Abstract: Objective To evaluate the early and long-term results for the management of giant left ventricular aneurysm with comparison of different surgical ventricular restructive approaches. Methods Between January 1992 and December 2004, 148 consecutive patients underwent repair of giant left ventricular aneurysms and were divided into two groups, conventional group： 89 patients were submitted to linear repair; modified group： 59 patients were submitted to endocardium encircle suturing remodeling（EESR）. There were no significant difference in New York Heart Association （NYHA） class Ⅲ /Ⅳ , left ventricular dysfunction before operation, aortic clamp time and number of coronary bypass grafts in two groups. Results Five patients died after operation （3. 4%）, 4 cases in conventional group and 1 case in modified group, the hospital mortality rate was 4.5% vs. 1.7% （P=0. 320）. The major morbidity were low cardiac output syndrome and ventricular fibrillation. One hundred and thirty-four patients （93.7 % ） were followed up, during a mean follow-up of 51.4± 27.0 months （range 1-120 months）, 21 patients had died. The NYHA class more than m in the early stage after operation was the independent risk factor for late death （P= 0. 000）. Actuarial survival rates were 91.6% of modified group vs. 76.3% of conventional group at 5 years （P=0.040）, and 91.6% vs. 61.4% at 8 years（P=0.000）. At late follow-up the meanNYHAclass, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension （LVEDD） and left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） were significant improved （P = 0. 000）in both groups. The rate of re-dilatation of LVEDD was higher in conventional group than that in modified group （ 38.8% vs. 16.7%, P= 0. 030）. Conclusion The technique of repair of postinfarction dyskinetic giant left ventricular aneurysms should be adapted in each patient to the cavity size and shape, and the dimension of the scar. The EESR achieves better results with respect to perioperative mortality, late functional status and survival than linear repair.