Objective To observe the efficiency and safety of a single intravi treal injection of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods Prospective, open label study of 18 eyes of 18 patients with diabetic macular edema which was diagnosed by examination of regular inspection, fundus fluorescein angiography(FFA) and optic coherence tomography(OCT). The patients without general or partial surgery contraindications, aged from 34-75 years with a mean age of 54plusmn;11 years. The best corrected visual acuity of logMAR was 1.023plusmn;0.45 and the retinal thickness of macular foveal was 486 mu;m before the treatment. The eyes have intravitreal injection with Bevacizumab at dose 1.5 mg (0. 06 ml). After the treatment, the follow-up period ranging from 12 to 20 weeks (m e an 16plusmn;4 weeks). The changes of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, OCT and FFA before and after the treatment were observed and analyzed. Results All 18 patients had a mean logMAR BCVA of 1.023plusmn;0.45 at baseline and at the follow-up weeks 1, 4, 12, the mean logMAR BCVA was significantly improved as 0.864plusmn;0.48 （P=0.001）, 0.739plusmn;0.51 (P=0.003), 0.792plusmn;0.50 (P=0.015) respectively, and the differences are statistically significant compared with before. Sixteen eyes (88.9%) had a improved or stable visual acuity, the BCVA increased 2 lines (0.2 logMAR vision) or better in 10 eyes (55.6%) and decreased in 2 eyes at 12 weeks after injection. OCT demonstrated that retinal thickness of macular foveal decreased from 486 mu;m to 413 mu;m at 4 weeks, decreased to 383mu;m at 12 weeks（P=0.002， P=0.001）, and the differences are statistically significant compared with before. There are remarkable resolution of central retinal edema in 13 eyes (72.2%) at 12 weeks after the injection. No local or systemic adverse events were observed in any patients. Conclusions The preliminary result in our observati on showed that int ravitreal injection of Bevacizumab therapy was well tolerated with a significant improvement in BCVA and decrease in macular edema for patients with diabetic macular edema. A randomly controlled multicenter clinical trial is necessary. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2008,24:172-175)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and security of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsA total of 41 eyes in 37 patients with macular edema who measured up were collected, including 21 eyes of 21 cases in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) group, 17 eyes of 13 cases in diabetic retinopathy (DR) group, and 3 eyes of 3 cases in the other-causes group. Before the treatment, the average visual acuity was 0.07, 0.06, and 0.08 in the 3 groups respectively, and the mean thickness of macular fovea detected by optic coherence tomography (OCT) was (974±394) and (873±213) in RVO and DR group, respectively. Intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA (40 mg/ml) was performed on each patient. The average follow-up duration was 8 months after the treatment. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), changes of lens and ocular fundus, and retinal thichness at macular area before and after the treatment was observed and compared.ResultsAll eyes except one had improved visual acuity. The mean visual acuity improved to 0.25, 0.20, and 0.35 in the 3 groups respectively 6 months after the treatment. Alleviated or reducing macular edema was found in all of the patients. The average retinal thickness at macular fovea was (173±41) and (204±76) in RVO and DR group respectively 1 month after the treatment, which had statistical significance compared with that before the treatment (t =8.323, 6.842; P＜0.01). The intraocular pressure was ＞21 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) in 6 eyes (14.6%), which mostly happened 1 week to 2 months after the injection, and was controlled to normal level after partially treated with βreceptor retarder. The cataract developed in 1 eye, and another patient with macular edema after vitrectomy due to diabetes had macular hole 2 months after the injection. There were 2 eyes underwent intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA 4-5 months after the first treatment due to the recurrence of macular edema in RVO and DR group respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is a promising therapeutic method for macular edema that fails to respond to conventional treatment. Transient elevation of ocular pressure is the most common side effect. Further study is needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:209-212)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on macular edema.MothodHaving been examined by ophthalmoscopy, optic coherent tomography (OCT), retinal thickness analyzer (RTA), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), 33 patients (37 eyes) with diffused and (or) cystoid macular edema caused by diabetes and retinal venous occlusion were intravitreously injected with 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). During 1-9 month followup period, the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, inflammatory extent, manifestation of lens and fundus were observed, the retinal thickness was examined by OCT and RTA, and vascular leakage were detected by FFA.ResultsMacular thickness was (244.07±118.80), (195.53±57.70), and (181.42±54.79) μm respectively 1, 2, 3 months after treatment; while macular thickness was (724.35±227.41) μm before the treatment. The difference was statistically significant （t =10.72, 12.84, 13.90; P lt;0.001）. The visual acuity was 0.39±0.19, 0.45±0.24, and 0.43±0.21 respectively, comparing with the visual acuity before the treatment (0.20±0.16), the difference was statistically significant （t =4.445, 4.349, 3.474; P lt;0.001, lt;0.001, 0.03）；The result of FFA showed less leakage of fluorescein and proliferative lesion. Four pateints had the ocular pressure ≥25 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) in 9 who had ≥20 mm Hg. Recurrence of macular edema was found in 4 eyes of 3 patients 4 and 6 months after the treatment, respectively. No infection or aggravation of lenticular turbidness occurred.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA can be used to treat macular edema due to diabetes and retinal venous occlusion, and recurrence of macular edema or increase of intraocular pressure may occur in some patients.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:205-208)
ObjectiveTo seek the evidencebased medicine (EBM) evidences of curative effects of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsAll articles of intravitreous injection TA for macular edema published in English or Chinese were picked up from databases of MEDLINE and CNKI and then evaluated according to EBM standard. The data in accord with research standard were selected by using excluding and including criteria, and classified according to the appraisal standard of clinical therapeutic documents. ResultsIn the selected papers, none in gradeⅠevidence; 1 in gradeⅡevidence; 7 in grade Ⅲ evidence; 24 in grade Ⅳ evidence; and 19 in gradeⅤevidence. Forty-two papers reported that intravitreous injection with TA had significant effect for macular edema within 3 months, and the improvement of visual acuity was recorded in these papers. Regression of macular edema was recorded in 23 papers. Among 20 papers, side-effect was found in 93 eyes (31.41%) and the serious sideeffect in 4 eyes (1.35%).ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA has some curative effects for macular edema in short term, but the quality of current study has not been encouraging. There are no grade I document and lack of the study of validity in long term and essentiality and validity of retreatment. The special attention should be payed on the increasing persistency of efficacy and preventing the serious side-effects in the future investigation.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:220-223)
ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on diffused diabetic macular edema.MethodsIntravitreous injection with TA was performed on 21 patients with diabetic macular edema who had undergone ocular-fundus examination, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The followup duration was 1 month, 3, and 6 months. The visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and retinal thickness at the macular area before and after the treatment, examined by ETDRS eye chart, noncontact tonometer, and OCT respectively, were observed and compared.ResultsOne month, 3, and 6 months after the injection, the mean extent of improvement of visual acuity was 7.5, 9.1 (including 2-line improvement in 10 eyes which occupied 48%), and 5.1 letters respectively; while the decrease of retinal thickness at macula was 143 μm (decrease of 33%), 184 μm (decrease of 42%), and 151 μm (decrease of 35%) respectively.ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA is effective for diffused diabetic macular edema in a short term (about 3 months).(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:217-219)
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for cystoid macular edema (CME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsFourteen eyes of 14 patients with CME due to CRVO underwent intravitreous injection with 0.1 ml TA (40 mg/ml). Best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), slitlamp examinaion, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed on the patients before and after the injection. The follow-up period was 10-22.4 months, with the mean of 15.9 months.ResultsThe average visual acuity was 0.1 before the treatment; while 1 month and 3 months after the injection, the visual acuity of all of the patients improved, including ≥0.2 in 71.43% and 63.6% of the patients, respectively, and ≥0.5 in 429% and 27.3%, respectively. After then, the visual acuity of some patients decreased, and in the final visit, 4 eyes (28.6%) had a visual acuity of ≥0.2, and 1 eye (7.1%) of ≥0.5. Compared with that before the treatment, the visual acuity of 10 (71.4%) eyes improved and 4 (28.6%) eyes declined. One month after the treatment, the macular edema disappeared in 10 eyes (71.4%) and alleviated in 4 (28.6%). In the final visit, macular edema disappeared in 4 eyes, alleviated in 9, and aggravated in 1. In the follow-up duration, high IOP［22.3-40.1 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)］. In the final visit, posterior subcapsular cataract was found in 7 eyes.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA may be effective in reducing CME and enhancing the visual acuity in a short term with high IOP in some eyes. In the long-term follow-up period, the rate of recurrence of CME and incidence of posterior subcapsular cataract is high. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:213-216)
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of acetazolamide treatment on chronic cystoid macular edema (CME). METHODS:Thirty-seven patients (40 eyes)with documented chronic CME of various causes were prospectively treated for 4-week periods with acetazolamide or a placebo in a randomised,crossover study that compared their effects on the reduction of macular edema and improvement of visual functions. Central retinal artery(CRA) blood flow was determined using Doppler velocimetry and vessel diameter measurement using computerised digital image analysis of monochromatic fundus photographs on 10 patients (12 eyes)with CME pre-and post-administration of acetazolamide. RESULTS:More than half the patients showed a response to acetazolamide with partial or complete resolution of. edema. Thirty eyes had improved in visual acuity in the treated patients. Statistically significant improvement were seen in 10deg; thresholds of visual field and ERG b wave amplitude. No improvement was seen when the patients received placebo. There were significant increase of blood flow velocity in CRA and retinal vessels diameter after acetazolamide were administered 3 hours later in CME patients (Plt;0.05). CONCLUSION: Acetazolamide could be of value in reducing the degree of edema and improving visual function to chronic CME. The improvement on retinal circulation might be a major cause to limit the CME. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,1997,13: 89-92）