目的：探讨蛋白酶体抑制剂——硼替佐米对初治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及对移植造血干细胞采集的影响。方法：对一例初发的中年男性多发性骨髓瘤患者使用硼替佐米+地塞米松+反应停（VTD）的方案进行化疗，获得缓解后采集外周血造血干细胞。结果：应用以硼替佐米为基础的方案治疗3个疗程后，患者即获得完全缓解；完成4个疗程化疗后成功采集足够数量的外周血造血干细胞；完成6个疗程化疗后，进入维持治疗，至今已完全缓解17个月。治疗过程中除恶心、呕吐外无其他明显不良反应。结论：硼替佐米用于初治多发性骨髓瘤有良好的治疗效果，不良反应少，不影响造血干细胞采集。
Objcetive To assess the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (LD) compared with placebo plus dexamethasone (PD) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods Data were searched in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2010), MEDLINE (with PubMed, 1966 to Nov. 2010), EMbase (1984 to Nov. 2010), CBMdisc (1978 to Nov. 2010), and CNKI (1979 to Nov. 2010), and also searched in clinical trials register for ongoing studies and completed studies with unpublished data. The references of the included studies and relevant supplement or conference abstracts were handsearched. Randomized controlled trials were included. The data were extracted, and then the quality of the included studies was assessed by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses for studies with low heterogeneity. Results Two studies involving 704 participants were included. One was high quality study, while the other was unclear about randomization and allocation concealment. The adverse outcomes of LD, such as mortality (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.97, P=0.03) and incidence of disease progression (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.34, Plt;0.000 01), were better than those of PD, which had significant differences. The overall response rate was higher in the LD group than in the PD group (RR=2.75, 95%CI 2.22 to 3.41, Plt;0.000 01). The incidence of thrombotic event (RR=3.20, 95%CI 1.78 to 5.73, Plt;0.000 1), the Grade Three and Grade Four neutropenia (RR=10.20, 95%CI 5.76 to 18.08, Plt;0.000 01), the Grade Three and Grade Four thrombocytopenia (RR=2.08, 95%CI 1.28 to 3.38, P=0.003), and the incidence of drug withdrawal or dosage reduction due to adverse reactions (RR=1.34, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.49, Plt;0.000 01) were all higher in the LD group than in the PD group. Conclusion The efficacy of LD is superior to that of PD for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, but the incidence of drug adverse events, such as thrombosis, Grade Three or Grader Four neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, is also higher than that of PD, which has to be prevented positively.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of bisphosphonates in treating patients with Multiple Myeloma. Methods The databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, and CNKI were searched. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently, and disagreement, if any, was resolved by discussion. Meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies. Results Eleven RCTs were included, all of which came from abroad. The methodological quality of the included studies was good. The baseline data of each trial were comparable. Meta-analyses showed that, the pooled analysis of the published evidence demonstrated the beneficial effect of bisphosphonates on prevention of pathological vertebral fractures (OR=0.59, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.78, P=0.000 1) and on relieving pain (OR=0.59, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.76, P=0.000 05). However, the analysis of the effect of bisphosphonates on pain was based on clinically heterogeneous data which must be interpreted with caution. Meanwhile, there was no significant effect of bisphosphonates on mortality (OR=0.99, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.12, P=0.9) and hypercalcemia (OR=0.76, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.03, P=0.07). Conclusions Adding bisphosphonates to the treatment of myeloma can reduce pathological vertebral fractures and pain, but is not helpful to mortality and hypercalcemia.