Search

外伤性肝脾破裂48例报告

SIMULTANEOUS LIGATION OF SPLENIC ARTERY AND VEIN FOR SEVERE TRAUMATIC RUPTURE OF SPLEEN

In order to preserve more normal tissue in situ in case of severe traumatic rupture of spleen, simultaneous ligation of splenic artery and vein was performed successfully on animals and then was applied for clinic use. The preserved splenic tissue all survivied and functioned well. Patients with severe traumatic rupture of spleen grade Ⅳ-Ⅴ were all cured by ligation of both the splenic artery and vein at the same time.

外伤性脾破裂104例诊治体会

外伤性脾破裂诊断与治疗

【摘要】 目的 总结外伤性脾破裂的治疗经验。方法 回顾性分析2001年—2008年收治的41例外伤性脾破裂的诊治经过。结果 手术治疗30例,痊愈29例,死亡1例,手术死亡率3.3％。非手术治疗11例,治愈9例，死亡2例。结论 脾外伤手术方式的选择应视患者伤情、脾脏损伤程度及术者自身条件而定。

Application Experience of Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients with Traumatic Splenic Rupture

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of the treatment of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with traumatic splenic rupture. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2009, 48 cases of traumatic splenic rupture underwent laparoscopic splenectomy were analyzed in this hospital. According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, different operative methods were taken， including titanic clipping in 12 cases， titanic clipping combining silk suture ligation in 8 cases， snare combining titanic clipping in 10 cases， LigaSure in 8 cases， and EndoGIA in 8 cases. ResultsLaparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in 32 cases; Handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy was applied in 14 cases, and 2 cases were converted to laparotomy because of tight spleen adhesion with surrounding tissues and bleeding rupture of the short gastric vessels. The operation time was 120－170 min with an average 140 min; the estimated intraoperative amount of blood loss was 300－1 200 ml with an average 800 ml. No postoperative complication occurred such as gastric fistula, pancreatic fistula or hemorrhage. Conclusion According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, individual operative method can improve mission success rate in the laparoscopic splenectomy in traumatic splenic rupture.

Clinical Application of Laparoscopic Techniques in Treatment of Traumatic Spleen Rupture

目的探讨腹腔镜技术在治疗外伤性脾破裂中的可行性和安全性。 方法回顾性分析笔者所在医院2012年3月至2014年3月期间应用腹腔镜技术救治的19例外伤性脾破裂患者的临床资料。 结果本组19例患者中，顺利完成腹腔镜手术17例，中转开腹2例，均获得成功救治，痊愈出院。其中行腹腔镜下电凝止血＋生物蛋白胶黏合保脾4例，行腹腔镜下无损伤线缝合＋网膜覆盖保脾8例，行腹腔镜脾切除术5例，中转开腹行脾切除术2例。手术时间50～186 min，平均90 min；术中失血250～2 200 mL，平均780 mL；术后住院时间7～26 d，平均13.5 d，术后均无并发症发生。术后19例患者均获访，随访时间为3～12个月，平均8个月。随访期间无死亡及远期并发症发生。 结论对外伤性脾破裂患者选择性施行的腹腔镜脾修补术和脾切除术具有良好的效果，其具有创伤小、痛苦轻及恢复快的优点，安全而可行，值得推广。

临时控制性脾动脉结扎联合脾修补术治疗外伤性脾破裂36例报道

目的探讨临时控制性脾动脉结扎联合脾修补术治疗外伤性脾破裂的手术效果及对脾脏正常血供的影响。 方法将我院2004年12月至2014年12月期间所做的临时控制性脾动脉结扎加脾修补（研究组，n=36）与单纯性脾修补患者（对照组，n=36）的临床资料进行回顾性对比分析。 结果2组均治愈出院。研究组的平均引流管拔除时间明显早于对照组（P=0.000），研究组的平均总引流量也明显少于对照组（P=0.000）；2组手术时间、住院时间及术后总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。所有并发症均经抗炎、胸腔穿刺抽液、切口引流加压包扎及对症治疗后获愈。 结论临时控制性脾动脉结扎加脾修补治疗的临床疗效优于单纯性脾修补手术，并且避免了永久性脾动脉结扎对脾脏远期主干血供的影响。

The application effect of laparoscopic versus open surgery in treatment of traumatic rupture of spleen: a meta-analysis

Objective To investigate the difference of effect between laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with traumatic rupture of spleen. Methods The literatures on comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with traumatic rupture of spleen were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from Jan. 2007 to Jan. 2017, and then Stata 12.0 software was applied to present meta-analysis. Results ① The condition during operation: compared with the OS group, operative time of the LS group was shorter [SMD=–0.71, 95% CI was (–1.12, –0.30), P=0.001] and intraoperative blood loss of the LS group was less [SMD=–1.53, 95% CI was (–2.28, –0.78), P<0.001]. ② The postoperative condition: compared with the OS group, the postoperative anal exhaust time [SMD=–2.47, 95% CI was (–3.24, –1.70), P<0.001], postoperative ambulation time [SMD=–2.97, 95% CI was (–4.32, –1.62), P<0.001], and hospital stay [SMD=–1.68, 95% CI was (–2.15, –1.21), P<0.001] of the LS group were all shorter. ③ The overall incidence of complications and the incidence of complications: on the one hand, compared with the OS group, patients in the LS group had a lower overall incidence of postoperative complications [OR=0.29, 95% CI was (0.19, 0.43), P<0.001]. On the other hand, compared with the OS group, patients in the LS group had lower incidences of infection [OR=0.27, 95% CI was (0.13, 0.55), P<0.001], ascites [OR=0.36, 95% CI was (0.13, 1.00), P=0.049], bleeding [OR=0.29, 95% CI was (0.10, 0.90), P=0.032], ileus [OR=0.34, 95% CI was (0.13, 0.90), P=0.030], incision fat liquefaction [OR=0.27, 95% CI was (0.08, 0.94), P=0.040], and incision rupture [OR=0.17, 95% CI was (0.03, 0.96), P=0.045]. However, there was no statistical difference on splenectomy fever [OR=0.41, 95% CI was (0.13, 1.27), P=0.123], pancreatic fistula [OR=0.40, 95% CI was (0.06, 2.63), P=0.343], liver function lesion [OR=0.36, 95% CI was (0.10, 1.34), P=0.127], and thrombosis [OR=0.33, 95% CI was (0.09, 1.22), P=0.097] between the 2 groups. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery can not only significantly reduce the incidence of multiple complications of traumatic rupture of spleen, but also can speed up the recovery rate of postoperative recovery. Therefore, it is safe and beneficial in treatment of patients with traumatic rupture of spleen.