Objective To determine the effect of closed tracheal suction system versus open tracheal suction system on the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), PubMed (1966 to 2006) and CBM (1980 to 2007), and also hand searched relevant journals. Randomized controlled trials involving closed tracheal suction system versus open tracheal suction system for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults were included. Data were extracted and the quality of trials was critical assessed by two reviewers independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for data analyses. Result Five randomized controlled trials involving 739 patients were included. Results of meta-analyses showed that compared to open tracheal suction system, closed tracheal suction system did not increase the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.37) or case fatality (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.31). No significant differences were observed between open tracheal suction system and closed tracheal suction system in the total number of bacteria (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.37), the number of SPP colony (RR 2.87, 95%CI 0.94 to 8.74) and the number of PSE colony (RR 1.46, 95%CI 0.76 to 2.77). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of ventilation and length of hospital stay. Conclusion Open or closed tracheal suction systems have similar effects on the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia, case fatality, the number of SPP and PSE colonies, duration of ventilation and length of hospital stay. However, due to the differences in interventions and statistical power among studies included in this systematic review, further studies are needed to determine the effect of closed or open tracheal suction systems on these outcomes.
【摘要】 目的 探讨密闭式吸痰和开放式吸痰两种方式对预防心胸外科术后机械通气患者呼吸道感染的效果。 方法 2009年9月－2010年8月，将86例心胸外科术后机械通气患者随机分为两组，试验组应用密闭式吸痰法，对照组采用开放式吸痰法。观察两组患者术后机械通气治疗即刻及至拔出气管插管后48 h内每日痰培养结果、每4小时监测一次体温、血常规检查及胸片结果、呼吸机相关性肺炎（ventilator associated pneumonia，VAP）发生情况。 结果 两组患者在年龄、性别、病种方面差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），但痰培养结果阳性率、VAP发生率差异均有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。两组发生VAP患者的痰培养病原菌检出情况:试验组均为G-菌；对照组以G-菌为主，余者为真菌-白色念珠菌。 结论 密闭式吸痰法预防心胸外科术后机械通气患者呼吸道感染效果较开放式吸痰法好。G-菌和真菌-白色念珠菌耐药性强，治疗难度大，临床中应重视呼吸道感染的预防。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effects of closed endotracheal suctioning (CS) and open endotracheal suctioning (OS) on the prevention of respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Methods From September 2009 to August 2010, 86 mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery were randomly divided into two groups. CS and OS were provided for patients in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. The sputum culture result, body temperature every four hours, blood routine examination and chest X-ray result, and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were observed and compared between the two groups at the admission to the ICU and once a day thereafter. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in sex, age, or kinds of diseases (Pgt;0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups in the positive rate of sputum culture results and the incidence of VAP (Plt;0.05). The pathogens isolation in sputum culture of VAP patients were all Gram-negative bacteria in the experimental group, and mainly Gram-negative bacteria followed by fungi-Blastomyces albicans in the control group. Conclusions CS is more effective than OS in the prevention of respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. The drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria and fungi-Blastomyces albicans is b, and the treatments of those bacteria are difficult. Thereafter, we should pay more attention to the prevention of respiratory tract infection.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effects of time-worn ritual endotracheal suction (TRES) and on-demand invasive airway suction (OIAS) for patients.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TRES with OIAS for patients. The studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were assessed and data were extracted from them. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data.ResultsSeventeen randomized controlled trials were included finally, and 2 029 patients were included, involving 1 028 patients in the control group and 1 001 patients in the experimental group. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with TRES, OIAS could reduce the damage to the airway mucosa injury (RR=0.18, 95%CI 0.13 - 0.26, P<0.000 01), reduce secondary respiratory infections (RR=0.44, 95%CI 0.30 - 0.65, P<0.000 1), decrease the occurrence of phlegm blockade (RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.13 - 0.33, P<0.000 01), shorten the hospital stay (MD=5.03, 5%CI 3.17 - 6.89, P<0.000 01), but not influence the drop in oxygen saturation and the drop in blood oxygen pressure (RR=0.50, 95%CI 0.21 - 1.17, P=0.11). However there was no significant difference in mortality between two groups (P=0.46).ConclusionOIAS is preferred for patients who need suction than TRES.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of closed and open tracheal suction system on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, Airiti Library, PubMed, CINAHL and Proquest databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on closed and open tracheal suction system on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 187 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with open tracheal suction system, closed tracheal suction system was associated with a reduced incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.67, P<0.000 01), late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.80, P=0.005), length of stay in intensive care unit (MD=−0.85, 95%CI −1.66 to −0.04, P=0.04) and rate of microbial colonization (RR=0.69, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.86, P=0.000 9). However, there were no significant differences between two groups in time to ventilator-associated pneumonia development (MD=0.96, 95%CI −0.21 to 2.12, P=0.11), length of mechanical ventilation (MD=−2.24, 95%CI −4.54 to 0.06, P=0.06), and rate of mortality (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.05, P=0.15).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that compared with open tracheal suction system, closed tracheal suction system can reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia, shorten the hospital stay in intensive care unit, and reduce rate of microbial colonization. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.