【摘要】 目的 了解四川省基层医疗卫生机构基本医疗功能开展情况，以便有针对性地采取措施，提高基层医疗卫生机构的服务能力。 方法 2008年8月采用自填式问卷调查的方法，对基层医疗卫生机构开展的基本医疗功能情况进行调查。 结果 基层医疗卫生机构提供的三类基本医疗功能（基本检查项目、常见病诊疗、家庭诊疗及转诊）总体情况不甚理想，基本检查项目开展情况社区卫生服务中心好于乡镇/街道卫生院。一级项目中除社区卫生服务中心转出服务开展比例达100%外，大部分医疗卫生机构一级、二级项目开展不全，社区卫生服务中心与乡镇/街道卫生院X线检查开展比例均在50%左右，常见病诊疗部分一级项目开展机构的比例不到30%。家庭诊疗及转诊二级项目两类机构开展比例均较低。 结论 基层医疗卫生机构提供的基本医疗功能特别是常见病诊疗项目有待加强。【Abstract】 Objective To understand the situation of basic medical services in primary medical institutions of Sichuan province so as to take related measures to improve the medical services in primary medical institutions. Methods We used self-administered questionnaires to investigate the basic medical services in primary medical institutions in August, 2008. Results The general situation of the three types of basic medical services (basic examination items, common disease diagnosis and treatment, family diagnosis and treatment and referrals) was not very good, but the development of basic examination items in the community health service center was better than that in villages and town hospitals or street service center. Among all kinds of first-grade medical health services, except for that the referral service in community health service center accounted for 100%, most of the first and second-grade medical health services were not fully developed. The proportion of X ray detection in community health service center and villages and town hospitals or street service center was about 50%, and the development of common disease diagnosis and treatment among the first grade medical health services accounted for only 30%. The proportion of family diagnosis and treatment and referrals was low. Conclusion The basic medial services in primary medical institutions should be strengthened, especially for the common disease diagnosis and treatment.
Objective To investigate the situation of human resources of primary health care institutions in Chengdu and provide references for rational allocation of health personnel in primary health care. Methods From October to November 2016, self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate the situation of the human resources of health workers in a total of 390 primary health care institutions in the three circles of Chengdu (including the subsidiary counties, towns, and districts) during 2015. The Health Resources Density Index (HRDI) was calculated and its equilibrium was analyzed. Frequency and constituent ratio were used for descriptive analysis. Results Three hundred and seventy valid questionnaires were recovered. The number of clinical doctors, general practitioners, and registered nurses per 10 000 residents in Chengdu was 5.32, 1.38, and 4.32, respectively. Doctors’ and nurses’ HRDI was 0.52 and 0.42 respectively. The number of intermediate and junior professional titles accounted for 15.91% and 52.13% respectively. The ratio of doctors to nurses was 1∶0.81, and the ratio of general practitioners to nurses was 0.32∶1. Structure rationality of distribution density and professional titles of healthcare personnel showed a decreasing trend from the first circle to the third circle. Conclusions The personnel troop of primary health care service in Chengdu has been formed. However, the professional title structure and the distribution of professional categories still need to be improved. The situation of primary health workers in the third circle is relatively backward compared with other circles in Chengdu. It is suggested that the number of nurses and general practitioners should increase properly, and rational intervation should be carryed out in the distribution of primary health workers, so as to balance and develop the grass-root health personnel in the three circles of Chengdu.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the willingness rate of the first consultation in primary health care institutions among Chinese residents.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science and EMbase databases were electronically searched to collect cross-sectional studies on the willingness rate of the first consultation in primary health care institutions of residents in China from January 2006 to November 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 14.1 software.ResultsA total of 26 cross-sectional studies involving 36 430 subjects were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the willingness rate of Chinese residents for the first consultation in primary health care institutions was 61.4% (95%CI 54.5% to 68.3%). The results of subgroup analysis showed that for the willingness rates of the first treatment at the grassroots level in male and female residents were 65.6% and 64.9%; urban and rural residents were 49.9% and 58.9%; <60 and ≥60 years old residents were 60.5% and 71.6%; primary school and below, junior high school, high school or technical secondary school, junior college or above educational level residents were 72.8%, 68.1%, 64.2%, and 52.8%; employees, residents, and other types of insurance residents were 74.1%, 75.9%, and 64.4%; residents with monthly income <3 000, 3 000-5 000, and >5 000 yuan were 65.8%, 65.3%, and 58.5%; high, medium, and poor levels of health status residents were 56.8%, 52.6%, and 48.8%; with and without chronic diseases residents were 61.0% and 56.9%; with and without spouse residents were 63.9% and 64.6%; with and without contracted family doctor residents were 87.1% and 62.6%; on duty, retired, and other employment status residents were 70.7%, 69.9% and 71.5%; primary medical institutions residents those were satisfied, average, and dissatisfied were 77.3%, 60.7%, and 49.4%.ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that it remains room for improvement in the level of willingness of Chinese residents for first consultation in primary health care institutions. Residence, age, educational level, type of medical insurance, income level, health level, family doctors contracted status, and satisfaction with primary medical institutions have an impact on residents' willingness to receive first treatment at primary hospitals. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.