Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of external fixation versus intramedulllary nailing in the treatment of adult tibial shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscule Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006), EMBASE (1980 to March 2006) and PUBMED (1966 to March 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing external fixation versus intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults were included. The quality of these trials was critically assessed. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 for data analyses. Result Three RCTs and two quasi-RCTs involving a total of 279 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that external fixation for tibial shaft fractures in adults may increase the infection rate [RR 2.45, 95%CI (1.31,4.61), P=0.005], and the malunion rate [RR 2.85, 95%CI (1.20,6.79), P=0.02] but may reduce the duration of hospitalization [RR –5.50, 95%CI (–6.99,–4.01)]. The nonunion rate, delayed healing rate, and healing time, were comparable between external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Conclusion The trials available for this systematic review are too few and small for reliable estimates of the relative effects of external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Further studies are needed to determine these effects , especially for patients who have GustiloШ C fractures.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of mini external fixation device for comminuted open fractures of the metacarpal and phalange. Methods Between October 2009 and April 2011, 33 patients with comminuted open fractures of the metacarpal and phalange were treated with mini external fixation device. There were 25 males and 8 females, aged from 21 to 62 years with an average of 25.5 years. Of 33 cases, 7 were rated as Gustilo type II and 26 as Gustilo type IIIA; 20 cases were diagnosed as having simple metacarpal and phalangeal comminuted fractures and 13 cases as having combined interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint fractures. Partial or complete rupture of tendon was observed in 18 cases. The time between injury and operation was 2-8 hours (mean, 3.7 hours). After one stage debridement and reduction, fracture was fixed with mini external fixation device. Results Primary healing of incision was obtained in 30 cases and no pin hole infection was found. Incision infection occurred in 3 cases and leaded to nonunion. Nonunion also occured in 2 cases of simple metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. The mean follow-up was 8 months (range, 6 months to 1 year). X-ray films showed fracture healing in 13 cases after 8 weeks (8 cases of simple metacarpal and phalangeal fractures and 5 cases of combined interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint fractures), in 12 cases after 12 weeks (7 cases of simple metacarpal and phalangeal fractures and 5 cases of interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint fractures), and in 3 cases of simple metacarpal and phalangeal fractures after 6 months. After removing the mini external fixation device and functional exercise, 3 cases of simple metacarpal and phalangeal comminuted fractures and 4 cases of combined interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint fractures still had joint stiffness, but had no finger rotation and alignment deformity or chronic pain. According to the measurement of total active movement for 28 patients who obtained fracture healing, the results were excellent in 7 cases, good in 12 cases, fair in 5 cases, and poor in 4 cases, the excellent and good rate was 67.9%. Conclusion The mini external fixation device is a good technique for comminuted open fractures of metacarpal and phalange. In patients having comminuted open fractures with interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint fracture, the results are fair or poor.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of hinged external fixator with mini-plate to treat terrible triad of the elbow. Methods Between August 2008 and June 2011, 11 patients with terrible triad of the elbow were treated with hinged external fixator combined with mini-plate. There were 9 males and 2 females, aged 22-56 years (mean, 34 years). The injuries were caused by falling from height in 8 cases and traffic accident in 3 cases. All patients were closed injury. The time from injury to operation varied from 8 hours to 7 days (mean, 3.7 days). According to Mason classification standard, all radial head fractures were type IV and complicated by posterior dislocation of the elbow; according to Regan-Morrey classification standard, ulna coronary process fractures were type I in 3 cases, type II in 3 cases, and type III in 5 cases. Results All the patients achieved primary healing of incision after operation and no nerve injury occurred. The patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 15 months). Two cases had screw channel infection after 12 weeks of operation, and 1 case had mild heterotopic ossification of the elbow after 4 months of operation. X-ray films showed that all fractures healed from 8 to 20 weeks (mean, 16 weeks). No recurrent dislocation or instability of the elbow occurred. At 12 months after operation, the elbow range of motion (ROM) were 120-145° (mean, 135°) in flexion, 0-25° (mean, 10°) in extension, 50-90° (mean, 70°) in pronation, and 50-80° (mean, 60°) in supination. According to Mayo elbow function evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.8%. Conclusion Hinged external fixator with mini-plate can enhance postoperative stability of the elbow. This therapy is beneficial to early functional exercise and obviously decrease the disability rate caused by complex damage on the elbow.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of the preservation of the epiphysis and joint function of the distal femur in children with osteosarcoma with epiphyseal distraction by external fixator. Methods Between July 2007 and May 2011, 6 children with osteoblastic osteosarcoma of the distal femur underwent epiphyseal distraction by external fixator, combined with tumor resection and repair with massive allograft bone transplantation to preserve the epiphysis and joint function of the distal femur. There were 4 boys and 2 girls, aged from 9 to 14 years (mean, 10.5 years). According to Enneking clinical staging, 4 cases were in stage II A and 2 cases in stage II B. According to San-Julian et al. typing for metaphyseal tumor invasion, 3 cases were in type I and 3 cases in type II. The size of tumor ranged from 6 cm × 4 cm to 12 cm × 9 cm. All patients received 2 cycles of COSS 86 chemotherapy before operation and 4 cycles after operation. Results Poor healing of incision was observed in 1 case because of rejection of allograft bone and good healing was obtained after the symptomatic treatment, healing of incision by first intention was achieved in the other children. All 6 cases were followed up 11 to 56 months (mean, 37.5 months). One case died of lung metastasis at 2 years after operation. X-ray films showed no complication of internal fixator loosening and broken or bone nonunion. According to the functional evaluation criteria of International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case; the excellent and good rate was 83.3%. The length of operated limb was (62.97 ± 7.51) cm, showing significant difference when compared with that of normal limb [(64.03 ± 7.47) cm] (t=0.246 6, P=0.813 4). Conclusion On the premise of adaptable indication, effective chemotherapy, and thoroughly tumor resection, the epiphyseal distraction by external fixator can obtain satisfactory results in limb-length and limb function in children with osteoblastic osteosarcoma of the distal femur.
【Abstract】 Objective To assess the results of treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with leverage reductionand bone graft assisted by external fixators. Methods From September 2005 to May 2007, 27 cases of unstable distal radius fractures were treated by leverage reduction and bone graft, meanwhile assisted by external fixators. The cases included 16 males and 11 females, aged from 18 to 69 years with an average of 49. 3 years. Fractures were caused by fall ing in 19 cases, crash from high place in 1 case, traffic accident in 6 cases, and obtuse strike directly in 1 case, which were all closed fresh bone fractures. According to the standard of AO, all cases were classified as type C1 in 13 cases, type C2 in 11 cases, and type C3 in 3 cases. The palmar incl inination was from － 38° to 10°(mean － 12.2°); the ulnar deviation angle was from 6° to 30° (mean 19. 1°) before operations. The operations were performed from 1 to 3 days after injuries. The function of the carpal joints and the boneheal ing conditions were evaluated after operations. Results All cases were followed up for 4-24 months(mean 13. 1 months). No compl ications such as pin loosening, dislocation of fixators, injury of blood vessels and radial nerves, pin track infections occurred. According to Mcbride scoring, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 13 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 1 case, the excellent and good rate being 85. 2%. One case had traumatic arthritis and 1 case had wrist joint stiffness. All achieved fractures uniton 8-10 weeks (mean 9.3 weeks) after operations. The palmar incl inination angle was from 0° to 20° (mean 13. 4°); the ulnar deviation angle was from 10° to 33° (mean 22. 1°) after operations. Conclusion Treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius by use of leverage reduction and bone graft with external fixator offers many advantages, such as simple operation, satisfactory reduction, rigid fixation, excellent function and lower incidence rate of traumatic arthritis.
【Abstract】 Objective To summary the effects of staged pelvic closure using external fixator combined withreconstruction plate for old Tile B1 pelvic fracture. Methods From August 2000 to August 2006, 14 patients (9 males and 5 females, age ranging from 21 to 65 years with old Tile B1 pelvic fracture with pubic symphysis separation were treated. The injuries were caused by the traffic accident in 10 patients, high crash in 3, and crush in 1. The duration ranged from 4 weeks to 3 months. The 14 patients were compl icated with other injuries in some degrees. The X-ray and CT showed pubic symphysis separation. In 13 patients, pubic symphysis separation distance was more than 2.5 cm, who also had fracture or dislocation in the posterior structure of pelvis. The X-ray films showed the mean pubic symphysis separation distance was (6.67 ± 2.11) cm preoperatively. The 14 patients underwent pelvic external fixation at first and staged pelvic closure gradually for the pubic symphysis separation. After 2 to 3 weeks, when the pubic symphysis separation distance was less than 1 cm, the patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with reconstruction plate. Pubic symphysis separation distance was measuredin the preoperative and postoperative pelvic anterioposterior X-ray films. The condition of the posterior structure of pelvis was observed in CT films. The functions of patients were assessed according to Majeed grading system. Results All incisions healed by first intention. The 14 patients were followed up for 6 months to 2 years (15 months on average). The X-ray films showed the mean pubic symphysis separation distance of post-operation was (0.85 ± 0.23) cm, showing statistically significant difference when compared with that of pre-operation (P lt; 0.05). The CT films showed fracture and dislocation of the posterior structure of pelvis had bony heal ing after 6 to 12 months. According to the Majeed grading system, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 4 cases and poor in 1 case; the excellent and good rate was 64.29%. Conclusion Staged pelvic closure using external fixation combined with reconstruction plate for old pelvic fracture with pubic symphysis separation can reduce the pubic symphysis separation distance significantly. Satisfactory effects can be expected in treating the patients with TileB1 fracture.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of external fixation (EF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for unstable distal radius fractures in adults. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), Cochrane Central register of controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008), EMbase (1974 to September 2008), CBM, CNKI, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EF and ORIF for unstable distal radius fractures in adults. The quality of the included studies was critically assessed and data analyses were performed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Seven RCTs involving 634 patients were included, of which 269 were in EF group, and 293 were in ORIF group. Only 1 study had relative high quality, all the others had some limitation in randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment. The results of meta-analyses showed that, 1) about the effectiveness: according to the Gartland and Werley grade standard, the ORIF group was better than the EF group with statistic difference (RR=1.50, 95%CI 1.11 to 2.03, P=0.008); because of the original studies did not offer the detailed data including pad strength, grip strength, flexion-extension, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation, we only processed a descriptive analysis; and 2) about complications: the infection rate of the pin track was higher in the EF group than that in the ORIF group with statistic difference (RR=0.24, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.76, P=0.02); but there were no differences between the two groups in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.30 to 2.56, P=0.82), extensor tendon rupture (RR=3.93, 95%CI 0.45 to 34.62, P=0.22), and compartment syndrome (RR=3.13, 95%CI 0.51 to 19.09, P=0.22). Conclusions Compared with EF, ORIF is much better based on Gartland and Werley grade standard, and causes much less infection. Because of the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more proofs are required from more RCTs with large sample.