrating group 2, samples were taken for colony culture when the device was changed twice (48 h and 120 h). At the same time, the nurses’ fogging operation time and the fogging noise of the two groups were measured. The self-made patients’ satisfaction questionnaire and nurses’ questionnaire were used to investigate the satisfaction of two groups of patients and 30 medical staff respectively. Results There were no statistically significant difference in the number of bacterial colonies between the grouping group and the integrating group 1 at different time periods and between the two groups at the same time (P＞0.05). In terms of atomization performance, atomization noise in the integrating group was lower than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05), and the atomization preparation and disposal time in the integrating group were shorter than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05). The patients and nurses were more satisfied with the integrating group (P＜0.05). Conclusions There is no difference in pollution risk between the integrated oxygen atomization bottle and the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The atomization performance and humidification performance of the integrated oxygen atomization bottle are better than that of the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The noise generated during operation is small, the comfort of patients is high, and the operation time of nurses can be shortened and the work efficiency can be improved, which has high clinical application value.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of novel coronavirus infection rapid screening tool for liver transplantation donors.MethodsClinical data of 14 cases of organ donation for cardiac death from February 2020 to May 2020 were collected, and risk screening was conducted by using novel coronavirus infection rapid screening tool of liver transplantation donor.ResultsThe risk screening results of 14 donors showed that 9 were at moderate risk and 5 were at low risk. After two negative nucleic acid tests and case discussion, the organ of 9 medium-risk donors could be used. Ten cases were performed the liver transplantion, and all patients recovered smoothly after operation, and no novel coronavirus infection occurred.ConclusionNovel coronavirus rapid screening tool for liver transplantation has shown certain clinical value, which needs to be further verified and improved.