Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Dan Hong injection for patients with angina pectoris compared with compound salvia injection as the control group. Methods Databases were electronically searched from MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data (January, 2007 to July, 2010), and reference lists of all papers identified were also checked. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effect of Dan Hong injection on angina pectoris were identified and assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and then RevMan 4.3 was used to undertake Meta analysis. Results Twenty-seven trials involving 3 030 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that: a) Compared with compound salvia injection, Dan Hong injection was capable of significantly decreasing the angina incidence (OR=3.84, 95% CI 3.03 to 4.88, Plt;0.000 01); b) Dan Hong injection was capable of significantly improving ECG review effectiveness compared with compound salvia injection (OR=1.98, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.66, Plt;0.000 01); c) Dan Hong injection was obviously superior to compound salvia injection in improving the NST (WMD= 0.78, 95%CI 0.42 to 1.14, Plt;0.000 1) and ∑ST (WMD= 0.45, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.57, Plt;0.000 01); and d) Dan Hong injection was able to obviously improve the hemorheology index after angina pectoris; Meta-analyses of eight trials in which adverse events were reported showed that no significant difference was found between Dan Hong injection and salvia injection (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.33 to 1.25, P=0.19). Conclusion Dan Hong injection can effectively improve the ST segment ischemia and hemorheology index after angina pectoris, significantly increase the effectiveness of electrocardiogram reviews and eventually significantly reduce the recurrence rate of angina, and appears to be much safer. Further high quality RCTs are required to provide reliable evidence on the treatment of patients with angina pectoris.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection (include Danshen Injection and Fufang Danshen Injection) for chronic cor pulmonale. Design A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Method Randomized trials comparing Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection plus routine treatment versus muting treatment alone were identified by electronic and manual searches. No blinding and language limitations were applied. The Jadad scale assessed the methodological quality of trials. Results Thirty randomized trials (n=2 161) were identified. The methodological quality of all trials included was low. The combined results (RR and 95%CI) of symptom scores was 1.20 (1.15 to 1.26). Because of the significant heterogeneity, many other markers of the blood rheology can not be combined. The reason for heterogeneity should include the differences among cases and studies. Because of lacking enough studies, the conclusions about mortality and oxidants/antioxidants markers were not b. Only a few studies had reported adverse events. Conclusions Based in the review, Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection may have positive effect on symptom scores in patients with chronic cor pulmonale. But for mortality, the markers of blood rheology and oxidants/antioxidants, there is no reliable conclusion. However, the evidence is not b due to the general low methodological quality, the variations among studies and experimental markers themselves, and lacking of more relevant and important markers. Further large trials are needed.
Objective Danshen dripping pill (DSP) and tongxinluo capsule (TXL) are popular Chinese medicinal products and often compared with isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in treating angina pectoris. Hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about DSP and TXL have been published; however, there has been no systematic review on comparing DSP with TXL. This study aims to provide a comprehensive PRISMA-compliant systematic review with sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis to valuate indirectly the efficacies of DSP and TXL in treating angina pectoris. Methods RCTs published between 1994 and 2009 on DSP and TXL in treating angina pectoris for four or more weeks were retrieved from databases. The qualities of RCTs included were evaluated with Jadad scale. Meta-analysis was performed on overall effects of symptomatic and electrocardiographic (ECG) improvements. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to measure the effect size. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were conducted on basic characteristics of RCTs. Results 65 RCTs with 6 969 participants were included. Average Jadad score was 2.11. Overall ORs were 3.66 (95%CI 2.67 to 5.02) for TXL versus ISDN and 2.38 (95%CI 1.90 to 2.99) for DSP versus ISDN. There was a significant difference (W=521.5, P=0.049 45) in ORs between DSP and TXL. Statistical analyses found no significant factors affecting overall efficacies of TXL and DSP. The rates of adverse events under DSP and TXL treatments were 2.37% and 2.11%, respectively. Conclusion DSP and TXL are more effective than ISDN in treating angina pectoris. TXL might be more effective than DSP. However, further RCTs of larger scale, multi-centre/country, longer follow-up periods and higher quality are still required to verify.
Objective To investigate the current situation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on compound salvia pellet (CSP) for angina pectoris and assess whether there is adequate evidence for clinical practice. Methods We collected all the published clinical studies on CSP for angina pectoris from 1994 to December 2005, and assessed each included report using the Jadad scale, the revised CONSORT statement and other self-edited items. Results We finally identified 115 RCTs. Among which, 1 scored 3 points, 6 scored 2 points, 106 scored 1 points and 2 socred 0 points. No RCT performed allocation concealment according to the CONSORT criteria, only 4 RCTs (3.5%) described the generation of the randomization sequence, among which 2 were quasi-randomized. No RCT provided randomization implementation,1 RCT (0.9%) carried out placebo control, 1 RCT (0.9%) reported endpoint, 9 RCTs (7.8%) adopted single blinding, 4 RCTs (3.5%) reported double blinding, 11 RCTs (9.6%) calculated statistical values, 2 RCTs (1.7%) provided the record of follow-up, 1 RCT (0.9%) reported negative outcome, 25 RCTs (21.8%) described adverse events, no RCT described how the sample size was estimated, and how an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and correlation analysis were reported, 1 RCT (0.9%) was multi-center, no RCT completed ethical approval and informed consent, 27 RCTs (23.5%) described syndrome type of TCM. Conclusion Currently, the methodology and reporting of studies on CSP for angina pectoris are not good enough to provide reliable evidence for clinical practice.
摘要:目的:探讨复方丹参加西咪替丁治疗过敏性紫癜(HSP)临床疗效。方法:60例患儿随机分为对照组和治疗组各30例。对照组常规治疗,治疗组加用复方丹参和西咪替丁治疗。结果:治疗组总有效率为90.0%,明显高于对照组53.3%,且治疗组紫癜性肾炎(HSPN)发生率(10.0%)明显低于对照组(36.7%),Plt;0.01。结论:复方丹参加西咪替丁能提高HSP患儿疗效,减少肾损害,促进患儿病情康复。
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of Salvia Miltiorrhiza (SM) and Shengmai injection （SI） in treating systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and their mechanism. Methods The animal model of SIRS was established by injectinglipopolysaccharide(LPS, 1 mg/kg)intraperitoneally. Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: control group, SM group, SI group and combined treatment group (SM+SI group), which were treated with normal saline（5 ml/kg） plus LPS（1 mg/kg）, SM（5 ml/kg）plus LPSKG4（1 mg/kg）, SI（5 ml/kg）plus LPS（1 mg/kg）, SM（2.5 ml/kg） plus SI（2.5 ml/kg） and LPS（1 mg/kg） respectively. Six rats of each group were sacrificed for sample collection of blood, liver, lung and kidney 8 hours after LPS injection. Blood routine, serum TNF-α and IL-6 were measured. Specimen of organs were fixed in formalin and sent for routine pathological examination. The survival of other 4 rats of each group were observed untill 48 hours after LPS injection. SPSS 10.0 was used in statistical analysis. Results Two rats in control group died 13 hours and 22 hours after LPS injection respectively, the remaining 2 rats in this group and the rats in other 3 groups survived 48 hours after LPS injection. The white blood cell count of control group was significantly higher than that of other groups. The serum TNF-α and IL-6 of control group were significantly more than those of other groups. Pathological damages were found in all groups, and the most severe ones were in control group. SM and SI could decrease the level of serum TNF-α and IL-6 in the process of LPS-stimulated SIRS, down-regulate the severe inflammatory response, attenuate organ damages of the liver, lung and kidney, and increase forty-eihgt-hour survival rate obviously. Conclusion The experiment provides a theoretical base for clinical use of SM and SI in treatment of SIRS.